10
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      African soil properties and nutrients mapped at 30 m spatial resolution using two-scale ensemble machine learning

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Soil property and class maps for the continent of Africa were so far only available at very generalised scales, with many countries not mapped at all. Thanks to an increasing quantity and availability of soil samples collected at field point locations by various government and/or NGO funded projects, it is now possible to produce detailed pan-African maps of soil nutrients, including micro-nutrients at fine spatial resolutions. In this paper we describe production of a 30 m resolution Soil Information System of the African continent using, to date, the most comprehensive compilation of soil samples ( \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$N \approx 150,000$$\end{document} ) and Earth Observation data. We produced predictions for soil pH, organic carbon (C) and total nitrogen (N), total carbon, effective Cation Exchange Capacity (eCEC), extractable—phosphorus (P), potassium (K), calcium (Ca), magnesium (Mg), sulfur (S), sodium (Na), iron (Fe), zinc (Zn)—silt, clay and sand, stone content, bulk density and depth to bedrock, at three depths (0, 20 and 50 cm) and using 2-scale 3D Ensemble Machine Learning framework implemented in the mlr (Machine Learning in R) package. As covariate layers we used 250 m resolution (MODIS, PROBA-V and SM2RAIN products), and 30 m resolution (Sentinel-2, Landsat and DTM derivatives) images. Our fivefold spatial Cross-Validation results showed varying accuracy levels ranging from the best performing soil pH (CCC = 0.900) to more poorly predictable extractable phosphorus (CCC = 0.654) and sulphur (CCC = 0.708) and depth to bedrock. Sentinel-2 bands SWIR (B11, B12), NIR (B09, B8A), Landsat SWIR bands, and vertical depth derived from 30 m resolution DTM, were the overall most important 30 m resolution covariates. Climatic data images—SM2RAIN, bioclimatic variables and MODIS Land Surface Temperature—however, remained as the overall most important variables for predicting soil chemical variables at continental scale. This publicly available 30-m Soil Information System of Africa aims at supporting numerous applications, including soil and fertilizer policies and investments, agronomic advice to close yield gaps, environmental programs, or targeting of nutrition interventions.

          Related collections

          Most cited references62

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Conference Proceedings: not found

          XGBoost

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Google Earth Engine: Planetary-scale geospatial analysis for everyone

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              High-resolution global maps of 21st-century forest cover change.

              Quantification of global forest change has been lacking despite the recognized importance of forest ecosystem services. In this study, Earth observation satellite data were used to map global forest loss (2.3 million square kilometers) and gain (0.8 million square kilometers) from 2000 to 2012 at a spatial resolution of 30 meters. The tropics were the only climate domain to exhibit a trend, with forest loss increasing by 2101 square kilometers per year. Brazil's well-documented reduction in deforestation was offset by increasing forest loss in Indonesia, Malaysia, Paraguay, Bolivia, Zambia, Angola, and elsewhere. Intensive forestry practiced within subtropical forests resulted in the highest rates of forest change globally. Boreal forest loss due largely to fire and forestry was second to that in the tropics in absolute and proportional terms. These results depict a globally consistent and locally relevant record of forest change.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                tom.hengl@envirometrix.net
                Journal
                Sci Rep
                Sci Rep
                Scientific Reports
                Nature Publishing Group UK (London )
                2045-2322
                17 March 2021
                17 March 2021
                2021
                : 11
                : 6130
                Affiliations
                [1 ]EnvirometriX Ltd, Wageningen, The Netherlands
                [2 ]OpenGeoHub Foundation, Wageningen, The Netherlands
                [3 ]Innovative Solutions for Decision Agriculture Ltd (iSDA), Harpenden, United Kingdom
                [4 ]MultiOne Ltd, Zagreb, Croatia
                [5 ]GRID grid.435643.3, ISNI 0000 0000 9972 1350, World Agroforestry (ICRAF), ; Nairobi, Kenya
                [6 ]GRID grid.7149.b, ISNI 0000 0001 2166 9385, Department of Geodesy and Geoinformatics, Faculty of Civil Engineering, , University of Belgrade, ; Belgrade, Serbia
                [7 ]GILAB Ltd, Belgrade, Serbia
                [8 ]International Fertilizer Association (IFA), Paris, France
                [9 ]GRID grid.418374.d, ISNI 0000 0001 2227 9389, Rothamsted Research, ; Harpenden, United Kingdom
                [10 ]Africa Rice Center (AfricaRice), Bouaké, Côte d’Ivoire
                [11 ]International Maize and Wheat Improvement Centre (CIMMYT), Nairobi, Kenya
                [12 ]Sustainable Tropical Solutions (STS) Sarl, Yaoundéc, Cameroon
                [13 ]GRID grid.507822.a, ISNI 0000 0001 1957 6702, International Fertilizer Development Center (IFDC), ; Muscle Shoals, AL USA
                Article
                85639
                10.1038/s41598-021-85639-y
                7969779
                33731749
                b47316fd-5230-46d8-8004-3069e4ef3d2c
                © The Author(s) 2021

                Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

                History
                : 2 December 2020
                : 3 March 2021
                Categories
                Article
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2021

                Uncategorized
                geochemistry,machine learning,biogeochemistry,mineralogy,agroecology
                Uncategorized
                geochemistry, machine learning, biogeochemistry, mineralogy, agroecology

                Comments

                Comment on this article