23
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Reduced body mass, food intake, and testis size in response to short photoperiod in adult F344 rats

      research-article
      1 , 1 ,
      BMC Physiology
      BioMed Central

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Although laboratory rats are often considered classic nonseasonal breeders, peripubertal rats of two inbred strains, F344 and BN, have both reproductive and nonreproductive responses to short photoperiods. Unmanipulated adult rats have not been reported to have robust responses to short photoperiod alone, although several treatments can induce photoperiodic responses in adults. In this study, we tested the hypotheses that unmanipulated F344 rats retain responses to short photoperiod as adults and that they have the necessary elements for an endogenous circannual rhythm of sensitivity to short photoperiod.

          Results

          Relative to rats kept in long photoperiods (L16:D8), adult F344 rats transferred at 4.5 months of age to short photoperiods (L8:D16) had significantly lower testis size, food intake, and body weight. In a second experiment, newly weaned F344 rats underwent an initial period of inhibition of reproductive maturation, lower food intake, and lower body weight in short photoperiod or intermediate photoperiod (L12:D12) relative to rats in long photoperiod. By 18 weeks of treatment, rats in the two inhibitory photoperiods no longer differed from long photoperiod controls. In short photoperiod, rats underwent a second period of slight reproductive inhibition between weeks 35 and 48, but there was an effect on body weight and slight inhibition of food intake only in an intermediate photoperiod.

          Conclusion

          Male F344 rats retain photoresponsiveness as adults, with less reproductive inhibition but equivalent nonreproductive responses. There was only weak evidence for an endogenous timer controlling a circannual cycle of sensitivity to short photoperiod.

          Related collections

          Most cited references37

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Photoperiodic polyphenisms in rodents: neuroendocrine mechanisms, costs, and functions.

          Annual changes in daylength figure prominently in the generation of seasonal rhythms in reproduction, and a wide variety of mammals use ambient photoperiod as a proximate cue to time critical reproductive events. Nevertheless, within many reproductively photoperiodic mammalian species, there exist individuals--termed "photoperiod nonresponders"--that fail to adopt a seasonal breeding strategy and instead exhibit reproductive competence at a time of year when their conspecifics are reproductively quiescent. Photoperiod nonresponsiveness has been principally characterized by laboratory observations--over half of the species known to be reproductively photoperiodic contain a proportion of nonresponsive individuals. The study of nonresponders has generated basic insights regarding photic regulation of reproduction in mammals. The neuroendocrine mechanisms by which the short-day photoperiodic signal is degraded or lost in nonresponders varies between species: differences in features of the circadian pacemaker, which provides photoperiodic input to the reproductive neuroendocrine system, have been identified in hamsters; changes in the responsiveness of hypothalamic gonadotrophs to melatonin and as-yet-unspecified inhibitory signals have been implicated in voles and mice. Individuals that continue to breed when their conspecifics refrain might enjoy higher fitness under certain circumstances. Statements regarding the adaptive function of reproductive nonresponsiveness to photoperiod require additional information on the costs (metabolic and fitness) of sustaining reproductive function during the winter months and how these costs vary as a function of environmental conditions. Reproductive nonresponders thus continue to represent a challenge to theories that extol the adaptive function of seasonality. Several nonexclusive hypotheses are proposed to account for the maintenance of nonresponsive individuals in wild rodent populations.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Reproductive photoresponsiveness in unmanipulated male Fischer 344 laboratory rats.

            Laboratory rats are considered to be reproductively unresponsive to photoperiod because photoperiod treatments do not induce robust reproductive responses. Groups of 15 young male Fischer 344 (F344) rats were tested for effects of long (16L:8D) and short (8L:16D) photoperiods on testicular development and body mass. Two weeks of short photoperiod inhibited testicular growth, spermatogenesis, and increases in body weight. Testis size became refractory to short photoperiod after 8 wk, but the body weight was lower in short photoperiod for the full 10 wk of the study. In young Harlan Sprague-Dawley rats, in contrast, long and short photoperiod had no effect on either body weight or testis size. Pinealectomized F344 rats had significantly higher body weights and larger testes than did sham-operated controls, suggesting that the effects of photoperiod are mediated, at least in part, by the pineal gland. The F344 strain of laboratory rats is the first in which unmanipulated animals have been found to be robustly affected by photoperiod, indicating that this strain could be a valuable new model for the study of reproductive regulation by photoperiod.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Photoperiodic control of seasonal body weight cycles in hamsters.

              Syrian (Mesocricetus auratus) and Siberian (Phodopus sungorus sungorus) hamsters exhibit seasonal changes in body weight mainly by altering their carcass lipid stores. These seasonal changes are triggered largely by the photoperiod. Although both species exhibit gonadal regression when exposed to short photoperiods ("winterlike") daylength), they show opposite body weight changes. Syrian hamsters gain weight, but Siberian hamsters lose weight following short photoperiod exposure. Syrian hamsters prepare for overwintering by increasing energy stored as carcass lipid. In contrast, Siberian hamsters decrease their metabolic mass and therefore require lower energy intake for energy maintenance. In Syrian, and perhaps Siberian hamsters the short day-induced weight changes are exaggerated by high fat diets. Both species show photoperiod-induced changes in body weight without changing their food intake, suggesting a metabolic basis for these effects. In Syrian hamsters, the obesity is not secondary to gonadal regression, whereas in Siberian hamsters, the decrease in body weight is independent of the gonads for males but may be dependent upon the gonads in females. The pineal gland and its hormone, melatonin, are important transducers of photoperiodic signals in hamsters. This is certainly true for Siberian hamsters, in which pinealectomy blocks the short day-induced body weight loss. In contrast, pinealectomy has little effect on short day-induced weight gain in Syrian hamsters. Nevertheless, in both species, the body weight and gonadal changes induced by short day exposure are mimicked by systemic administration of melatonin in long day-housed animals. Thus, for these two hamster species, the same hormone, melatonin, produces opposite effects on body weight but does so by affecting the same carcass component. The target sites of action for the effects of melatonin on body weight change, energy metabolism, and reproductive status are not known. However, the suprachiasmatic and paraventricular nuclei of the hypothalamus are potentially important sites of action. The target site(s) and mechanism(s) of action for the pineal/melatonin-independent effect of photoperiod on body weight in Syrian hamsters are also unknown. This photoperiodic response is highly unusual among mammals in that it is not pineal-dependent. Studies of the mechanisms underlying these body weight changes in Syrian and Siberian hamsters may provide fundamental knowledge about how environmental influences affect obesity and they may also provide insight into the various strategies for overwintering shaped by natural selection.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                BMC Physiol
                BMC Physiology
                BioMed Central (London )
                1472-6793
                2002
                22 July 2002
                : 2
                : 11
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Dept. of Biology, College of William and Mary, PO Box 8795, Williamsburg, VA 23187-8795, USA
                Article
                1472-6793-2-11
                122066
                12135532
                b4566472-6adc-46aa-8560-e77e3a0f3ab4
                Copyright © 2002 Shoemaker and Heideman; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This article is published in Open Access: verbatim copying and redistribution of this article are permitted in all media for any non-commercial purpose, provided this notice is preserved along with the article's original URL.
                History
                : 14 May 2002
                : 22 July 2002
                Categories
                Research Article

                Anatomy & Physiology
                Anatomy & Physiology

                Comments

                Comment on this article