4
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      An Improved Cutting Plane Method for Convex Optimization, Convex-Concave Games and its Applications

      Preprint
      , , ,

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Given a separation oracle for a convex set \(K \subset \mathbb{R}^n\) that is contained in a box of radius \(R\), the goal is to either compute a point in \(K\) or prove that \(K\) does not contain a ball of radius \(\epsilon\). We propose a new cutting plane algorithm that uses an optimal \(O(n \log (\kappa))\) evaluations of the oracle and an additional \(O(n^2)\) time per evaluation, where \(\kappa = nR/\epsilon\). \(\bullet\) This improves upon Vaidya's \(O( \text{SO} \cdot n \log (\kappa) + n^{\omega+1} \log (\kappa))\) time algorithm [Vaidya, FOCS 1989a] in terms of polynomial dependence on \(n\), where \(\omega < 2.373\) is the exponent of matrix multiplication and \(\text{SO}\) is the time for oracle evaluation. \(\bullet\) This improves upon Lee-Sidford-Wong's \(O( \text{SO} \cdot n \log (\kappa) + n^3 \log^{O(1)} (\kappa))\) time algorithm [Lee, Sidford and Wong, FOCS 2015] in terms of dependence on \(\kappa\). For many important applications in economics, \(\kappa = \Omega(\exp(n))\) and this leads to a significant difference between \(\log(\kappa)\) and \(\mathrm{poly}(\log (\kappa))\). We also provide evidence that the \(n^2\) time per evaluation cannot be improved and thus our running time is optimal. A bottleneck of previous cutting plane methods is to compute leverage scores, a measure of the relative importance of past constraints. Our result is achieved by a novel multi-layered data structure for leverage score maintenance, which is a sophisticated combination of diverse techniques such as random projection, batched low-rank update, inverse maintenance, polynomial interpolation, and fast rectangular matrix multiplication. Interestingly, our method requires a combination of different fast rectangular matrix multiplication algorithms.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          08 April 2020
          Article
          2004.04250
          b63bc960-f1db-4144-b5dd-55e43a76075e

          http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/

          History
          Custom metadata
          STOC 2020
          cs.DS cs.LG stat.ML

          Data structures & Algorithms,Machine learning,Artificial intelligence
          Data structures & Algorithms, Machine learning, Artificial intelligence

          Comments

          Comment on this article