90
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    16
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Associations of Ultrasonographic Features with Scrotal Pain after Vasectomy

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Purpose

          Scrotal discomfort is a recognized complication of vasectomy, but the natural history and incidence of this problem are uncertain. The typical ultrasonographic changes after a vasectomy primarily include epididymal thickening and epididymal tubular ectasia with diminished blood flow in the epididymis. We prospectively studied the differences in the ultrasonographic features of the testis and epididymis between patients with and those without scrotal discomfort after vasectomy.

          Materials and Methods

          We prospectively assessed pain scores in 178 men who underwent outpatient bilateral no-scalpel vasectomy at our institution between January 2009 and December 2010. At 2 months after vasectomy, we evaluated the postoperative scrotal pain questionnaire and scrotal ultrasonographic features for patients who returned for semen analysis. On the basis of the scrotal information, we investigated the potential relationships between scrotal pain or discomfort and scrotal ultrasonographic features of both testes and epididymides.

          Results

          The average age of the 114 men was 36.3 years (range, 29 to 53 years). group 1 (n=23), which reported scrotal pain or discomfort, showed no significant mean differences in the maximal diameter of the head of the epididymis when compared with group 2 (n=91), who had no scrotal pain or discomfort. Also, the width of the body of the epididymis between the two groups showed no significant differences.

          Conclusions

          There were no significant differences in ultrasonographic features according to the presence of chronic scrotal discomfort after vasectomy. Therefore, causes of scrotal pain other than obstruction may need to be considered after vasectomy.

          Related collections

          Most cited references16

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Analysis and management of chronic testicular pain.

          A total of 45 patients was seen in consultation between May 1980 and April 1989 for chronic unilateral or bilateral orchialgia, defined as intermittent or constant testicular pain 3 months or longer in duration that significantly interferes with the daily activities of the patient so as to prompt him to seek medical attention. We analyzed 34 patients available for followup in terms of socioeconomic parameters, etiology and duration of pain, associated urological symptomatology, specific treatment and results of therapy. Of the patients 31 underwent surgical treatment after failing medical management (24 orchiectomies, 10 epididymectomies, 5 orchiopexies and 1 hydrocelectomy). Of 10 patients who underwent epididymectomy 9 underwent subsequent orchiectomy as definitive treatment. Of 15 patients who underwent inguinal orchiectomy 11 (73%) reported complete relief of pain, while 4 had partial relief. Of the 9 patients who underwent scrotal orchiectomy 5 (55%) reported complete relief of pain, 3 had partial relief and 1 denied improvement. On the basis of these results we recommend inguinal orchiectomy as the procedure of choice for the management of chronic testicular pain when conservative measures are unsuccessful.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Chronic testicular pain following vasectomy.

            The incidence of chronic testicular pain following vasectomy has not been previously assessed. We have carried out a survey by postal questionnaire and telephone interview of 172 patients 4 years after vasectomy to assess the incidence of chronic testicular pain. Significant early post-operative complications occurred in 6 patients (3.5%): 2 infection, 3 haematoma and 1 orchitis. Chronic testicular discomfort was present in 56 patients (33%), considered by 26 (15%) to be troublesome but not by the other 30 (17%). Testicular discomfort related to sexual intercourse occurred in 9 cases (5%). Of the 9 patients who had sought further medical help only 2 had had further surgery (1 an epididymectomy and 1 excision of a hydrocele). Only 3 patients regretted having had the vasectomy because of chronic pain. On ultrasound examination, epididymal cysts were a common finding on both asymptomatic and symptomatic patients following vasectomy. Prior to vasectomy, all patients should be counselled with regard to the risk of chronic testicular pain.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Vasectomy reversal for the post-vasectomy pain syndrome: a clinical and histological evaluation.

              The cause of the post-vasectomy pain syndrome is unclear. Some postulated etiologies include epididymal congestion, tender sperm granuloma and/or nerve entrapment at the vasectomy site. To our knowledge nerve proliferation has not been evaluated previously as a cause of pain. Vasectomy reversal is reportedly successful for relieving pain in some patients. We report our experience and correlate histological findings in resected vasal segments with outcome to explain the mechanism of pain in these patients. We retrospectively reviewed the records of 13 men who underwent vasectomy reversal for the post-vasectomy pain syndrome. We compared blinded histological evaluations of the vasal ends excised at vasectomy reversal in these patients with those of pain-free controls who underwent vasectomy reversal to reestablish fertility. Controls were matched to patients for the interval since vasectomy. Histological features were graded according to the degree of severity of vasitis nodosum, chronic inflammation and nerve proliferation. Mean time to pain onset after vasectomy was 2 years. Presenting symptoms included testicular pain in 9 cases, epididymal pain in 2, pain at ejaculation in 4 and pain during intercourse in 8. Physical examination demonstrated tender epididymides in 6 men, full epididymides in 6, a tender vasectomy site in 4 and a palpable nodule in 4. No patient had testicular tenderness on palpation. Unilateral and bilateral vasovasostomy was performed in 3 and 10 of the 13 patients, respectively. Postoperatively 9 of the 13 men (69%) became completely pain-free. Mean followup was 1.5 years. We observed no differences in vasectomy site histological features in patients with the post-vasectomy pain syndrome and matched controls, and no difference in histological findings in patients with the post-vasectomy pain syndrome who did and did not become pain-free postoperatively. No histological features aid in identifying a cause of pain or provide prognostic value for subsequent pain relief. Vasectomy reversal appeared to be beneficial for relieving pain in the majority of select patients with the post-vasectomy pain syndrome.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Korean J Urol
                KJU
                Korean Journal of Urology
                The Korean Urological Association
                2005-6737
                2005-6745
                November 2011
                17 November 2011
                : 52
                : 11
                : 782-786
                Affiliations
                Department of Urology, National Police Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
                Author notes
                Corresponding Author: Seung Tae Lee. Department of Urology, National Police Hospital, 58, Garakbon-dong, Songpa-gu, Seoul 138-708, Korea. TEL: +82-2-3400-1264, FAX: +82-2-431-3192, lstpsy@ 123456naver.com
                Article
                10.4111/kju.2011.52.11.782
                3242993
                22195269
                b3eb89f7-4e63-4681-acba-260852cb5f25
                © The Korean Urological Association, 2011

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 10 June 2011
                : 25 July 2011
                Categories
                Original Article
                Infection/Inflammation

                Urology
                vasectomy,epididymis,color doppler ultrasonography
                Urology
                vasectomy, epididymis, color doppler ultrasonography

                Comments

                Comment on this article