7
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      What Makes Us Click? Demonstrating Incentives for Angry Discourse with Digital-Age Field Experiments

      The Journal of Politics
      Cambridge University Press (CUP)

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Related collections

          Most cited references29

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Visualization of an Oxygen-deficient Bottom Water Circulation in Osaka Bay, Japan

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Strong Inference: Certain systematic methods of scientific thinking may produce much more rapid progress than others.

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Anger is an approach-related affect: evidence and implications.

              The authors review a range of evidence concerning the motivational underpinnings of anger as an affect, with particular reference to the relationship between anger and anxiety or fear. The evidence supports the view that anger relates to an appetitive or approach motivational system, whereas anxiety relates to an aversive or avoidance motivational system. This evidence appears to have 2 implications. One implication concerns the nature of anterior cortical asymmetry effects. The evidence suggests that such asymmetry reflects direction of motivational engagement (approach vs. withdrawal) rather than affective valence. The other implication concerns the idea that affects form a purely positive dimension and a purely negative dimension, which reflect the operation of appetitive and aversive motivational systems, respectively. The evidence reviewed does not support that view. The evidence is, however, consistent with a discrete-emotions view (which does not rely on dimensionality) and with an alternative dimensional approach. (c) 2009 APA, all rights reserved.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                The Journal of Politics
                The Journal of Politics
                Cambridge University Press (CUP)
                0022-3816
                1468-2508
                October 2012
                October 2012
                : 74
                : 4
                : 1138-1152
                Article
                10.1017/S0022381612000540
                b4f81d01-40e2-45da-99c8-22767cec25f6
                © 2012
                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article