9
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Induction of Functional Bradykinin B 1 -Receptors in Normotensive Rats and Mice Under Chronic Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitor Treatment

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background The physiological effects of ACE inhibitors may act in part through a kinin-dependent mechanism. We investigated the effect of chronic ACE-inhibitor treatment on functional kinin B 1 - and B 2 -receptor expression, which are the molecular entities responsible for the biological effects of kinins.

          Methods and Results Rats were subjected to different 6-week treatments using various mixtures of the following agents: ACE inhibitor, angiotensin AT 1 -receptor antagonist, and B 1 - and B 2 -receptor antagonists. Chronic ACE inhibition induced both renal and vascular B 1 -receptor expression, whereas B 2 -receptor expression was not modified. Furthermore, with B 1 -receptor antagonists, it was shown that B 1 -receptor induction was involved in the hypotensive effect of ACE inhibition. Using microdissection, we prepared 10 different nephron segments and found ACE-inhibitor–induced expression of functional B 1 -receptors in all segments. ACE-inhibitor–induced B 1 -receptor induction involved homologous upregulation, because it was prevented by B 1 -receptor antagonist treatment. Finally, using B 2 -receptor knockout mice, we showed that ACE-inhibitor–induced B 1 -receptor expression was B 2 -receptor independent.

          Conclusions This study provides the first evidence that chronic ACE-inhibitor administration is associated with functional vascular and renal B 1 -receptor induction, which is involved in ACE-inhibitor–induced hypotension. The observed B 1 -receptor induction in the kidney might participate in the known renoprotective effects of ACE inhibition.

          Related collections

          Most cited references24

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The effect of angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibition on diabetic nephropathy. The Collaborative Study Group.

          Renal function declines progressively in patients who have diabetic nephropathy, and the decline may be slowed by antihypertensive drugs. The purpose of this study was to determine whether captopril has kidney-protecting properties independent of its effect on blood pressure in diabetic nephropathy. We performed a randomized, controlled trial comparing captopril with placebo in patients with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus in whom urinary protein excretion was > or = 500 mg per day and the serum creatinine concentration was or = 1.5 mg per deciliter, creatinine clearance declined at a rate of 23 +/- 25 percent per year in the captopril group and at a rate of 37 +/- 25 percent per year in the placebo group (P = 0.01). Captopril treatment was associated with a 50 percent reduction in the risk of the combined end points of death, dialysis, and transplantation that was independent of the small disparity in blood pressure between the groups. Captopril protects against deterioration in renal function in insulin-dependent diabetic nephropathy and is significantly more effective than blood-pressure control alone.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Spectrophotometric assay and properties of the angiotensin-converting enzyme of rabbit lung

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Randomised controlled trial of dual blockade of renin-angiotensin system in patients with hypertension, microalbuminuria, and non-insulin dependent diabetes: the candesartan and lisinopril microalbuminuria (CALM) study.

              To assess and compare the effects of candesartan or lisinopril, or both, on blood pressure and urinary albumin excretion in patients with microalbuminuria, hypertension, and type 2 diabetes. Prospective, randomised, parallel group, double blind study with four week placebo run in period and 12 weeks' monotherapy with candesartan or lisinopril followed by 12 weeks' monotherapy or combination treatment. Tertiary hospitals and primary care centres in four countries (37 centres). 199 patients aged 30-75 years. Candesartan 16 mg once daily, lisinopril 20 mg once daily. Blood pressure and urinary albumin:creatinine ratio. At 12 weeks mean (95% confidence interval) reductions in diastolic blood pressure were 9.5 mm Hg (7.7 mm Hg to 11.2 mm Hg, P<0.001) and 9.7 mm Hg (7.9 mm Hg to 11.5 mm Hg, P<0.001), respectively, and in urinary albumin:creatinine ratio were 30% (15% to 42%, P<0.001) and 46% (35% to 56%, P<0.001) for candesartan and lisinopril, respectively. At 24 weeks the mean reduction in diastolic blood pressure with combination treatment (16.3 mm Hg, 13.6 mm Hg to 18.9 mm Hg, P<0. 001) was significantly greater than that with candesartan (10.4 mm Hg, 7.7 mm Hg to 13.1 mm Hg, P<0.001) or lisinopril (mean 10.7 mm Hg, 8.0 mm Hg to 13.5 mm Hg, P<0.001). Furthermore, the reduction in urinary albumin:creatinine ratio with combination treatment (50%, 36% to 61%, P<0.001) was greater than with candesartan (24%, 0% to 43%, P=0.05) and lisinopril (39%, 20% to 54%, P<0.001). All treatments were generally well tolerated. Candesartan 16 mg once daily is as effective as lisinopril 20 mg once daily in reducing blood pressure and microalbuminuria in hypertensive patients with type 2 diabetes. Combination treatment is well tolerated and more effective in reducing blood pressure.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Circulation
                Circulation
                Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
                0009-7322
                1524-4539
                February 05 2002
                February 05 2002
                : 105
                : 5
                : 627-632
                Affiliations
                [1 ]From the Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale INSERM U 388, Institut Louis Bugnard, CHU Rangueil, Toulouse, France.
                Article
                10.1161/hc0502.102965
                11827930
                b4b882fd-a56a-4a03-ae88-fefd0a92e332
                © 2002
                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article