9
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      The cost effectiveness of combined rapid tests (Multistix) in screening for urinary tract infections.

      1 , ,
      Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Urinary tract infections (UTI) are relatively common in the urology outpatient's department and the renal transplant unit. Clinical diagnosis is imprecise and laboratory methods take time and are costly. Combined rapid tests (Multistix) were used to screen 400 consecutive mid stream specimens of urine: 200 from urology outpatients and 200 from renal transplant patients. All specimens were also tested in the laboratory. The negative predictive value for excluding UTI was excellent (> 98%) but positive predictive value for confirming presence of UTI was only 50%. However, with this simple screening method, up to 75% of urines can be excluded from laboratory analysis. Since there is a 20-fold difference in cost between dipstix and laboratory testing, the potential savings from this simple screening test is considerable.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          J R Soc Med
          Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine
          0141-0768
          0141-0768
          Nov 1994
          : 87
          : 11
          Affiliations
          [1 ] Department of Surgery, Hammersmith Hospital, London, UK.
          Article
          1294936
          7837191
          b332c699-99d7-4039-bb91-e122356c7f44
          History

          Comments

          Comment on this article