3
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      SVM or deep learning? A comparative study on remote sensing image classification

      , , ,
      Soft Computing
      Springer Nature

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Related collections

          Most cited references16

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Extracting and composing robust features with denoising autoencoders

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Classification of hyperspectral remote sensing images with support vector machines

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Learning hierarchical features for scene labeling.

              Scene labeling consists of labeling each pixel in an image with the category of the object it belongs to. We propose a method that uses a multiscale convolutional network trained from raw pixels to extract dense feature vectors that encode regions of multiple sizes centered on each pixel. The method alleviates the need for engineered features, and produces a powerful representation that captures texture, shape, and contextual information. We report results using multiple postprocessing methods to produce the final labeling. Among those, we propose a technique to automatically retrieve, from a pool of segmentation components, an optimal set of components that best explain the scene; these components are arbitrary, for example, they can be taken from a segmentation tree or from any family of oversegmentations. The system yields record accuracies on the SIFT Flow dataset (33 classes) and the Barcelona dataset (170 classes) and near-record accuracy on Stanford background dataset (eight classes), while being an order of magnitude faster than competing approaches, producing a $(320\times 240)$ image labeling in less than a second, including feature extraction.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Soft Computing
                Soft Comput
                Springer Nature
                1432-7643
                1433-7479
                December 2017
                July 12 2016
                December 2017
                : 21
                : 23
                : 7053-7065
                Article
                10.1007/s00500-016-2247-2
                b3b1674d-82c9-4ecb-ae61-f3032588cd44
                © 2017

                http://www.springer.com/tdm

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article