2
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Ockenden: another shocking review of maternity services

      ,
      BMJ
      BMJ

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Related collections

          Most cited references4

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          A national cohort study and confidential enquiry to investigate ethnic disparities in maternal mortality

          Background Ethnic disparities in maternal mortality were first documented in the UK in the early 2000s but are known to be widening. This project aimed to describe the women who died in the UK during or up to a year after the end of pregnancy, to compare the quality of care received by women from different aggregated ethnic groups, and to identify any structural or cultural biases or discrimination affecting their care. Methods National surveillance data was used to identify all 1894 women who died during or up to a year after the end of pregnancy between 2009 and 18 in the UK. Their characteristics and causes of death were described. A Confidential Enquiry was undertaken to describe the quality of care women received. The care of a stratified random sample of 54 women who died during or up to a year after the end of pregnancy between 2009 and 18, (18 from the aggregated group of Black women, 19 from the Asian aggregated group and 17 from the White aggregated group) was re-examined specifically to describe any structural or cultural biases or discrimination identified. Findings There were no major differences causes of death between women from different aggregated ethnic groups, with cardiovascular disease the leading cause of death in all groups. Multiple areas of bias were identified in the care women received, including lack of nuanced care (notable amongst women from Black aggregated ethnic groups who died), microaggressions (most prominent in the care of women from Asian aggregated ethnic groups who died) and clinical, social and cultural complexity (evident across all ethnic groups). Interpretation This confidential enquiry suggests that multiple structural and other biases exist in UK maternity care. Further research on the role of microaggressions is warranted. Funding This research is funded by the doi 10.13039/501100000272, National Institute for Health Research; (NIHR) Policy Research Programme, conducted through the Policy Research Unit in Maternal and Neonatal Health and Care, PR-PRU-1217–21,202. MK is an NIHR Senior Investigator. SK is part funded and FCS fully funded by the doi 10.13039/501100000272, National Institute for Health Research; (NIHR) Applied Research Centre (ARC) West Midlands. The views expressed are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the NIHR or the Department of Health and Social Care.
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Intrapartum‐related perinatal deaths in births planned in midwifery‐led settings in Great Britain: findings and recommendations from the ESMiE confidential enquiry

              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Dealing with pregnancy problems—why we all need to be part of the solution

              Better advice and support before and after pregnancy is needed from health and social care beyond maternity services For almost two decades in the UK, it has been clear that the majority of deaths of women during pregnancy, or up to six weeks after the end of pregnancy, are due to medical and mental health conditions made worse by pregnancy, or the care received as a consequence of being pregnant.1 Fewer than a third of these deaths are related directly to obstetric conditions. Yet, actions to prevent pregnancy problems still largely focus on childbirth care. At best, this work extends to antenatal and postnatal maternity services. Only with actions long before pregnancy, from health and social care services well beyond maternity, and for months and years after the end of pregnancy, can pregnancy problems truly be resolved. This effort is required from us all. The findings are similar for other high resource settings such as the US2 and Canada. Proportionately, deaths from medical and mental health conditions are increasing in low and middle income countries as efforts to provide skilled childbirth care take effect and deaths from obstetric conditions, such as postpartum haemorrhage and pre-eclampsia, are prevented. The imbalance is even greater when deaths between six weeks and a year after the end of pregnancy are considered, in which most women die from mental or physical health conditions that are not specific to pregnancy. Their outcomes, nevertheless, are adversely affected by the simple fact that they have recently been pregnant.1 We have no comparable data for severe maternal morbidity solely due to non-obstetric conditions, although for every pregnant or postpartum woman that dies, a further hundred are estimated to have a severe morbidity.3 Between 10% and 20% of women are known to experience a mental health problem during or after pregnancy.4 Complications during pregnancy are known to have adverse outcomes many years after their occurrence. In children’s education, there is an important role for awareness of the need to optimise health before conception and pregnancy. Preventable conditions, such as obesity, contribute substantially to the risk of severe morbidity in pregnancy.5 Other environmental factors before pregnancy could influence pregnancy complications, such as housing quality, air pollution, occupation, and socioeconomic circumstances. Societal norms also play a part in the occurrence of pregnancy problems; the maternal age at first childbirth is rising globally and will inevitably lead to more women entering pregnancy with pre-existing health conditions and to a consequent increase in pregnancy morbidity. These trends emphasise the importance of advice before pregnancy for women with comorbid conditions.6 That advice is required early, long before women are considering pregnancy, so that they are informed about how to optimise their health and drug treatments before pregnancy, and, importantly, are provided with contraceptive advice to enable them to delay pregnancy until a time of their choosing. A planned pregnancy will always be safer than an unplanned pregnancy in a woman with a pre-existing mental or physical health condition. Given the range of health conditions that women experience, provision of prepregnancy and contraceptive advice should be within the remit of any health professional who cares for women of reproductive age, from paediatric transition clinics onwards. Little research looks at women’s perspectives on how best to provide that advice. The UK Confidential Enquiries into Maternal Deaths repeatedly identify women with unplanned pregnancies who would not have died if they had been given appropriate contraceptive advice and had prevented their pregnancy.1 Similarly, a consistent theme identified in reviews of the care of women who die is inappropriate withdrawal of drug treatment before or in early pregnancy by clinicians or women themselves.7 We must recognise the harm inherent in the pervasive risk messaging in relation to pregnancy drug treatment from the media,8 the actions of regulatory authorities, pharmaceutical companies, and insurers. The introduction of a programme designed to prevent in utero exposure to valproate, for example, has led to increased numbers of maternal deaths from sudden unexpected death in epilepsy among women taking no or inadequate drug treatment for their epilepsy.7 We must also recognise the culpability of researchers’ acceptance to exclude pregnant women from clinical trials and act to ensure that inclusion in such research becomes the default.9 The guidance for ethical principles of the Pregnancy Research Ethics for Vaccines, Epidemics, and New Technologies (PREVENT) Working Group state that “Justice requires that pregnant women have fair access to research that offers the prospect of direct benefit.”9 Pregnant women are frequently excluded by default from trials because of concerns about potential harm to the unborn child, despite a paucity of theoretical evidence to underlie such concerns, alongside real potential for maternal benefit. High proportions of vaccine hesitancy and preventable deaths of unvaccinated pregnant women from covid-19 is but one example of the impact of such exclusion. During pregnancy, many women with physical and mental health comorbidities are still expected to attend multiple appointments with different teams, without thought to the near impossibility of such models of care for women with employment and childcare responsibilities. Holistic models of care are infrequent with clinicians tending to work in silos and without basic understanding of pregnancy medicine. The impacts of the woman's previous experiences of interactions with health and social care services, for example, with racial microaggressions and stereotyping, are rarely considered by healthcare providers.10 The effects of complications experienced during pregnancy can be life long, but many can be prevented by actions and care during the first postnatal year. Pregnancy events are a known cause of post-traumatic stress disorder for both women and their partners, and early intervention can prevent long term distress. Early postnatal blood pressure control can have long term benefits on future hypertension and cardiovascular events. Undiagnosed postnatal depression is recognised to have affected some women for several years, with associated impacts on their children and families. Postnatal care, however, is rarely prioritised. These examples clearly show that pregnancy problems and their long term consequences can be prevented only by consideration of the needs of pregnant women throughout their life. The question arises as to why the consideration of these needs is not yet the case. Whatever our clinical specialty (be it paediatric, adult, or even geriatric medicine, when cardiovascular, urological, and mental health complications as a result of pregnancy conditions are still be evident), there will be examples of how the care we provide can prevent future pregnancy problems, or adverse consequences of pregnancy problems. As researchers, clinicians, service managers, and policy makers, we need to recognise this opportunity and ensure that women’s voices are heard, and their needs recognised. We are all part of the solution—as individuals we need to take the first step and recognise this. Pregnancy must be an important focus for us all.

                Author and article information

                Journal
                BMJ
                BMJ
                BMJ
                1756-1833
                April 06 2022
                : o898
                Article
                10.1136/bmj.o898
                35387766
                b5986583-dae2-4934-89bf-2b0d54a90855
                © 2022

                http://www.bmj.com/company/legal-information/terms-conditions/legal-information/tdm-licencepolicy

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                Related Documents Log