56
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Training response inhibition to food is associated with weight loss and reduced energy intake

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The majority of adults in the UK and US are overweight or obese due to multiple factors including excess energy intake. Training people to inhibit simple motor responses (key presses) to high-energy density food pictures reduces intake in laboratory studies. We examined whether online response inhibition training reduced real-world food consumption and weight in a community sample of adults who were predominantly overweight or obese (N = 83). Participants were allocated in a randomised, double-blind design to receive four 10-min sessions of either active or control go/no-go training in which either high-energy density snack foods (active) or non-food stimuli (control) were associated with no-go signals. Participants' weight, energy intake (calculated from 24-h food diaries), daily snacking frequency and subjective food evaluations were measured for one week pre- and post-intervention. Participants also provided self-reported weight and monthly snacking frequency at pre-intervention screening, and one month and six months after completing the study. Participants in the active relative to control condition showed significant weight loss, reductions in daily energy intake and a reduction in rated liking of high-energy density (no-go) foods from the pre-to post-intervention week. There were no changes in self-reported daily snacking frequency. At longer-term follow-up, the active group showed significant reductions in self-reported weight at six months, whilst both groups reported significantly less snacking at one- and six-months. Excellent rates of adherence (97%) and positive feedback about the training suggest that this intervention is acceptable and has the potential to improve public health by reducing energy intake and overweight.

          Graphical abstract

          Highlights

          • We examine whether response inhibition training alters real-world eating behaviour.

          • Food no-go training (active) reduces energy intake, weight and food liking.

          • Non-food no-go training (control) has no effect pre-to post-intervention.

          • Both groups show reduced snacking at one and six-month follow-ups.

          • Active training is associated with self-reported weight loss at six-months.

          Related collections

          Most cited references46

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Toward an instance theory of automatization.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            The three-factor eating questionnaire to measure dietary restraint, disinhibition and hunger.

            This report describes the construction of a questionnaire to measure three dimensions of human eating behavior. The first step was a collation of items from two existing questionnaires that measure the related concepts of 'restrained eating' and 'latent obesity', to which were added items newly written to elucidate these concepts. This version was administered to several populations selected to include persons who exhibited the spectrum from extreme dietary restraint to extreme lack of restraint. The resulting responses were factor analyzed and the resulting factor structure was used to revise the questionnaire. This process was then repeated: administration of the revised questionnaire to groups representing extremes of dietary restraint, factor analysis of the results and questionnaire revision. Three stable factors emerged: (1) 'cognitive restraint of eating', (2) 'disinhibition' and (3) 'hunger'. The new 51-item questionnaire measuring these factors is presented.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              A hot/cool-system analysis of delay of gratification: dynamics of willpower.

              A 2-system framework is proposed for understanding the processes that enable--and undermine--self-control or "willpower" as exemplified in the delay of gratification paradigm. A cool, cognitive "know" system and a hot, emotional "go" system are postulated. The cool system is cognitive, emotionally neutral, contemplative, flexible, integrated, coherent, spatiotemporal, slow, episodic, and strategic. It is the seat of self-regulation and self-control. The hot system is the basis of emotionality, fears as well as passions--impulsive and reflexive--initially controlled by innate releasing stimuli (and, thus, literally under "stimulus control"): it is fundamental for emotional (classical) conditioning and undermines efforts at self-control. The balance between the hot and cool systems is determined by stress, developmental level, and the individual's self-regulatory dynamics. The interactions between these systems allow explanation of findings on willpower from 3 decades of research.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Appetite
                Appetite
                Appetite
                Academic Press
                0195-6663
                1095-8304
                01 December 2015
                01 December 2015
                : 95
                : 17-28
                Affiliations
                [a ]School of Psychology, College of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, EX4 4QG, UK
                [b ]School of Psychology, Cardiff University, Park Place, Cardiff, CF10 3AT, UK
                [c ]University of Exeter Medical School, Barrack Road, Exeter, EX2 5DW, UK
                Author notes
                []Corresponding author. Natalia.Lawrence@ 123456exeter.ac.uk
                Article
                S0195-6663(15)00296-2
                10.1016/j.appet.2015.06.009
                4596151
                26122756
                b5ba0ce4-873b-413f-828c-25c4ea9f6306
                © 2015 The Authors

                This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

                History
                : 27 February 2015
                : 12 June 2015
                : 15 June 2015
                Categories
                Research Report

                response inhibition,cognitive training,weight loss,energy intake,food liking,disinhibition

                Comments

                Comment on this article