35
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Stakeholder engagement in economic evaluation: Protocol for using the nominal group technique to elicit patient, healthcare provider, and health system stakeholder input in the development of an early economic evaluation model of chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy

      other

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Introduction

          Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy is a class of immunotherapy. An economic evaluation conducted at an early stage of development of CAR-T therapy for treatment of adult relapsed or refractory acute lymphoblastic leukaemia could provide insight into factors contributing to the cost of treatment, the potential clinical benefits, and what the health system can afford. Traditionally, stakeholders are engaged in certain parts of health technology assessment processes, such as in the identification and selection of technologies, formulation of recommendations, and implementation of recommendations; however, little is known about processes for stakeholder engagement during the conduct of the assessment. This is especially the case for economic evaluations. Stakeholders, such as clinicians, policy-makers, patients, and their support networks, have insight into factors that can enhance the validity of an economic evaluation model. This research outlines a specific methodology for stakeholder engagement and represents an avenue to enhance health economic evaluations and support the use of these models to inform decision making for resource allocation. This protocol may inform a tailored framework for stakeholder engagement processes in future economic evaluation model development.

          Methods and analysis

          We will involve clinicians, healthcare researchers, payers, and policy-makers, as well as patients and their support networks in the conduct and verification of an early economic evaluation of a novel health technology to incorporate stakeholder-generated knowledge. Three stakeholder-specific focus groups will be conducted using an online adaptation of the nominal group technique to elicit considerations from each. This study will use CAR-T therapy for adults with relapsed or refractory B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukaemia as a basis for investigating broader stakeholder engagement processes.

          Ethics and dissemination

          This study received ethics approval from the Ottawa Hospital Research Institute Research Ethics Board (REB 20200320-01HT) and the results will be shared via conference presentations, peer-reviewed publications, and ongoing stakeholder engagement.

          Related collections

          Most cited references66

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Using thematic analysis in psychology

            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Tisagenlecleucel in Children and Young Adults with B-Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia

            In a single-center phase 1-2a study, the anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy tisagenlecleucel produced high rates of complete remission and was associated with serious but mainly reversible toxic effects in children and young adults with relapsed or refractory B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL).
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              A Ladder Of Citizen Participation

                Author and article information

                Journal
                BMJ Open
                BMJ Open
                bmjopen
                bmjopen
                BMJ Open
                BMJ Publishing Group (BMA House, Tavistock Square, London, WC1H 9JR )
                2044-6055
                2021
                12 August 2021
                : 11
                : 8
                : e046707
                Affiliations
                [1 ]departmentClinical Epidemiology Program , Ottawa Hospital Research Institute , Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
                [2 ]departmentSchool of Epidemiology and Public Health , University of Ottawa , Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
                [3 ]Patient Partner , Toronto, Ontario, Canada
                [4 ]departmentCancer Therapeutics Program , Ottawa Hospital Research Institute , Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
                [5 ]departmentBlood and Marrow Transplant Program , The Ottawa Hospital , Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
                [6 ]departmentDepartment of Medicine , University of Ottawa , Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
                [7 ]departmentDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine , University of Ottawa , Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
                [8 ]departmentSunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre , University of Toronto , Toronto, Ontario, Canada
                [9 ]Canadian Centre for Applied Research in Cancer Control , Toronto, Ontario, Canada
                [10 ]departmentCenter for the Evaluation of Value and Risk in Health , Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts Medical Center , Boston, Massachusetts, USA
                [11 ]departmentDepartment of Medicine , Tufts University School of Medicine , Boston, Massachusetts, USA
                Author notes
                [Correspondence to ] Dr Kednapa Thavorn; kthavorn@ 123456ohri.ca
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3265-6579
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0322-382X
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3389-2485
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2501-3057
                Article
                bmjopen-2020-046707
                10.1136/bmjopen-2020-046707
                8362692
                34385243
                b4d451ef-bff5-404f-9a26-74da1d604161
                © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

                This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See:  http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.

                History
                : 06 November 2020
                : 20 July 2021
                Funding
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100004203, Ontario Institute for Cancer Research;
                Award ID: P.HSR.202
                Funded by: BioCanRx;
                Award ID: P.HSR.202
                Categories
                Health Economics
                1506
                1701
                Protocol
                Custom metadata
                unlocked

                Medicine
                oncology,qualitative research,statistics & research methods,health economics
                Medicine
                oncology, qualitative research, statistics & research methods, health economics

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                Related Documents Log