7
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      The efficacy and safety of cangrelor in single vessel vs multivessel percutaneous coronary intervention: Insights from CHAMPION PHOENIX

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          The intravenous, rapidly acting P2Y12 inhibitor cangrelor reduces the rate of ischemic events during PCI with no significant increase in severe bleeding. However, the efficacy and safety of cangrelor compared with clopidogrel in patients treated with single vessel (SV)‐percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or multivessel (MV)‐PCI remains unexplored.

          Methods

          We studied the modified intention‐to‐treat population of patients from the CHAMPION PHOENIX trial who were randomized to either cangrelor or clopidogrel. We used logistic regression and propensity score matching to evaluate the effect of cangrelor compared with clopidogrel on the primary efficacy outcome (composite of death, myocardial infarction, ischemia‐driven revascularization, or stent thrombosis) at 48 hours. The safety outcome was moderate or severe Global Utilization of Streptokinase and tPA for Occluded Arteries bleeding at 48 hours.

          Hypothesis

          Cangrelor is as efficacious and safe as clopidogrel in both SV and MV PCI.

          Results

          Among 10 854 patients, 9204 (85%) underwent SV‐ and 1650 (15%) MV‐PCI. After adjustment, cangrelor was associated with similar reductions vs clopidogrel in the primary efficacy outcome in patients undergoing SV‐PCI (4.5% vs 5.2%; odds ratio [OR] 0.81 [0.66‐0.98]) or MV‐PCI (6.1% vs 9.8%, OR 0.59 [0.41‐0.85]; Pint 0.14). Similar results were observed after propensity score matching (SV‐PCI: 5.5% vs 5.9%, OR 0.93 [0.74‐1.18]; MV‐PCI: 6.2% vs 8.9%, OR 0.67 [0.44‐1.01]; Pint 0.17). There was no evidence of heterogeneity in the treatment effect of cangrelor compared with clopidogrel for the safety outcome.

          Conclusions

          In patients undergoing SV‐ or MV‐PCI, cangrelor was associated with similar relative risk reductions in ischemic complications and no increased risk of significant bleeding compared with clopidogrel, which highlights the expanding repertoire of options for use in complex PCI.

          Related collections

          Most cited references14

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          An updated bleeding model to predict the risk of post-procedure bleeding among patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: a report using an expanded bleeding definition from the National Cardiovascular Data Registry CathPCI Registry.

          This study sought to develop a model that predicts bleeding complications using an expanded bleeding definition among patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in contemporary clinical practice.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Population trends in percutaneous coronary intervention: 20-year results from the SCAAR (Swedish Coronary Angiography and Angioplasty Registry).

            The aim of this study was to describe the characteristics and outcome of all consecutive patients treated with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in an unselected nationwide cohort over the past 2 decades. Over the last 20 years, treatment with PCI has evolved dramatically, but the change in patient characteristics has not been well described. We included all patients undergoing a PCI procedure for the first time between January 1990 and December 2010 from the SCAAR (Swedish Coronary Angiography and Angioplasty Registry). Patients were divided into different cohorts on the basis of the year of the first PCI procedure. A total of 144,039 patients was included. The mean age increased from 60.1 ± 9.9 years in 1990 to 1995 to 67.1 ± 11.2 years in 2009 to 2010. The proportion of patients presenting with unstable coronary artery disease and ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction increased from 27.4% and 6.2% to 47.7% and 32.5%, respectively. Diabetes mellitus and multivessel disease were more often present in the later-year cohorts. The 1-year mortality increased from 2.2% in 1990 to 1995 to 5.9% in 2009 to 2010, but after adjustment for age and indication, a modest decrease was shown, mainly in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients. Characteristics of PCI patients have changed substantially over time, reflecting the establishment of new evidence. The increasing age and proportion of patients undergoing PCI for acute coronary syndromes greatly influence outcome. Understanding the changing patient characteristics is important for the translation of evidence to real-world clinical practice.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Incomplete revascularization in the era of drug-eluting stents: impact on adverse outcomes.

              We sought to compare outcomes for percutaneous coronary intervention patients undergoing complete revascularization (CR) and incomplete revascularization (IR) in the drug-eluting stent era. There have been relatively few studies that have examined the impact of IR in patients undergoing coronary stenting, particularly in the era of drug-eluting stents. New York State's Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Reporting System was used to identify 11,294 stent patients with multivessel disease undergoing either IR or CR in 39 hospitals between October 1, 2003, and December 31, 2004. These patients were followed through December 31, 2005, and IR patients were subdivided based on the number of IR vessels and presence of a chronic total occlusion. Risk-adjusted mortality and mortality/myocardial infarction (MI) for CR and IR patients were compared at 18 months. Incomplete revascularization was performed in a total of 7,795 patients (69.0%). Incomplete revascularization was associated with higher 18-month mortality (adjusted hazard ratio [HR]: 1.23, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.04 to 1.45) and higher 18-month MI/mortality (adjusted HR: 1.27, 95% CI: 1.09 to 1.47). The risk-adjusted survival rates for CR and IR were 94.9% and 93.8% (p = 0.01). The risk-adjusted survival/freedom from MI rates were 93.3% and 91.7% (p = 0.002). Patients with 2 diseased vessels unattempted with a total occlusion were at highest risk (adjusted survival HR: 1.44, 95% CI: 1.14 to 1.82, risk-adjusted survival 94.9% vs. 92.9%, p = 0.002; and adjusted survival/freedom from MI: 1.50, 95% CI: 1.21 to 1.86, rates 93.3% vs. 90.3%, p < 0.001). Patients undergoing coronary stenting who receive IR experience more adverse outcomes even in the era of drug-eluting stents. This has implications for choice of procedure and post-procedural monitoring.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                cyong@stanford.edu
                Journal
                Clin Cardiol
                Clin Cardiol
                10.1002/(ISSN)1932-8737
                CLC
                Clinical Cardiology
                Wiley Periodicals, Inc. (New York )
                0160-9289
                1932-8737
                29 June 2019
                September 2019
                : 42
                : 9 ( doiID: 10.1002/clc.v42.9 )
                : 797-805
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ] Division of Cardiology, Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Healthcare System Palo Alto California
                [ 2 ] Division of Cardiovascular Medicine Stanford University School of Medicine Stanford California
                [ 3 ] Quantitative Sciences Unit, Department of Medicine Stanford University School of Medicine Stanford California
                [ 4 ] Stanford Center for Clinical Research (SCCR) Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine Stanford California
                [ 5 ] Department of Cardiology and Angiology I Heart Center Freiburg University, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg Freiburg Germany
                [ 6 ] Cardiovascular Research Foundation Columbia University Medical Center New York New York
                [ 7 ] DHU (Département Hospitalo‐Universitaire)‐FIRE (Fibrosis, Inflammation, REmodelling), Hôpital Bichat, AP‐HPb (Assistance Publique‐Hôpitaux de Paris) Université Paris‐Diderot, Sorbonne‐Paris Cité, and FACT (French Alliance for Cardiovascular clinical Trials), an F‐CRIN network, INSERM U‐1148 Paris France
                [ 8 ] NLHI, ICMS Royal Brompton Hospital, Imperial College London UK
                [ 9 ] Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Division of Cardiology Harvard Medical School, Boston Boston Massachusetts
                [ 10 ] Kerckhoff Heart and Thorax Center Bad Nauheim Germany
                [ 11 ] Scripps Clinic and Scripps Translational Science Institute La Jolla California
                [ 12 ] Science and Strategy Consulting Group Basking Ridge New Jersey
                [ 13 ] Elysis Carlisle Massachusetts
                [ 14 ] Auckland City Hospital University of Auckland Auckland New Zealand
                [ 15 ] Brigham and Women's Hospital Heart & Vascular Center Harvard Medical School Boston Massachusetts
                Author notes
                [*] [* ] Correspondence

                Celina M. Yong, MD, MBA, MSc, Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology Palo Alto Veterans Affairs Hospital, 3801 Miranda Avenue, 111C Palo Alto, CA 94304.

                Email: cyong@ 123456stanford.edu

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3054-6576
                Article
                CLC23221
                10.1002/clc.23221
                6727881
                31254472
                b5a2dc28-e6b2-4813-b2e2-c65a31bd7e5d
                © 2019 The Authors. Clinical Cardiology published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

                This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 03 May 2019
                : 18 June 2019
                Page count
                Figures: 3, Tables: 2, Pages: 9, Words: 5295
                Categories
                Clinical Investigations
                Clinical Investigations
                Custom metadata
                2.0
                clc23221
                September 2019
                Converter:WILEY_ML3GV2_TO_NLMPMC version:5.6.8 mode:remove_FC converted:05.09.2019

                Cardiovascular Medicine
                cangrelor,clopidogrel,multivessel percutaneous coronary intervention

                Comments

                Comment on this article