10
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Gender differences in fatigability and muscle activity responses to a short-cycle repetitive task

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Purpose

          Epidemiological research has identified women to be more susceptible to developing neck–shoulder musculoskeletal disorders when performing low-force, repetitive work tasks. Whether this is attributable to gender differences in fatigability and motor control is currently unclear. This study investigated the extent to which women differ from men in fatigability and motor control while performing a short-cycle repetitive task.

          Methods

          113 healthy young adults (58 women, 55 men) performed a standardized repetitive pointing task. The task was terminated when the subject’s perceived exertion reached 8 on the Borg scale. The time to task termination, and changes in means and cycle-to-cycle variabilities of surface electromyography signals from start to end of the task, were compared between women and men, for the upper trapezius, anterior deltoid, biceps and triceps muscles.

          Results

          Women and men terminated the task after 6.5 (SD 3.75) and 7 (SD 4) min on average ( p > 0.05). All four muscles showed an increase of 25–35 % in average muscle activity with fatigue (no significant sex differences). However, men exhibited a higher increase than women in trapezius muscle variability with fatigue (31 vs. 7 %; p < 0.05), and a decrease in biceps muscle variability where women had an increase (−23 vs. 12 %; p < 0.05).

          Conclusions

          Our results suggest that women and men may not differ in the ability to perform repetitive tasks at low-to-moderate force levels. However, differences in motor control strategies employed in task performance may explain gender differences in susceptibility to developing musculoskeletal disorders when performing repetitive work for prolonged periods in occupational life.

          Related collections

          Most cited references23

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Risk factors for work-related musculoskeletal disorders: A systematic review of recent longitudinal studies.

          This systematic review was designed and conducted in an effort to evaluate the evidence currently available for the many suggested risk factors for work-related musculoskeletal disorders. To identify pertinent literature we searched four electronic databases (Cinahl, Embase, Medline, and The Cochrane Library). The search strategies combined terms for musculoskeletal disorders, work, and risk factors. Only case-control or cohort studies were included. A total of 1,761 non-duplicated articles were identified and screened, and 63 studies were reviewed and integrated in this article. The risk factors identified for the development of work-related musculoskeletal disorders were divided and organized according to the affected body part, type of risk factor (biomechanical, psychosocial, or individual) and level of evidence (strong, reasonable, or insufficient evidence). Risk factors with at least reasonable evidence of a causal relationship for the development of work-related musculoskeletal disorders include: heavy physical work, smoking, high body mass index, high psychosocial work demands, and the presence of co-morbidities. The most commonly reported biomechanical risk factors with at least reasonable evidence for causing WMSD include excessive repetition, awkward postures, and heavy lifting. Additional high methodological quality studies are needed to further understand and provide stronger evidence of the causal relationship between risk factors and work-related musculoskeletal disorders. The information provided in this article may be useful to healthcare providers, researchers, and ergonomists interested on risk identification and design of interventions to reduce the rates of work-related musculoskeletal disorders. 2009 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Sex differences in human fatigability: mechanisms and insight to physiological responses.

            S K Hunter (2014)
            Sex-related differences in physiology and anatomy are responsible for profound differences in neuromuscular performance and fatigability between men and women. Women are usually less fatigable than men for similar intensity isometric fatiguing contractions. This sex difference in fatigability, however, is task specific because different neuromuscular sites will be stressed when the requirements of the task are altered, and the stress on these sites can differ for men and women. Task variables that can alter the sex difference in fatigability include the type, intensity and speed of contraction, the muscle group assessed and the environmental conditions. Physiological mechanisms that are responsible for sex-based differences in fatigability may include activation of the motor neurone pool from cortical and subcortical regions, synaptic inputs to the motor neurone pool via activation of metabolically sensitive small afferent fibres in the muscle, muscle perfusion and skeletal muscle metabolism and fibre type properties. Non-physiological factors such as the sex bias of studying more males than females in human and animal experiments can also mask a true understanding of the magnitude and mechanisms of sex-based differences in physiology and fatigability. Despite recent developments, there is a tremendous lack of understanding of sex differences in neuromuscular function and fatigability, the prevailing mechanisms and the functional consequences. This review emphasizes the need to understand sex-based differences in fatigability to shed light on the benefits and limitations that fatigability can exert for men and women during daily tasks, exercise performance, training and rehabilitation in both health and disease. © 2014 Scandinavian Physiological Society. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Human variation in skeletal muscle fiber-type proportion and enzyme activities.

              The purpose of the present study was to describe the extent of the variation in some of the common characteristics of human skeletal muscle. A total of 418 biopsies was obtained from the vastus lateralis muscle of 270 healthy sedentary and 148 physically active individuals of both sexes. The lowest and highest proportion of type I muscle fiber observed were 15 and 85%, respectively. Coefficients of variation (CV) reached approximately 30% for the proportion of types I and IIA fibers and were two times higher for the proportion of type IIB fiber. The smallest and largest mean muscle fiber cross-sectional areas (CSA) were approximately 1,100 microns 2 and 9,500 microns 2, respectively. Mean CSA of the various fiber types exhibited CV of approximately 23%. CV reached 30% for the activity of creatine kinase, ranged between 28 and 41% for the glycolytic enzyme markers, and between 34 and 44% for the aerobic-oxidative enzyme markers. The mean proportion of type I fiber was lower in male than in female muscles, whereas the mean CSA of all fiber types was smaller in female than in male muscles. Levels of glycolytic enzyme markers were higher in male than in female skeletal muscles. However, activities of aerobic-oxidative enzyme markers were similar in males and females. These results reveal the existence of large interindividual variability and gender differences in the most common characteristics of the human skeletal muscle.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                (+1) 540-231-0083 , sdivya1@vt.edu
                kathryn.sinden@mail.mcgill.ca
                smn@hig.se
                julie.cote2@mcgill.ca
                Journal
                Eur J Appl Physiol
                Eur. J. Appl. Physiol
                European Journal of Applied Physiology
                Springer Berlin Heidelberg (Berlin/Heidelberg )
                1439-6319
                1439-6327
                14 October 2016
                14 October 2016
                2016
                : 116
                : 11
                : 2357-2365
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Occupational and Public Health Sciences, Centre for Musculoskeletal Research, University of Gavle, 801 76 Gavle, Sweden
                [2 ]McGill University, 475 Pine Avenue West, Montreal, QC H2W 1S4 Canada
                [3 ]CRIR Research Centre, Jewish Rehabilitation Hospital, 3205 Alton Goldbloom Place, Laval, QC H7V-1R2 Canada
                [4 ]Grado Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA 24060 USA
                Author notes

                Communicated by Toshio Moritani.

                Article
                3487
                10.1007/s00421-016-3487-7
                5118407
                27743025
                b661a528-633b-4763-8d3d-843ccba5d301
                © The Author(s) 2016

                Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

                History
                : 11 June 2016
                : 7 October 2016
                Funding
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100001861, Forskningsrådet för Arbetsliv och Socialvetenskap;
                Award ID: 2009-1761
                Award ID: 2011-0075
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000024, Canadian Institutes of Health Research;
                Categories
                Original Article
                Custom metadata
                © Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2016

                Anatomy & Physiology
                pointing movement,motor variability,multi-jointed movements,shoulder–elbow coordination,motor control,cycle-to-cycle variability

                Comments

                Comment on this article