14
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Cognitive Modeling of Individual Variation in Reference Production and Comprehension

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          A challenge for most theoretical and computational accounts of linguistic reference is the observation that language users vary considerably in their referential choices. Part of the variation observed among and within language users and across tasks may be explained from variation in the cognitive resources available to speakers and listeners. This paper presents a computational model of reference production and comprehension developed within the cognitive architecture ACT-R. Through simulations with this ACT-R model, it is investigated how cognitive constraints interact with linguistic constraints and features of the linguistic discourse in speakers’ production and listeners’ comprehension of referring expressions in specific tasks, and how this interaction may give rise to variation in referential choice. The ACT-R model of reference explains and predicts variation among language users in their referential choices as a result of individual and task-related differences in processing speed and working memory capacity. Because of limitations in their cognitive capacities, speakers sometimes underspecify or overspecify their referring expressions, and listeners sometimes choose incorrect referents or are overly liberal in their interpretation of referring expressions.

          Related collections

          Most cited references30

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          “John thinks that Mary thinks that…” attribution of second-order beliefs by 5- to 10-year-old children

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Predicting pragmatic reasoning in language games.

            One of the most astonishing features of human language is its capacity to convey information efficiently in context. Many theories provide informal accounts of communicative inference, yet there have been few successes in making precise, quantitative predictions about pragmatic reasoning. We examined judgments about simple referential communication games, modeling behavior in these games by assuming that speakers attempt to be informative and that listeners use Bayesian inference to recover speakers' intended referents. Our model provides a close, parameter-free fit to human judgments, suggesting that the use of information-theoretic tools to predict pragmatic reasoning may lead to more effective formal models of communication.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Working memory and second language comprehension and production: a meta-analysis.

              Although working memory (WM) figures centrally in many theories of second language (L2) proficiency development and processing, some have argued that the importance of WM is overstated (e.g., Juffs, Transactions of the Philological Society, 102, 199-225, 2004). Despite many studies over the past two decades, the literature lacks a quantitative synthesis of the extant results. In this article, we report a meta-analysis of data from 79 samples involving 3,707 participants providing 748 effect sizes. The results indicate that WM is positively associated with both L2 processing and proficiency outcomes, with an estimated population effect size (ρ) of .255. In additional analyses, we assessed whether the WM-criterion relationship was modulated by potential covariates identified in the literature search (i.e., participant characteristics, WM measure features, criterion measure factors, and publication status). The results of the covariate analyses indicated larger effect sizes for the executive control (vs. storage) component of WM, and for verbal (vs. nonverbal) measures of WM. Minimal publication bias was detected, suggesting that WM has a robust, positive relationship with L2 outcomes. We discuss the implications of these results for models of WM and theories of L2 processing and L2 proficiency development.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Front Psychol
                Front Psychol
                Front. Psychol.
                Frontiers in Psychology
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                1664-1078
                07 April 2016
                2016
                : 7
                : 506
                Affiliations
                Center for Language and Cognition Groningen (CLCG), University of Groningen Groningen, Netherlands
                Author notes

                Edited by: Kees Van Deemter, University of Aberdeen, UK

                Reviewed by: Agnieszka Konopka, Max Plank Institute for Psycholinguistics, Netherlands; Antal Van Den Bosch, Radboud University Nijmegen, Netherlands

                *Correspondence: Petra Hendriks, p.hendriks@ 123456rug.nl

                This article was submitted to Language Sciences, a section of the journal Frontiers in Psychology

                Article
                10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00506
                4823268
                27092101
                b661f412-959d-4c91-a7ea-46d670883705
                Copyright © 2016 Hendriks.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 31 July 2015
                : 24 March 2016
                Page count
                Figures: 6, Tables: 0, Equations: 0, References: 71, Pages: 17, Words: 0
                Funding
                Funded by: Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek 10.13039/501100003246
                Award ID: 277-70-005
                Categories
                Psychology
                Hypothesis and Theory

                Clinical Psychology & Psychiatry
                act-r,cognitive modeling,perspective taking,processing speed,reference comprehension,reference production,working memory

                Comments

                Comment on this article