32
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      The Power of Feedback Revisited: A Meta-Analysis of Educational Feedback Research

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          A meta-analysis (435 studies, k = 994, N > 61,000) of empirical research on the effects of feedback on student learning was conducted with the purpose of replicating and expanding the Visible Learning research ( Hattie and Timperley, 2007; Hattie, 2009; Hattie and Zierer, 2019) from meta-synthesis. Overall results based on a random-effects model indicate a medium effect ( d = 0.48) of feedback on student learning, but the significant heterogeneity in the data shows that feedback cannot be understood as a single consistent form of treatment. A moderator analysis revealed that the impact is substantially influenced by the information content conveyed. Furthermore, feedback has higher impact on cognitive and motor skills outcomes than on motivational and behavioral outcomes. We discuss these findings in the light of the assumptions made in The power of feedback ( Hattie and Timperley, 2007). In general, the results suggest that feedback has rightly become a focus of teaching research and practice. However, they also point toward the necessity of interpreting different forms of feedback as independent measures.

          Related collections

          Most cited references42

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Book: not found

          Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions

          Healthcare providers, consumers, researchers and policy makers are inundated with unmanageable amounts of information, including evidence from healthcare research. It has become impossible for all to have the time and resources to find, appraise and interpret this evidence and incorporate it into healthcare decisions. Cochrane Reviews respond to this challenge by identifying, appraising and synthesizing research-based evidence and presenting it in a standardized format, published in The Cochrane Library (www.thecochranelibrary.com).<p><i>The Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions</i> contains methodological guidance for the preparation and maintenance of Cochrane intervention reviews. Written in a clear and accessible format, it is the essential manual for all those preparing, maintaining and reading Cochrane reviews. Many of the principles and methods described here are appropriate for systematic reviews applied to other types of research and to systematic reviews of interventions undertaken by others. It is hoped therefore that this book will be invaluable to all those who want to understand the role of systematic reviews, critically appraise published reviews or perform reviews themselves.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Students' evaluations of University teaching: Research findings, methodological issues, and directions for future research

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Fixed Effects vs. Random Effects Meta-Analysis Models: Implications for Cumulative Research Knowledge

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Front Psychol
                Front Psychol
                Front. Psychol.
                Frontiers in Psychology
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                1664-1078
                22 January 2020
                2019
                : 10
                : 3087
                Affiliations
                [1] 1Department of School Pedagogy, University of Augsburg , Augsburg, Germany
                [2] 2Melbourne Graduate School of Education, University of Melbourne , Parkville, VIC, Australia
                Author notes

                Edited by: Sung-il Kim, Korea University, South Korea

                Reviewed by: Frans Prins, Utrecht University, Netherlands; Lu Wang, Ball State University, United States; Roger C. Ho, National University of Singapore, Singapore

                *Correspondence: Benedikt Wisniewski, benedikt.wisniewski@ 123456phil.uni-augsburg.de

                This article was submitted to Educational Psychology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Psychology

                Article
                10.3389/fpsyg.2019.03087
                6987456
                32038429
                b4d5aef4-50db-4f3d-98d3-a5f5fc23cbe2
                Copyright © 2020 Wisniewski, Zierer and Hattie.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 06 August 2019
                : 31 December 2019
                Page count
                Figures: 5, Tables: 3, Equations: 7, References: 67, Pages: 14, Words: 0
                Categories
                Psychology
                Review

                Clinical Psychology & Psychiatry
                feedback,student learning,student achievement,meta-analysis,teaching

                Comments

                Comment on this article