5
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Sustained employment, work disability and work functioning in CKD patients: a cross-sectional survey study

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Introduction

          Kidney failure negatively affects opportunities for work participation. Little is known about work functioning of employed CKD patients. This study investigates work-related outcomes, and examines associations between patient characteristics and employment status.

          Methods

          We performed a cross-sectional survey study in nine nephrology outpatient clinics in the Netherlands among working age (18–67 years) CKD Stage G3b-G5, dialysis and transplant patients ( n = 634; mean age 53.4 years (SD 10); 53% male; 47% Stage G3b-G5, 9% dialysis, 44% transplantation). We assessed employment status, work disability, work-related characteristics (i.e., work situation, working hours, job demands), work functioning (i.e., perceived ability to work, productivity loss, limitations in work), work environment (i.e., work accommodations, psychosocial work environment), as well as health status and fatigue.

          Results

          Sixty-five percent were employed reporting moderate work ability. Of those, 21% received supplementary work disability benefits, 37% were severely fatigued, 7% expected to drop out of the workforce, and 49% experienced CKD-related work limitations. Work accommodations included reduced working hours, working at a slower pace, adjustment of work tasks or work schedule, and working from home. Multivariable analysis of sustained employment showed associations with younger age, male gender, higher level of education, better general and physical health and pre-emptive transplantation. Transplant patients had the highest work ability and highest expectation to maintain work. Dialysis patients had the highest productivity loss and perceived the most limitations regarding functioning in work. Stage G3b-G5 patients reported the lowest social support from colleagues and highest conflict in work and private life.

          Conclusions

          Employed CKD patients experience difficulties regarding functioning in work requiring adjustment of work or partial work disability. In addition to dialysis patients, stage G3b-G5 patients are vulnerable concerning sustained employment and work functioning.

          Supplementary Information

          The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40620-022-01476-w.

          Related collections

          Most cited references28

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Development of the kidney disease quality of life (KDQOL) instrument.

          This paper describes the Kidney Disease Quality of Life (KDQOL) Instrument (dialysis version), a self-report measure that includes a 36-item health survey as the generic core, supplemented with multi-item scales targeted at particular concerns of individuals with kidney disease and on dialysis (symptom/problems, effects of kidney disease on daily life, burden of kidney disease, cognitive function, work status, sexual function, quality of social interaction, sleep). Also included were multi-item measures of social support, dialysis staff encouragement and patient satisfaction, and a single-item overall rating of health. The KDQOL was administered to 165 individuals with kidney disease (52% female; 48% male; 47% White; 27% African-American; 11% Hispanic; 8% Asian; 4% Native American; and 3% other ethnicities), sampled from nine different outpatient dialysis centres located in Southern California, the Northwest, and the Midwest. The average age of the sample was 53 years (range from 22 to 87), and 10% were 75 years or older. Internal consistency reliability estimates for the 19 multi-item scales exceeded 0.75 for every measure except one. The mean scores for individuals in this sample on the 36-item health scales were lower than the general population by one-quarter (emotional well-being) to a full standard deviation (physical function, role limitations due to physical health, general health), but similar to scores for dialysis patients in other studies. Correlations of the KDQOL scales with number of hospital days in the last 6 months were statistically significant (p < 0.05) for 14 of the 19 scales and number of medications currently being taken for nine of the scales. Results of this study provide support for the reliability and validity of the KDQOL.
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Going to work ill: A meta-analysis of the correlates of presenteeism and a dual-path model.

            Interest in presenteeism, attending work while ill, has flourished in light of its consequences for individual well-being and organizational productivity. Our goal was to identify its most significant causes and correlates by quantitatively summarizing the extant research. Additionally, we built an empirical model of some key correlates and compared the etiology of presenteeism versus absenteeism. We used meta-analysis (in total, K = 109 samples, N = 175,965) to investigate the correlates of presenteeism and meta-analytic structural equation modeling to test the empirical model. Salient correlates of working while ill included general ill health, constraints on absenteeism (e.g., strict absence policies, job insecurity), elevated job demands and felt stress, lack of job and personal resources (e.g., low support and low optimism), negative relational experiences (e.g., perceived discrimination), and positive attitudes (satisfaction, engagement, and commitment). Moreover, our dual process model clarified how job demands and job and personal resources elicit presenteeism via both health impairment and motivational paths, and they explained more variation in presenteeism than absenteeism. The study sheds light on the controversial act of presenteeism, uncovering both positive and negative underlying mechanisms. The greater variance explained in presenteeism as opposed to absenteeism underlines the opportunities for researchers to meaningfully investigate the behavior and for organizations to manage it. (PsycINFO Database Record
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              The assessment of fatigue: Psychometric qualities and norms for the Checklist individual strength.

              The Checklist Individual Strength (CIS) measures four dimensions of fatigue: Fatigue severity, concentration problems, reduced motivation and activity. On the fatigue severity subscale, a cut-off score of 35 is used. This study 1) investigated the psychometric qualities of the CIS; 2) validated the cut-off score for severe fatigue and 3) provided norms.

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                m.a.alma@umcg.nl
                Journal
                J Nephrol
                J Nephrol
                Journal of Nephrology
                Springer International Publishing (Cham )
                1121-8428
                1724-6059
                31 October 2022
                31 October 2022
                2023
                : 36
                : 3
                : 731-743
                Affiliations
                [1 ]GRID grid.4494.d, ISNI 0000 0000 9558 4598, Department of Health Sciences, , Applied Health Research, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, ; Groningen, The Netherlands
                [2 ]GRID grid.4830.f, ISNI 0000 0004 0407 1981, Department of Health Sciences, Community and Occupational Medicine, , University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, ; Groningen, The Netherlands
                [3 ]GRID grid.10417.33, ISNI 0000 0004 0444 9382, Department of Nephrology, , Radboud University Medical Center, ; Nijmegen, The Netherlands
                [4 ]GRID grid.10419.3d, ISNI 0000000089452978, Department of Nephrology, , Leiden University Medical Center, ; Leiden, The Netherlands
                [5 ]GRID grid.491130.e, Dialysis Center Groningen, ; Groningen, The Netherlands
                [6 ]GRID grid.452600.5, ISNI 0000 0001 0547 5927, Department of Internal Medicine, , Isala Hospital, ; Zwolle, The Netherlands
                [7 ]GRID grid.413532.2, ISNI 0000 0004 0398 8384, Department of Internal Medicine, , Catharina Hospital, ; Eindhoven, The Netherlands
                [8 ]GRID grid.4830.f, ISNI 0000 0004 0407 1981, Department of Nephrology, , University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, ; Groningen, The Netherlands
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8203-2713
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0100-4882
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3819-4360
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4935-9765
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8178-1413
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4417-7732
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3223-0906
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2684-096X
                Article
                1476
                10.1007/s40620-022-01476-w
                10090013
                36315355
                b6154aa2-6c9d-4b2a-a272-f0c501a67f94
                © The Author(s) 2022

                Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

                History
                : 11 April 2022
                : 1 October 2022
                Funding
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100002997, Nierstichting;
                Award ID: SWO14.01
                Award Recipient :
                Categories
                original Article
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) under exclusive licence to Italian Society of Nephrology 2023

                sustained employment,work functioning,chronic kidney disease,survey study

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                Related Documents Log