5
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
3 collections
    0
    shares

      Submit your digital health research with an established publisher
      - celebrating 25 years of open access

      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Authors’ Response to Peer Reviews of “The Exchange of Informational Support in Online Health Communities at the Onset of the COVID-19 Pandemic: Content Analysis”

      author-comment

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Related collections

          Most cited references3

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          The Exchange of Informational Support in Online Health Communities at the Onset of the COVID-19 Pandemic: Content Analysis

          Background Online health communities (OHCs) provide social support for ongoing health-related problems. COVID-19, the disease caused by SARS-CoV-2, has been an acute and substantial stressor worldwide. The disease and its impact, especially in the beginning phases, left many people with questions about the nature, treatment, and prevention of COVID-19. Unlike typical chronic ailments discussed on OHCs, which are more established, COVID-19, at least at the onset of the pandemic, is distinct in that it lacks a consensus of clinical diagnosis and an existing community foundation. Objective The study aims to investigate a newly formed OHC for COVID-19 to determine the topics and types of information exchange as well as the sources of information this community referenced during the early phases of the COVID-19 pandemic in the United States. Methods A total of 357 posts from a COVID-19 OHC on the MedHelp platform were annotated according to an open-coding process. Participants’ engagement patterns, topics of posts, and sources of information were quantified. Results Participants who offered informational support had a significantly higher percentage of responding more than once than those seeking information ( P <.001). Among the information-seeking topics, symptoms and public health practice and psychological impacts were the most frequently discussed, with 26% (17/65) and 15% (10/65) of posts, respectively. Most informational support was expressed through feedback/opinion (181/220, 82.3%). Additionally, the most frequently referenced source of information was news outlets/websites, at 55% (11/20). Governmental websites were referenced less frequently. Conclusions The trends of this community could be useful in prioritizing public health responses to address the most common questions asked by the public during crisis communication and in identifying which venue of communication is most effective in reaching a public audience during such times.
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            Peer Review of “The Exchange of Informational Support in Online Health Communities at the Onset of the COVID-19 Pandemic: Content Analysis”

              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Peer Review of “The Exchange of Informational Support in Online Health Communities at the Onset of the COVID-19 Pandemic: Content Analysis”

              (2021)

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                JMIRx Med
                JMIRx Med
                JMIRxMed
                JMIRx Med
                JMIR Publications (Toronto, Canada )
                2563-6316
                Jul-Sep 2021
                22 July 2021
                22 July 2021
                : 2
                : 3
                : e31329
                Affiliations
                [1 ] College of Medicine Drexel University Philadelphia, PA United States
                [2 ] College of Computing and Informatics Drexel University Philadelphia, PA United States
                Author notes
                Corresponding Author: Christopher C Yang chris.yang@ 123456drexel.edu
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6159-6157
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9131-1183
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5463-6926
                Article
                v2i3e31329
                10.2196/31329
                10414348
                b41c760d-d2ab-4913-84f3-e66117fe462b
                ©Wesley Jong, Ou Stella Liang, Christopher C Yang. Originally published in JMIRx Med (https://med.jmirx.org), 22.07.2021.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIRx Med, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on https://med.jmirx.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.

                History
                : 21 June 2021
                : 21 June 2021
                Categories
                Authors’ Response to Peer Reviews
                Authors’ Response to Peer Reviews

                covid-19,health information,informational support,online health,online health communities,online platform,pandemic,social support

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                Related Documents Log