7
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Effect of intrathecal catheterisation on incidence of postdural puncture headache after accidental dural puncture in non-obstetric patients

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background and Aims:

          After accidental dural puncture (ADP) with large bore epidural needles, postdural puncture headache (PDPH) develops in 16%–86% of patients, which is unpleasant and interferes with activities of daily life of the patient. Hence we aimed to assess the effect of intrathecal catheter insertion after ADP with 18G Tuohy needle on incidence of PDPH.

          Material and Methods:

          In all, 173 patients after ADP were enrolled and divided into two groups according to the choice of treating anesthesiologist. Group IC included 74 patients who had intrathecal catheter placed in subarachnoid space. In group NIC, which included 99 patients, one of the following was done: epidural catheter was cited in a different intervertebral space, or the procedure was abandoned and general anesthesia was administered or single-shot spinal anesthesia was administered through the Tuohy needle itself. The catheters were left in situ for 36–48 h. Patients were monitored for the next 7 days after ADP for the incidence of PDPH, its severity and requirement of analgesics, and duration of catheter in situ from the time of ADP.

          Results:

          The incidence of PDPH in group IC was 36% in comparison to 59% in group NIC ( P = 0.001). The severity of PDPH and requirement of analgesics was significantly less in group IC.

          Conclusion:

          Insertion of intrathecal catheter at the site of ADP significantly reduces the incidence and severity of PDPH.

          Related collections

          Most cited references21

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Prevention of postdural puncture headache after accidental dural puncture: a quantitative systematic review.

          No clear consensus exists on how to best prevent severe headache from occurring after accidental dural puncture. We conducted a quantitative systematic review to identify all available evidence for the prevention of postdural puncture headache (PDPH) and included 17 studies with 1264 patients investigating prophylactic epidural blood patch (PEBP), epidural morphine, intrathecal catheters, and epidural or intrathecal saline. The relative risk (RR) for headache after PEBP was 0.48 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.23-0.99] in five non-randomized controlled trials (non-RCTs) and 0.32 (0.10-1.03) in four randomized controlled trials (RCTs). The RR for epidural morphine (based on a single RCT) was 0.25 (0.08-0.78). All other interventions were based on non-RCTs and failed statistical significance, including long-term intrathecal catheters with an RR of 0.21 (0.02-2.65). There are a number of promising options to prevent PDPH, yet heterogeneity between the studies and publication bias towards small non-RCTs with positive results limits the available evidence. Thus, a large multicentre RCT is needed to determine the best preventative practices.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Ten years of experience with accidental dural puncture and post-dural puncture headache in a tertiary obstetric anaesthesia department.

            Accidental dural puncture (ADP) and post-dural puncture headache (PDPH) are important complications of obstetric regional anaesthesia. Between January 1997 and October 2006 in our tertiary obstetric referral centre 17 198 neuraxial blocks were recorded; 965 epidural, 16193 combined spinal-epidural and 40 spinal. Records of all parturients who experienced either ADP or PDPH were reviewed. There were 89 ADPs (0.5%), 55 observed and 34 in which PDPH followed unrecognised dural puncture. Following known ADP, 28 women had epidural catheters re-sited at a different lumbar interspace and 27 had intrathecal catheters for at least 24 h. Thirty-one women developed PDPH after observed ADP; the incidence of PDPH was similar after puncture with needle and catheter, after epidural and CSE techniques, after 27- and 29-gauge pencil-point spinal needles and after spinal and epidural catheter insertion (61% vs 52%; P>0.05). All headaches presented within 72 h. A blood patch was needed in 26/55 women after known ADP and 27/34 unrecognised ADP. A repeat blood patch was needed in 8 (15%). The incidence of ADP, PDPH, blood patching and repeat blood patching is similar to previous studies. Many ADPs are unrecognised during epidural insertion. CSE does not appear to increase the risk of ADP or PDPH; 29-gauge rather than 27-gauge pencil-point spinal needles conferred no benefit. Inserting the epidural catheter intrathecally did not significantly reduce the incidence of PDPH and blood patching in our series.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              North American survey of the management of dural puncture occurring during labour epidural analgesia.

              To document the range and the most common strategies for the management of the parturient with inadvertent dural puncture (DP) during labour epidural analgesia. A confidential survey form was mailed to 46 academic units in Canada and USA. The responses were compiled into Canadian, US and joint North American databases. Thirty-six centres (78%) responded, representing 137,250 annual deliveries. The reported incidence of DP was 0.04-6%. The most common initial response to DP was resiting the catheter at another level. Most centres made little change in routine practice regarding epidural top-ups and infusion rates after DP. Unrestricted mobilisation was advocated by 86% of centres following delivery; enhanced oral hydration was encouraged by 61%. Prophylactic epidural blood patch (PEBP) was recommended by 37% of centres, with twice as many US as Canadian centres doing so. In the presence of PDPH, EBP was offered most commonly at or within 24 hr of diagnosis. Complications were common after EBP: 86% of centres reported patch failures; 44% reported persistent headache after > or = 2 EBP. Despite this, centres remained optimistic about EBP success, quoting cure rates > 90% in 58% of centres. There is little difference between the practices reported by Canadian or US centres. The expressed optimism regarding the efficacy of EBP is not supported by the evidence available and may be unwarranted. More research is needed to define the issue better.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol
                J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol
                JOACP
                Journal of Anaesthesiology, Clinical Pharmacology
                Wolters Kluwer - Medknow (India )
                0970-9185
                2231-2730
                Jan-Mar 2019
                : 35
                : 1
                : 49-52
                Affiliations
                [1]Department of Anaesthesia and Critical Care, Lady Hardinge Medical College, New Delhi, India
                Author notes
                Address for correspondence: Dr. Prateek Ahuja, Department of Anaesthesia and Critical Care, Lady Hardinge Medical College, New Delhi, India. E-mail: drprateekahuja@ 123456gmail.com
                Article
                JOACP-35-49
                10.4103/joacp.JOACP_158_18
                6495619
                b44069fc-aa17-440b-b123-af4fa72a48c4
                Copyright: © 2019 Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology

                This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

                History
                Categories
                Original Article

                Anesthesiology & Pain management
                accidental dural puncture,anesthesia,intrathecal catheterization,postdural puncture headache,wet tap

                Comments

                Comment on this article