43
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Adding insulin glargine vs. NPH insulin to metformin results in a more efficient postprandial β-cell protection in individuals with type 2 diabetes

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Aim:

          Postprandial release of intact proinsulin (IP) is an independent marker for β-cell dysfunction in patients with type 2 diabetes. This open-label, parallel-group, two-arm, pilot study compared the β-cell protective effect of adding insulin glargine (GLA) vs. NPH insulin to ongoing metformin.

          Material and methods:

          Overall, 28 insulin-naive type 2 diabetes subjects (mean ± SD age, 61.5 ± 6.7 years; diabetes duration, 9.8 ± 6.5 years; HbA1c, 7.1 ± 0.5%; BMI, 30.7 ± 4.3 kg/m 2) treated with metformin and sulfonylurea were randomized to add once-daily GLA or NPH at bedtime. At baseline and after 3 months, subjects received a standardized breakfast, lunch and dinner, with pre- and postprandial blood sampling to measure plasma IP, total insulin and blood glucose (BG).

          Results:

          Insulin dose after 3 months was comparable in both groups (GLA vs. NPH: 23.6 ± 13.4 vs. 23.3 ± 12.7; p = NS ). Both treatments significantly reduced fasting BG levels (GLA: 158 ± 19 to 121 ± 23 mg/dl; NPH: 156 ± 34 to 119 ± 29 mg/dl; both p < 0.01 vs. baseline). Fasting and postprandial BG levels did not differ between groups. IP levels decreased in both groups (p < 0.05 at all timepoints). Although IP release after breakfast did not differ between treatments, GLA induced a greater reduction in IP release after lunch (p = 0.08) and dinner (p = 0.04). Total plasma insulin levels did not differ between groups.

          Conclusions:

          Adding basal insulin to metformin reduces postprandial β-cell load. While GLA and NPH had comparable effects at breakfast, GLA reduces β-cell stress more effectively at dinner, and with a trend at lunch, most probably because of its longer lasting pharmacodynamic profile.

          Related collections

          Most cited references24

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of subcutaneous injection of long-acting human insulin analog glargine, NPH insulin, and ultralente human insulin and continuous subcutaneous infusion of insulin lispro.

          To compare the pharmacokinetics/dynamics of the long-acting insulin analog glargine with NPH, ultralente, and continuous subcutaneous (SC) infusion of insulin lispro (continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion [CSII]), 20 C-peptide-negative type 1 diabetic patients were studied on four occasions during an isoglycemic 24-h clamp. Patients received SC injection of either 0.3 U/kg glargine or NPH insulin (random sequence, crossover design). On two subsequent occasions, they received either an SC injection of ultralente (0.3 U/kg) or CSII (0.3 U x kg(-1) x 24 h(-1)) (random sequence, crossover design). After SC insulin injection or CSII, intravenous (IV) insulin was tapered, and glucose was infused to clamp plasma glucose at 130 mg/dl for 24 h. Onset of action (defined as reduction of IV insulin >50%) was earlier with NPH (0.8 +/- 0.2 h), CSII (0.5 +/- 0.1 h), and ultralente (1 +/- 0.2 h) versus glargine (1.5 +/- 0.3 h) (P 150 mg/dl) occurred later with glargine (22 +/- 4 h) than with NPH (14 +/- 3 h) (P < 0.05) but was similar with ultralente (20 +/- 6 h). NPH and ultralente exhibited a peak concentration and action (at 4.5 +/- 0.5 and 10.1 +/- 1 h, respectively) followed by waning, whereas glargine had no peak but had a flat concentration/action profile mimicking CSII. Interindividual variability (calculated as differences in SD of plasma insulin concentrations and glucose infusion rates in different treatments) was lower with glargine than with NPH and ultralente (P < 0.05) but was similar with glargine and CSII (NS). In conclusion, NPH and ultralente are both peak insulins. Duration of action of ultralente is greater, but intersubject variability is also greater than that of NPH. Glargine is a peakless insulin, it lasts nearly 24 h, it has lower intersubject variability than NPH and ultralente, and it closely mimics CSII, the gold standard of basal insulin replacement.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Fasting intact proinsulin is a highly specific predictor of insulin resistance in type 2 diabetes.

            In later stages of type 2 diabetes, proinsulin and proinsulin-like molecules are secreted in increasing amounts with insulin. A recently introduced chemiluminescence assay is able to detect the uncleaved "intact" proinsulin and differentiate it from proinsulin-like molecules. This investigation explored the predictive value of intact proinsulin as an insulin resistance marker. In total, 48 patients with type 2 diabetes (20 women and 28 men, aged 60 +/- 9 years [means +/- SD], diabetes duration 5.1 +/- 3.8 years, BMI 31.2 +/- 4.8 kg/m2, and HbA1c 6.9 +/- 1.2%) were studied by means of an intravenous glucose tolerance test and determination of fasting values of intact proinsulin, insulin, resistin, adiponectin, and glucose. Insulin resistance was determined by means of minimal model analysis (MMA) (as the gold standard) and homeostatis model assessment (HOMA). There was a significant correlation between intact proinsulin values and insulin resistance (MMA P 10 pmol/l) showed a very high specificity (MMA 100% and HOMA 92.9%) and a moderate sensitivity (MMA 48.6% and HOMA 47.1%) as marker for insulin resistance. Adiponectin values were slightly lower in the insulin resistant group, but no correlation to insulin resistance could be detected for resistin in the cross-sectional design. Elevated intact proinsulin seems to indicate an advanced stage of beta-cell exhaustion and is a highly specific marker for insulin resistance. It might be used as arbitrary marker for the therapeutic decision between secretagogue, sensitizer, or insulin therapy in type 2 diabetes.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              The importance of the beta-cell in the pathogenesis of type 2 diabetes mellitus.

              S. J. Kahn (2000)
              beta-cell dysfunction and insulin resistance are two central, interrelated defects in the pathophysiology of type 2 diabetes. By the time a patient's hyperglycemia is recognized, disruption of the normal relationship between beta-cell function and insulin sensitivity is already well established. The pathophysiology and progression of defects in glucose metabolism from normal glucose tolerance to impaired glucose tolerance to frank type 2 diabetes have been studied extensively. Insulin sensitivity has wide intersubject variability, and many individuals at risk for type 2 diabetes are insulin resistant. beta-cell changes in patients with type 2 diabetes include defects in insulin secretion, proinsulin conversion to insulin, and amyloid deposition in the islet. Studies in several ethnic groups have established that the progression from normal glucose tolerance to frank type 2 diabetes results from a gradual deterioration in beta-cell function in the presence of insulin resistance. Furthermore, the recently completed landmark United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study demonstrated that type 2 diabetes is a progressive disease and that this progression is due to declining beta-cell function.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Diabetes Obes Metab
                dom
                Diabetes, Obesity & Metabolism
                Blackwell Publishing Ltd
                1462-8902
                1463-1326
                May 2010
                : 12
                : 5
                : 437-441
                Affiliations
                [1 ]simpleInstitute for Clinical Research and Development, Clinical Department Mainz, Germany
                [2 ]simpleJohannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Department of Endocrinology Mainz, Germany
                [3 ]simpleSanofi-aventis, Medical Department Berlin, Germany
                Author notes
                Prof. Thomas Forst, Department of Endocrinology, Institute for Clinical Research and Development, University Mainz, Parcusstrasse 8, D-55116 Mainz, Germany. E-mail: ThomasF@ 123456ikfe.de

                Re-use of this article is permitted in accordance with the Terms and Conditions set out at http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/authorresources/onlineopen.html

                Article
                10.1111/j.1463-1326.2010.01209.x
                2871167
                20415692
                b35a4209-f703-479c-92f8-2afba541ba93
                © 2010 Blackwell Publishing Ltd

                Re-use of this article is permitted in accordance with the Creative Commons Deed, Attribution 2.5, which does not permit commercial exploitation.

                History
                : 23 November 2009
                : 24 December 2009
                : 19 January 2010
                Categories
                Original Articles

                Endocrinology & Diabetes
                intact proinsulin,nph insulin,beta cell stress,insulin glargine
                Endocrinology & Diabetes
                intact proinsulin, nph insulin, beta cell stress, insulin glargine

                Comments

                Comment on this article