5
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Identification and Functional Testing of ERCC2 Mutations in a Multi-national Cohort of Patients with Familial Breast- and Ovarian Cancer

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The increasing application of gene panels for familial cancer susceptibility disorders will probably lead to an increased proposal of susceptibility gene candidates. Using ERCC2 DNA repair gene as an example, we show that proof of a possible role in cancer susceptibility requires a detailed dissection and characterization of the underlying mutations for genes with diverse cellular functions (in this case mainly DNA repair and basic cellular transcription). In case of ERCC2, panel sequencing of 1345 index cases from 587 German, 405 Lithuanian and 353 Czech families with breast and ovarian cancer (BC/OC) predisposition revealed 25 mutations (3 frameshift, 2 splice-affecting, 20 missense), all absent or very rare in the ExAC database. While 16 mutations were unique, 9 mutations showed up repeatedly with population-specific appearance. Ten out of eleven mutations that were tested exemplarily in cell-based functional assays exert diminished excision repair efficiency and/or decreased transcriptional activation capability. In order to provide evidence for BC/OC predisposition, we performed familial segregation analyses and screened ethnically matching controls. However, unlike the recently published RECQL example, none of our recurrent ERCC2 mutations showed convincing co-segregation with BC/OC or significant overrepresentation in the BC/OC cohort. Interestingly, we detected that some deleterious founder mutations had an unexpectedly high frequency of > 1% in the corresponding populations, suggesting that either homozygous carriers are not clinically recognized or homozygosity for these mutations is embryonically lethal. In conclusion, we provide a useful resource on the mutational landscape of ERCC2 mutations in hereditary BC/OC patients and, as our key finding, we demonstrate the complexity of correct interpretation for the discovery of “bonafide” breast cancer susceptibility genes.

          Author Summary

          Approximately 5–10% of breast/ovarian cancer (BC/OC) cases have inherited an increased risk of developing this malignancy. However, mutations in the two major breast cancer susceptibility genes BRCA1 and BRCA2 explain only 15–20% of all familial BC/OC cases. With the emergence of the high throughput NGS-technology, the number of proposed novel candidate genes for breast cancer predisposition continuously increases. However, a “bonafide” proof of cancer susceptibility requires a detailed characterization of candidate mutations, which we addressed in the current study. Using the DNA repair gene ERCC2 as an example, we performed a comprehensive multi-center approach, analyzing ERCC2 mutations in 1000+ patients with hereditary BC/OC. We identified 25 potential candidate mutations for cancer breast cancer susceptibility, some of them affecting ERCC2 functional activity in appropriate cell-culture based assays. However, a more dissected analysis showed no convincing co-segregation with BC/OC and there was no longer a significant overrepresentation in BC/OC when compared to regionally matched controls instead of the global ExAc variant data base, pointing to the relevance of founder-mutations. In conclusion, we provide a useful resource on the mutational landscape of ERCC2 mutations in hereditary BC/OC patients and, as our key finding, we highlight the complexity of correct interpretation for the discovery of “bonafide” breast cancer susceptibility genes.

          Related collections

          Most cited references27

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Two decades after BRCA: setting paradigms in personalized cancer care and prevention.

          The cloning of the breast cancer susceptibility genes BRCA1 and BRCA2 nearly two decades ago helped set in motion an avalanche of research exploring how genomic information can be optimally applied to identify and clinically care for individuals with a high risk of developing cancer. Genetic testing for mutations in BRCA1, BRCA2, and other breast cancer susceptibility genes has since proved to be a valuable tool for determining eligibility for enhanced screening and prevention strategies, as well as for identifying patients most likely to benefit from a targeted therapy. Here, we discuss the landscape of inherited mutations and sequence variants in BRCA1 and BRCA2, the complexities of determining disease risk when the pathogenicity of sequence variants is uncertain, and current strategies for clinical management of women who carry BRCA1/2 mutations.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            XPD helicase structures and activities: insights into the cancer and aging phenotypes from XPD mutations.

            Mutations in XPD helicase, required for nucleotide excision repair (NER) as part of the transcription/repair complex TFIIH, cause three distinct phenotypes: cancer-prone xeroderma pigmentosum (XP), or aging disorders Cockayne syndrome (CS), and trichothiodystrophy (TTD). To clarify molecular differences underlying these diseases, we determined crystal structures of the XPD catalytic core from Sulfolobus acidocaldarius and measured mutant enzyme activities. Substrate-binding grooves separate adjacent Rad51/RecA-like helicase domains (HD1, HD2) and an arch formed by 4FeS and Arch domains. XP mutations map along the HD1 ATP-binding edge and HD2 DNA-binding channel and impair helicase activity essential for NER. XP/CS mutations both impair helicase activity and likely affect HD2 functional movement. TTD mutants lose or retain helicase activity but map to sites in all four domains expected to cause framework defects impacting TFIIH integrity. These results provide a foundation for understanding disease consequences of mutations in XPD and related 4Fe-4S helicases including FancJ.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Incidence of DNA repair deficiency disorders in western Europe: Xeroderma pigmentosum, Cockayne syndrome and trichothiodystrophy.

              Laboratory diagnosis for DNA repair diseases has been performed in western Europe from the early seventies for xeroderma pigmentosum (XP) and from the mid-eighties for Cockayne syndrome (CS) and trichothiodystrophy (TTD). The combined data from the DNA repair diagnostic centres in France, (West) Germany, Italy, the Netherlands and the United Kingdom have been investigated for three groups of diseases: XP (including XP-variant), CS (including XP/CS complex) and TTD. Incidences in western Europe were for the first time established at 2.3 per million livebirths for XP, 2.7 per million for CS and 1.2 per million for TTD. As immigrant populations were disproportionately represented in the patients' groups, incidences were also established for the autochthonic western European population at: 0.9 per million for XP, 1.8 per million for CS and 1.1 per million for TTD. Perhaps contrary to general conceptions, compared to XP the incidence of CS appears to be somewhat higher and the incidence of TTD to be quite similar in the native West-European population.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: Editor
                Journal
                PLoS Genet
                PLoS Genet
                plos
                plosgen
                PLoS Genetics
                Public Library of Science (San Francisco, CA USA )
                1553-7390
                1553-7404
                9 August 2016
                August 2016
                : 12
                : 8
                : e1006248
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Institute for Clinical Genetics, Faculty of Medicine Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
                [2 ]German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Dresden, Germany
                [3 ]German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
                [4 ]MGZ—Medical Genetics Center, Munich, Germany
                [5 ]Clinic for Dermatology Venerology and Allergology, Göttingen, Germany
                [6 ]National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Partner Site Dresden, Germany
                [7 ]Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Germany
                [8 ]Vilnius University Hospital Santariskiu Clinics, Hematology, Oncology and Transfusion Medicine Center, Vilnius, Lithuania
                [9 ]State Research Institute Innovative Medicine Center, Vilnius, Lithuania
                [10 ]Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute, Brno, Czech Republic
                [11 ]Institute of Biochemistry and Experimental Oncology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic
                [12 ]Cologne Center for Genomics, Cologne, Germany
                [13 ]Clinic of Dermatology, Rostock, Germany
                Cleveland Clinic Genomic Medicine Institute, UNITED STATES
                Author notes

                The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

                Conceptualization: AR ABP SS BK. Data curation: AR ABP SS. Formal analysis: AR ABP SS RJ ZK EM. Funding acquisition: PW EHF SE ES BK. Investigation: AR ABP SS RJ ZK EM. Methodology: AR ABP SS RJ ZK EM BK. Project administration: BK. Resources: AR ABP SS JDK RJ LF ZK FL PZ EBK LM KH JL AN ND RO HT KK. Supervision: AR. Validation: AR ABP SS. Visualization: AR ABP SS AN. Writing - original draft: AR ABP SS JDK SE BK. Writing - review & editing: AR JDK.

                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7116-6364
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0246-1471
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2050-9667
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4181-2120
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3377-1704
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8753-8238
                Article
                PGENETICS-D-16-01272
                10.1371/journal.pgen.1006248
                4978395
                27504877
                b4e0f4bb-b375-4efe-a3e2-ec5c85fc8a47
                © 2016 Rump et al

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

                History
                : 8 June 2016
                : 18 July 2016
                Page count
                Figures: 3, Tables: 2, Pages: 18
                Funding
                The Czech-Brno study was supported by MH CZ - DRO (MMCI, 00209805) and RECAMO, CZ.1.05/2.1.00/03.0101. The Czech-Prague study was supported by Ministry of Health of the Czech Republic, grant nr. 15-28830A and projects of the Charles University in Prague PRVOUK P27 and SVV UK 260256/2016. Functional analyses were funded by the Claudia von Schilling Foundation for breast cancer research (to SS and SE). The Lithuanian study was supported by the Research Counsil of Lithuania (Project SEN18/2015). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
                Categories
                Research Article
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Genetics
                Mutation
                Frameshift Mutation
                Research and Analysis Methods
                Database and Informatics Methods
                Biological Databases
                Mutation Databases
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Genetics
                Mutation
                Mutation Databases
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Oncology
                Cancers and Neoplasms
                Breast Tumors
                Breast Cancer
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Oncology
                Cancers and Neoplasms
                Gynecological Tumors
                Ovarian Cancer
                Biology and life sciences
                Genetics
                Gene expression
                DNA transcription
                Biology and life sciences
                Genetics
                DNA
                DNA repair
                Biology and life sciences
                Biochemistry
                Nucleic acids
                DNA
                DNA repair
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Genetics
                Mutation
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Biochemistry
                Enzymology
                Enzymes
                Oxidoreductases
                Luciferase
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Biochemistry
                Proteins
                Enzymes
                Oxidoreductases
                Luciferase
                Custom metadata
                All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.

                Genetics
                Genetics

                Comments

                Comment on this article