12
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Targeting Technology in Underserved Adults With Type 1 Diabetes: Effect of Diabetes Practice Transformations on Improving Equity in CGM Prescribing Behaviors

      research-article
      , ,
      Diabetes Care
      American Diabetes Association

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          OBJECTIVE

          Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) is associated with improved outcomes in type 1 diabetes, but racial-ethnic disparities exist in use. We were interested in examining whether addressing structural health care barriers would change provider prescribing behaviors to make CGM access more equitable.

          RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

          From January 2019 to December 2021, we used multilevel stakeholder input to develop and implement several non-grant-funded practice transformations targeted toward equity, which included 1) developing a type 1 diabetes clinic, 2) conducting social needs assessments and management, 3) training support staff to place trial CGMs at the point of care, 4) optimizing prescription workflows, and 5) educating providers on CGM. Transformations were prioritized based on feasibility, acceptability, and sustainability. To examine effect on prescribing behaviors, we collected monthly aggregate data from the electronic medical record and performed multiple linear regression to examine and compare change in CGM prescriptions over the 3 years of transformation.

          RESULTS

          In total, we included 1,357 adults with type 1 diabetes in the analysis (mean ± SD age 38 ± 18 years; 30% Black [ n = 406], 45% Hispanic [ n = 612], 12% White [ n = 164]; and 74% publicly insured [ n = 1,004]). During the period of transformation, CGM prescription rates increased overall from 15% to 69% ( P < 0.001). Improvements were seen equally among Black (12% to 72%), Hispanic (15% to 74%), and White adults (20% to 48%) (between-group P = 0.053).

          CONCLUSIONS

          Diabetes practice transformations that target equity, offload provider burdens, and focus on feasible sustainable stakeholder-driven solutions can have powerful effects on provider prescribing behaviors to reduce root causes of inequity in CGM among underserved adults with type 1 diabetes. Continued focus is needed on upstream determinants of downstream CGM use.

          Related collections

          Most cited references28

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Effect of Continuous Glucose Monitoring on Glycemic Control in Adolescents and Young Adults With Type 1 Diabetes: A Randomized Clinical Trial

          Adolescents and young adults with type 1 diabetes exhibit the worst glycemic control among individuals with type 1 diabetes across the lifespan. Although continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) has been shown to improve glycemic control in adults, its benefit in adolescents and young adults has not been demonstrated.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Continuous glucose monitoring and intensive treatment of type 1 diabetes.

            The value of continuous glucose monitoring in the management of type 1 diabetes mellitus has not been determined. In a multicenter clinical trial, we randomly assigned 322 adults and children who were already receiving intensive therapy for type 1 diabetes to a group with continuous glucose monitoring or to a control group performing home monitoring with a blood glucose meter. All the patients were stratified into three groups according to age and had a glycated hemoglobin level of 7.0 to 10.0%. The primary outcome was the change in the glycated hemoglobin level at 26 weeks. The changes in glycated hemoglobin levels in the two study groups varied markedly according to age group (P=0.003), with a significant difference among patients 25 years of age or older that favored the continuous-monitoring group (mean difference in change, -0.53%; 95% confidence interval [CI], -0.71 to -0.35; P<0.001). The between-group difference was not significant among those who were 15 to 24 years of age (mean difference, 0.08; 95% CI, -0.17 to 0.33; P=0.52) or among those who were 8 to 14 years of age (mean difference, -0.13; 95% CI, -0.38 to 0.11; P=0.29). Secondary glycated hemoglobin outcomes were better in the continuous-monitoring group than in the control group among the oldest and youngest patients but not among those who were 15 to 24 years of age. The use of continuous glucose monitoring averaged 6.0 or more days per week for 83% of patients 25 years of age or older, 30% of those 15 to 24 years of age, and 50% of those 8 to 14 years of age. The rate of severe hypoglycemia was low and did not differ between the two study groups; however, the trial was not powered to detect such a difference. Continuous glucose monitoring can be associated with improved glycemic control in adults with type 1 diabetes. Further work is needed to identify barriers to effectiveness of continuous monitoring in children and adolescents. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00406133.) 2008 Massachusetts Medical Society
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Understanding the sources of diabetes distress in adults with type 1 diabetes.

              To identify the unique sources of diabetes distress (DD) for adults with type 1 diabetes (T1D).
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Diabetes Care
                Diabetes Care
                diabetes care
                Diabetes Care
                American Diabetes Association
                0149-5992
                1935-5548
                October 2022
                19 September 2022
                19 September 2022
                : 45
                : 10
                : 2231-2237
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Fleischer Institute for Diabetes and Metabolism, Albert Einstein College of Medicine-Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY
                [2 ]NY Regional Center for Diabetes Translation Research, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY
                Author notes
                Corresponding author: Shivani Agarwal, shivani.agarwal@ 123456einsteinmed.edu
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9495-677X
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4506-3702
                Article
                220555
                10.2337/dc22-0555
                9649356
                36054022
                b35a85a0-f45d-496b-956d-2a0847f0da70
                © 2022 by the American Diabetes Association

                Readers may use this article as long as the work is properly cited, the use is educational and not for profit, and the work is not altered. More information is available at https://www.diabetesjournals.org/journals/pages/license.

                History
                : 20 March 2022
                : 10 July 2022
                Funding
                Funded by: National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive Kidney Diseases;
                Award ID: 5K23DK115896
                Award ID: P30DK111022
                Categories
                Clinical Care/Education/Nutrition/Psychosocial Research

                Endocrinology & Diabetes
                Endocrinology & Diabetes

                Comments

                Comment on this article