6
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Validity and reliability of the CAPE: a self-report instrument for the measurement of psychotic experiences in the general population.

      Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica
      Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale, statistics & numerical data, Cohort Studies, Depressive Disorder, diagnosis, epidemiology, genetics, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Middle Aged, Netherlands, Personality Assessment, Personality Inventory, Population Surveillance, Psychometrics, Psychotic Disorders, Reproducibility of Results, Risk Factors, Schizoid Personality Disorder, Schizotypal Personality Disorder

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          General population longitudinal cohort studies have demonstrated the prognostic validity of self-reported psychotic experiences, but data on reliability and cross-validation with interview-based measures of these experiences are sparse. This study tested the reliability and validity of the Community Assessment of Psychic Experiences (CAPE42). At baseline, the CAPE42 was used to measure the subclinical psychosis phenotype in a general population sample (n = 765). At follow-up (mean interval: 7.7 months), the Structured Interview for Schizotypy, Revised (SIS-R), the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS), and the CAPE42 were administered (n = 510). Baseline self-reported dimensions of psychosis were specifically and independently associated with their equivalent interview-based dimension at follow-up (standardized effect sizes of 0.4-0.5) and with their equivalent self-reported measure (standardized effect sizes of 0.6-0.8). The results indicate that self-reported dimensions of psychotic experiences in general population samples appear to be stable, reliable and valid.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Comments

          Comment on this article