27
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Resilience in cancer patients and how it correlates with demographics, psychological factors, and lifestyle

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Being diagnosed with cancer is challenging. Many patients wish to be actively involved in treatment and contribute to therapy, but the patients’ coping abilities and desire for involvement differ. The individual level of resilience seems to play a major role. Our study aims to learn more about the associations of resilience and factors as demographics and psychological factors.

          Methods

          This multicentric cross-sectional study was conducted in ten oncological centers in Germany in summer 2021. The questionnaire collected information on demographics, resilience, self-efficacy, general satisfaction with life, and sense of coherence. Considered lifestyle-aspects were diet and physical activity. 416 patients were included in the analyses.

          Results

          A moderate mean resilience score was achieved ( M = 69). Significant correlations in demographics were found for resilience and education ( r = 0.146, p = 0.003), income ( r = 0.205, p = 0.001), and time since receiving diagnosis ( r = − 0.115, p = 0.021). Resilience and self-efficacy correlated on a high level ( r = 0.595, p < 0.001), resilience and sense of coherence, and resilience and general satisfaction with life in a moderate way ( r = 0.339, p < 0.001; r = 0.461, p = 0.001).

          Conclusions

          Resilience portrays an important aspect in cancer treatment. Detecting patients at risk, stabilizing, or improving resilience are important to focus on and strengthen them accordingly. Possible negatively influencing factors (e.g., low self-efficacy) need to be considered. Factors affecting resilience but difficult to influence, as educational background, should be screened for. Also, the combination of low resilience and low income seems to describe a vulnerable patient group.

          Related collections

          Most cited references36

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The Satisfaction With Life Scale.

          This article reports the development and validation of a scale to measure global life satisfaction, the Satisfaction With Life Scale (SWLS). Among the various components of subjective well-being, the SWLS is narrowly focused to assess global life satisfaction and does not tap related constructs such as positive affect or loneliness. The SWLS is shown to have favorable psychometric properties, including high internal consistency and high temporal reliability. Scores on the SWLS correlate moderately to highly with other measures of subjective well-being, and correlate predictably with specific personality characteristics. It is noted that the SWLS is Suited for use with different age groups, and other potential uses of the scale are discussed.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Resilience and mental health.

            The relationship between disease and good health has received relatively little attention in mental health. Resilience can be viewed as a defence mechanism, which enables people to thrive in the face of adversity and improving resilience may be an important target for treatment and prophylaxis. Though resilience is a widely-used concept, studies vary substantially in their definition, and measurement. Above all, there is no common underlying theoretical construct to this very heterogeneous research which makes the evaluation and comparison of findings extremely difficult. Furthermore, the varying multi-disciplinary approaches preclude meta-analysis, so that clarification of research in this area must proceed firstly by conceptual unification. We attempt to collate and classify the available research around a multi-level biopsychosocial model, theoretically and semiotically comparable to that used in describing the complex chain of events related to host resistance in infectious disease. Using this underlying construct we attempt to reorganize current knowledge around a unitary concept in order to clarify and indicate potential intervention points for increasing resilience and positive mental health. 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              What predicts psychological resilience after disaster? The role of demographics, resources, and life stress.

              A growing body of evidence suggests that most adults exposed to potentially traumatic events are resilient. However, research on the factors that may promote or deter adult resilience has been limited. This study examined patterns of association between resilience and various sociocontextual factors. The authors used data from a random-digit-dial phone survey (N = 2,752) conducted in the New York City area after the September 11, 2001, terrorist attack. Resilience was defined as having 1 or 0 posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms and as being associated with low levels of depression and substance use. Multivariate analyses indicated that the prevalence of resilience was uniquely predicted by participant gender, age, race/ethnicity, education, level of trauma exposure, income change, social support, frequency of chronic disease, and recent and past life stressors. Implications for future research and intervention are discussed. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2007 APA, all rights reserved).
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                lara.festerling@uni-jena.de
                Journal
                J Cancer Res Clin Oncol
                J Cancer Res Clin Oncol
                Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology
                Springer Berlin Heidelberg (Berlin/Heidelberg )
                0171-5216
                1432-1335
                18 November 2022
                18 November 2022
                2023
                : 149
                : 8
                : 5279-5287
                Affiliations
                [1 ]GRID grid.9613.d, ISNI 0000 0001 1939 2794, Klinik für Innere Medizin II, Hämatologie und Internistische Onkologie, Universitätsklinikum Jena, , Friedrich-Schiller Universität Jena, ; Am Klinikum 1, 07747 Jena, Germany
                [2 ]GRID grid.500058.8, ISNI 0000 0004 0636 4681, Klinik für HNO-Erkrankungen, Kopf-Hals-Chirurgie, Interdisziplinäre, Palliativstation, , Südharz Klinikum Nordhausen, ; Dr.-Robert-Koch-Straße 39, 99734 Nordhausen, Germany
                [3 ]Gesundheitszentrum St. Marien GmbH, Praxis Für Hämatologie und Internistische Onkologie, Mariahilfbergweg 7, 92224 Amberg, Germany
                [4 ]Paracelsus Klinik am Schillergarten Bad Elster, Martin-Andersen-Nexö-Str. 10, 08645 Bad Elster, Germany
                [5 ]üBAG/MVZ Onkologische Kooperation Harz GbR, Kösliner Straße 14, 38642 Goslar, Germany
                [6 ]Klinik Herzoghöhe Bayreuth, Kulmbacher Straße 103, 95445 Bayreuth, Germany
                [7 ]Strahlentherapie am St. Josef Krankenhaus, Beethovenstraße 20, 65189 Wiesbaden, Germany
                [8 ]Onkologische Schwerpunktpraxis Heidelberg, Kurfürsten-Anlage 34, 69115 Heidelberg, Germany
                [9 ]GRID grid.415033.0, ISNI 0000 0004 0558 1086, Franziskus Hospital, ; Kiskerstraße 26, 33615 Bielefeld, Germany
                [10 ]Inselsberg Klinik Wicker GmbH & Co. OHG, Fischbacher Str. 36, 99891 Bad Tabarz, Germany
                [11 ]REGIOMED REHA-Klinik Masserberg GmbH, Hauptstraße 18, 98666 Masserberg, Germany
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7193-9013
                Article
                4480
                10.1007/s00432-022-04480-6
                10349752
                36396875
                b4a1bf25-fbf6-4191-a2ee-4c1d0d5b3416
                © The Author(s) 2022

                Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

                History
                : 8 October 2022
                : 11 November 2022
                Funding
                Funded by: Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena (1010)
                Categories
                Research
                Custom metadata
                © Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2023

                Oncology & Radiotherapy
                resilience,cancer,multicentric cross-sectional study,self-efficacy,general life satisfaction,sense of coherence

                Comments

                Comment on this article