0
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Kinematic changes in goal-directed movements in a fear-conditioning paradigm

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          In individuals with a musculoskeletal disorder, goal-directed reaching movements of the hand are distorted. Here, we investigated a pain-related fear-conditioning effect on motor control. Twenty healthy participants (11 women and 9 men, 21.7 ± 2.7 years) performed a hand-reaching movement task. In the acquisition phase, a painful electrocutaneous stimulus was applied on the reaching hand simultaneous with the completion of reaching. In the subsequent extinction phase, the task context was the same but the painful stimulus was omitted. We divided the kinematic data of the hand-reaching movements into acceleration and deceleration periods based on the movement-velocity characteristics, and the duration of each period indicated the degree of impairment in the feedforward and feedback motor controls. We assessed the wavelet coherence between electromyograms of the triceps and biceps brachii muscles. In the acquisition phase, the durations of painful movements were significantly longer in both the acceleration and deceleration periods. In the extinction phase, painful movements were longer only in the acceleration period and higher pain expectation and fear were maintained. Similarly, the wavelet coherence of muscles in both periods were decreased in both the acquisition and extinction phases. These results indicate that negative emotional modulations might explain the altered motor functions observed in pain patients.

          Related collections

          Most cited references48

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          A Practical Guide to Wavelet Analysis

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            A two-dimensional neuropsychology of defense: fear/anxiety and defensive distance.

            We present in this paper a picture of the neural systems controlling defense that updates and simplifies Gray's "Neuropsychology of Anxiety". It is based on two behavioural dimensions: 'defensive distance' as defined by the Blanchards and 'defensive direction'. Defensive direction is a categorical dimension with avoidance of threat corresponding to fear and approach to threat corresponding to anxiety. These two psychological dimensions are mapped to underlying neural dimensions. Defensive distance is mapped to neural level, with the shortest defensive distances involving the lowest neural level (periaqueductal grey) and the largest defensive distances the highest neural level (prefrontal cortex). Defensive direction is mapped to separate parallel streams that run across these levels. A significant departure from prior models is the proposal that both fear and anxiety are represented at all levels. The theory is presented in a simplified form that does not incorporate the interactions that must occur between non-adjacent levels of the system. It also requires expansion to include the dimension of escapability of threat. Our current development and these proposed future extensions do not change the core concepts originally proposed by Gray and, we argue, demonstrate their enduring value.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              The fear-avoidance model of musculoskeletal pain: current state of scientific evidence.

              Research studies focusing on the fear-avoidance model have expanded considerably since the review by Vlaeyen and Linton (Vlaeyen J. W. S. & Linton, S. J. (2000). Fear-avoidance and its consequences in chronic musculoskeletal pain: a state of the art. Pain, 85(3), 317--332). The fear-avoidance model is a cognitive-behavioral account that explains why a minority of acute low back pain sufferers develop a chronic pain problem. This paper reviews the current state of scientific evidence for the individual components of the model: pain severity, pain catastrophizing, attention to pain, escape/avoidance behavior, disability, disuse, and vulnerabilities. Furthermore, support for the contribution of pain-related fear in the inception of low back pain, the development of chronic low back pain from an acute episode, and the maintenance of enduring pain, will be highlighted. Finally, available evidence on recent clinical applications is provided, and unresolved issues that need further exploration are discussed.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                y.nishi.pt@gmail.com
                Journal
                Sci Rep
                Sci Rep
                Scientific Reports
                Nature Publishing Group UK (London )
                2045-2322
                27 May 2021
                27 May 2021
                2021
                : 11
                : 11162
                Affiliations
                [1 ]GRID grid.448779.1, ISNI 0000 0004 1774 521X, Department of Neurorehabilitation, Graduate School of Health Sciences, , Kio University, ; 4-2-2 Umaminaka, Koryo-cho, Kitakatsuragi-gun, Nara, 635-0832 Japan
                [2 ]Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Nishiyamato Rehabilitation Hospital, Nara, Japan
                [3 ]GRID grid.448779.1, ISNI 0000 0004 1774 521X, Neurorehabilitation Research Center, Kio University, ; Nara, Japan
                [4 ]GRID grid.412708.8, ISNI 0000 0004 1764 7572, Department of Pain and Palliative Medicine, , The University of Tokyo Hospital, ; Tokyo, Japan
                [5 ]GRID grid.26999.3d, ISNI 0000 0001 2151 536X, Department of Precision Engineering, , The University of Tokyo, ; Tokyo, Japan
                Article
                90518
                10.1038/s41598-021-90518-7
                8159940
                34045515
                b5803ccc-3045-4162-8db0-2a5be070e249
                © The Author(s) 2021

                Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

                History
                : 9 March 2020
                : 10 May 2021
                Categories
                Article
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2021

                Uncategorized
                human behaviour,pain
                Uncategorized
                human behaviour, pain

                Comments

                Comment on this article