8
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Robotic-Arm–Assisted vs Conventional Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty. The 2-Year Clinical Outcomes of a Randomized Controlled Trial

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) for treatment of medial compartment osteoarthritis has potential benefits over total knee arthroplasty but UKA has a higher revision rate. Robotic-assisted UKA is increasingly common and offers more accurate implant positioning and limb alignment, lower early postoperative pain but evidence of functional outcome is lacking. The aim was to assess the clinical outcomes of a single-centre, prospective, randomised controlled trial, comparing robotic-arm-assisted UKA with conventional surgery.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          The Journal of Arthroplasty
          The Journal of Arthroplasty
          Elsevier BV
          08835403
          July 2018
          July 2018
          : 33
          : 7
          : S109-S115
          Article
          10.1016/j.arth.2018.02.050
          29627257
          b65292e4-e042-4cce-84e5-7dd830f6ff1f
          © 2018

          https://www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/

          History

          Comments

          Comment on this article