41
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Fidelity to an evidence-based model for crisis resolution teams: a cross-sectional multicentre study in Norway

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Crisis resolution teams (CRTs) are specialized multidisciplinary teams intended to provide assessment and short-term outpatient or home treatment as an alternative to hospital admission for people experiencing a mental health crisis. In Norway, CRTs have been established within mental health services throughout the country, but their fidelity to an evidence-based model for CRTs has been unknown.

          Methods

          We assessed fidelity to the evidence-based CRT model for 28 CRTs, using the CORE Crisis Resolution Team Fidelity Scale Version 2, a tool developed and first applied in the UK to measure adherence to a model of optimal CRT practice. The assessments were completed by evaluation teams based on written information, interviews, and review of patient records during a one-day visit with each CRT.

          Results

          The fidelity scale was applicable for assessing fidelity of Norwegian CRTs to the CRT model. On a scale 1 to 5, the mean fidelity score was low (2.75) and with a moderate variation of fidelity across the teams. The CRTs had highest scores on the content and delivery of care subscale, and lowest on the location and timing of care subscale. Scores were high on items measuring comprehensive assessment, psychological interventions, visit length, service users’ choice of location, and of type of support. However, scores were low on opening hours, gatekeeping acute psychiatric beds, facilitating early hospital discharge, intensity of contact, providing medication, and providing practical support.

          Conclusions

          The CORE CRT Fidelity Scale was applicable and relevant to assessment of Norwegian CRTs and may be used to guide further development in clinical practice and research. Lower fidelity and differences in fidelity patterns compared to the UK teams may indicate that Norwegian teams are more focused on early interventions to a broader patient group and less on avoiding acute inpatient admissions for patients with severe mental illness.

          Related collections

          Most cited references28

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Randomised controlled trial of acute mental health care by a crisis resolution team: the north Islington crisis study.

          To evaluate the effectiveness of a crisis resolution team. Randomised controlled trial. 260 residents of the inner London Borough of Islington who were experiencing crises severe enough for hospital admission to be considered. Acute care including a 24 hour crisis resolution team (experimental group), compared with standard care from inpatient services and community mental health teams (control group). Hospital admission and patients' satisfaction. Patients in the experimental group were less likely to be admitted to hospital in the eight weeks after the crisis (odds ratio 0.19, 95% confidence interval 0.11 to 0.32), though compulsory admission was not significantly reduced. A difference of 1.6 points in the mean score on the client satisfaction questionnaire (CSQ-8) was not quite significant (P = 0.07), although it became so after adjustment for baseline characteristics (P = 0.002). Crisis resolution teams can reduce hospital admissions in mental health crises. They may also increase satisfaction in patients, but this was an equivocal finding.
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            Implementation of the Crisis Resolution Team model in adult mental health settings: a systematic review

            Background Crisis Resolution Teams (CRTs) aim to offer an alternative to hospital admission during mental health crises, providing rapid assessment, home treatment, and facilitation of early discharge from hospital. CRTs were implemented nationally in England following the NHS Plan of 2000. Single centre studies suggest CRTs can reduce hospital admissions and increase service users’ satisfaction: however, there is also evidence that model implementation and outcomes vary considerably. Evidence on crucial characteristics of effective CRTs is needed to allow team functioning to be optimised. This review aims to establish what evidence, if any, is available regarding the characteristics of effective and acceptable CRTs. Methods A systematic review was conducted. MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, CINAHL and Web of Science were searched to November 2013. A further web-based search was conducted for government and expert guidelines on CRTs. We analysed studies separately as: comparing CRTs to Treatment as Usual; comparing two or more CRT models; national or regional surveys of CRT services; qualitative studies of stakeholders’ views regarding best practice in CRTs; and guidelines from government and expert organisations regarding CRT service delivery. Quality assessment and narrative synthesis were conducted. Statistical meta-analysis was not feasible due to the variety of design of retrieved studies. Results Sixty-nine studies were included. Studies varied in quality and in the composition and activities of the clinical services studied. Quantitative studies suggested that longer opening hours and the presence of a psychiatrist in the team may increase CRTs’ ability to prevent hospital admissions. Stakeholders emphasised communication and integration with other local mental health services; provision of treatment at home; and limiting the number of different staff members visiting a service user. Existing guidelines prioritised 24-hour, seven-day-a-week CRT service provision (including psychiatrist and medical prescriber); and high quality of staff training. Conclusions We cannot draw confident conclusions about the critical components of CRTs from available quantitative evidence. Clearer definition of the CRT model is required, informed by stakeholders’ views and guidelines. Future studies examining the relationship of overall CRT model fidelity to outcomes, or evaluating the impact of key aspects of the CRT model, are desirable. Trial registration Prospero CRD42013006415. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12888-015-0441-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Assessing the Fidelity of Evidence-Based Practices: History and Current Status of a Standardized Measurement Methodology

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                torleif.ruud@medisin.uio.no
                Journal
                BMC Psychiatry
                BMC Psychiatry
                BMC Psychiatry
                BioMed Central (London )
                1471-244X
                4 May 2021
                4 May 2021
                2021
                : 21
                : 231
                Affiliations
                [1 ]GRID grid.411279.8, ISNI 0000 0000 9637 455X, Division of Mental Health Services, , Akershus University Hospital, ; Lørenskog, Norway
                [2 ]GRID grid.52522.32, ISNI 0000 0004 0627 3560, Tiller Community Mental Health Centre, Department of Mental Health, , St. Olavs Hospital, ; Trondheim, Norway
                [3 ]GRID grid.463530.7, ISNI 0000 0004 7417 509X, University of South-Eastern Norway, ; Vestfold, Norway
                [4 ]GRID grid.5510.1, ISNI 0000 0004 1936 8921, National Center for Suicide Research and Prevention, , University of Oslo, ; Oslo, Norway
                [5 ]GRID grid.83440.3b, ISNI 0000000121901201, Division of Psychiatry, , University College London, ; London, UK
                [6 ]GRID grid.5510.1, ISNI 0000 0004 1936 8921, Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, ; Oslo, Norway
                Article
                3237
                10.1186/s12888-021-03237-8
                8094557
                33947362
                b4b16c6d-a240-46b1-95d7-4a82139ea999
                © The Author(s) 2021

                Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

                History
                : 27 February 2021
                : 16 April 2021
                Categories
                Research
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2021

                Clinical Psychology & Psychiatry
                crisis resolution teams,acute,emergency,implementation,fidelity scale

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                Related Documents Log
                scite_

                Similar content71

                Cited by6

                Most referenced authors168