Blog
About

9
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Optimized digital counting colonies of clonogenic assays using ImageJ software and customized macros: comparison with manual counting.

      International Journal of Radiation Biology

      methods, Breast Neoplasms, Tumor Stem Cell Assay, Software, Linear Models, Humans, Female, Dose-Response Relationship, Radiation, radiation effects, Cell Survival, Cell Line, Tumor, Calibration, radiotherapy, pathology

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          To develop a digital method for counting colonies that highly replicates manual counting. Breast cancer cells were treated with trastuzumab-conjugated gold nanoparticles in combination with X-ray irradiation, (111)In labeled trastuzumab, or γ-radiation, followed by clonogenic assays. Colonies were counted manually or digitally using ImageJ software with customized macros. Key parameters, intensity threshold and minimum colony size, were optimized based on three preliminary manual counts or blindly chosen. The correlation of digital and manual counting and inter- and intra-experimenter variability were examined by linear regression. Survival curves derived from digital and manual counts were compared by F-test (P < 0.05). Using optimized parameters, digital counts corresponded linearly to manual counts with slope (S) and R(2) value close to 1 and a small y-intercept (y(0)): SK-BR-3 (S = 0.96 ± 0.02, R(2) = 0.969, y(0) = 5.9 ± 2.2), MCF-7/HER2-18 (S = 0.98 ± 0.03, R(2) = 0.952, y(0) = 0.74 ± 0.47), and MDA-MB-231 cells (S = 1.00 ± 0.02, R(2) = 0.995, y(0) = 3.3 ± 4.5). Both reproducibility and repeatability of digital counts were better than the manual method. Survival curves generated from digital and manual counts were not significantly different; P-values were 0.3646 for SK-BR-3 cells and 0.1818 for MCF-7/HER2-18 cells. Using blind parameters, survival curves generated by both methods showed some differences: P-values were 0.0897 for SK-BR-3 cells and 0.0024 for MCF-7/HER2-18 cells. The colony counting using ImageJ and customized macros with optimized parameters was a reliable method for quantifying the number of colonies.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          21913819
          10.3109/09553002.2011.622033

          Comments

          Comment on this article