The first edition of this book (1981) was entitled “Contribution à un Lexique commenté
en Science de l'Action Motrice,” (Contribution to a commented lexicon in Science of
Motor Action). Eighteen years later, a new and augmented edition (1999) is intitled
“Jeux, Sports et Société,” (Games, Sports, and Society), with a subtitle “Lexique
de Praxéologie Motrice,” (Lexicon of Motor Praxeology). The cover of the first edition
was stark. The second one draws the attention with a sixteen century print showing
players in action. The first edition is a testimony of the birth of a new point of
view on motor actions. The second highlights one of the consequence of this new point
of view: the interest of traditional games. Motor praxeology was bearing itself the
highlighting of their richness.
Through the definition of the concepts necessary for an in-depth reading of motor
situations, Parlebas proposes a scientific language specific to the field of physical
activities and sports (PAS) and an innovative analysis of physical and playful activities.
He founds “the motor action science,” which defines motor situation as a communication
range. This means the abandonment of classic descriptive perspectives for the benefit
of a conception mostly dynamic and relational, through a problematic linked to action.
Of this “motor praxeology,” the author keeps the personalist aspect (Ullman, 1985):
human behavior always has a meaning and motor skills cannot be confused with movement
on its mechanical way. It is the “motor conduct” of a subject (Parlebas, 1981, 1999).
There is no praxic activity without reading, without interpretation of the multiple
informational elements of the situation, without relationship to the world and others.
The subject is an acting subject, a subject in situation, a subject deciding the strategy
and the action to be constructed.
We understand thenceforth the choice made in favor of traditional sporting games (TSG),
widely represented in the book. For a long time condemned by the authorities, abandoned
for the most disadvantaged, and neglected by research, TSG reveal their complexity.
“Few authors have studied games on the field, in their operation, and in their original
characteristics. The risk is strong to only present a game alchemy, with missing a
rigorous study of true playful chemistry” (Parlebas, 2003, p. 2).
The modeling of structures of motor situations done by Parlebas in his lexicon reveals
the extraordinary richness of TSG. Above all, he emphasizes the necessity to take
into account the internal logic (Parlebas, 1981, 1999), an intrinsic reality of sporting
games which expose the motor conducts. These conducts manifest according to the relationship
they create between the actor and its environment: relationship with space, objects,
time, and other actors. The analysis of this interaction, primordial step and essential
for an objective understanding of the game, leads to a reconsideration of TSG: the
inclusion of “affectivity, the key to motor conducts” (Parlebas, 1970, 2017), symbolic
aspects, representations, communication, motor decisions, informational data, signs
and codes, particularly abundant in TSG, induce on the field important changes in
pedagogical interventions modalities, and a new way of conceiving research in PAS
field.
The classificatory and modeling approach offered by the author, notably borrowed to
theory of games and theory of graphs, comes to complete the identification of game:
According to Parlebas, the system of interactions defined by the rules of ludomotor
contract creates an organization of motor actions, whose configurations reveal basic
structures of the game process. “It's the body of rules that brings into play the
rules of body” (Parlebas, 2003, p. 3) as he said. These configurations are operational
models, called “universals” of sporting games; therefore, with analysis of the network
of TSG motor communications, of the structure of their score interactions, of the
network of sociomotor roles, or of their scoring system, we can discover original
models with complex functions, in comparison to institutional sporting games (Sport)
(Parlebas, 1981, 1999), which turns out to be stiff and structurally uniform.
These are the distinguishing features, specific to the internal logic of sporting
game, defined, analyzed and illustrated in the lexicon, which allowed to establish
an objective comparison between the different PAS. They constitute the “identity card”
of the game and notably rely on the properties of the game system itself, opposed
to “external logic” elements, which characterize the context (public, stakes, players
characteristics,…) (Parlebas, 1981, 1999).
The author makes us discover this way that, on the basis of a rigorous analysis of
ludomotor structures, extrinsic elements of the game bring further clarifications
and enrich the understanding of TSG, from the angle of their relationship to culture
and the social environment in which they developed. Every motricity is an “ethno-motricity”
(Parlebas, 1981, 1999). The frivolousness of TSG is only an appearance: they are in
reality the mirror of the community to which they belong, and participate to the cultural
identity of each society which represents original playful patterns, linked to their
lifestyles (Lagardera and Lavega, 2003; Parlebas, 2003).
Parlebas' lexicon, directed toward the construction of scientific specific field,
covers all motor practices as a whole and bring a fundamental contribution to the
knowledge of PAS. It is an essential tool for anyone interested in motricity field,
a compulsory reference in sporting games theory. This theory represents a control
on the clearest set of situations in which we can study social action and the set
of interactions.
The question of terminology, the main element of the lexicon, must be understood in
a context of a new relevancy, the one of motor action. It refers to the construction
of a new object, without giving up the contributions of various scientific domains.
The permanent dialectic “system/acting subject,” ubiquitous in the lexicon, turns
out to be full of possibilities and allow the revelation of practices that were depreciated
for a long time, which constitutes a real revolution.
Author Contributions
The author confirms being the sole contributor of this work and has approved it for
publication.
Conflict of Interest
The author declares that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial
or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.