14
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Can Principals Promote Teacher Development as Evaluators? A Case Study of Principals’ Views and Experiences

      ,
      Educational Administration Quarterly
      SAGE Publications

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          <div class="section"> <a class="named-anchor" id="S1"> <!-- named anchor --> </a> <h5 class="section-title" id="d2696313e99">Purpose</h5> <p id="P1">New teacher evaluation systems have expanded the role of principals as instructional leaders, but little is known about principals’ ability to promote teacher development through the evaluation process. We conducted a case study of principals’ perspectives on evaluation and their experiences implementing observation and feedback cycles to better understand whether principals feel as though they are able to promote teacher development as evaluators. </p> </div><div class="section"> <a class="named-anchor" id="S2"> <!-- named anchor --> </a> <h5 class="section-title" id="d2696313e104">Research Methods</h5> <p id="P2">We conducted interviews with a stratified random sample of 24 principals in an urban district that recently implemented major reforms to its teacher evaluation system. We analyzed these interviews by drafting thematic summaries, coding interview transcripts, creating data-analytic matrices, and writing analytic memos. </p> </div><div class="section"> <a class="named-anchor" id="S3"> <!-- named anchor --> </a> <h5 class="section-title" id="d2696313e109">Findings</h5> <p id="P3">We found that the evaluation reforms provided a common framework and language that helped facilitate principals’ feedback conversations with teachers. However, we also found that tasking principals with primary responsibility for conducting evaluations resulted in a variety of unintended consequences which undercut the quality of evaluation feedback they provided. We analyze five broad solutions to these challenges: strategically targeting evaluations, reducing operational responsibilities, providing principal training, hiring instructional coaches, and developing peer evaluation systems. </p> </div><div class="section"> <a class="named-anchor" id="S4"> <!-- named anchor --> </a> <h5 class="section-title" id="d2696313e114">Implications</h5> <p id="P4">The quality of feedback teachers receive through the evaluation process depends critically on the time and training evaluators have to provide individualized and actionable feedback. Districts that task principals with primary responsibility for conducting observation and feedback cycles must attend to the many implementation challenges associated with this approach in order for next-generation evaluation systems to successfully promote teacher development. </p> </div>

          Related collections

          Most cited references34

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          What Makes Professional Development Effective? Results From a National Sample of Teachers

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            The Impact of Individual Teachers on Student Achievement: Evidence from Panel Data

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              The Impact of Leadership on Student Outcomes: An Analysis of the Differential Effects of Leadership Types

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Educational Administration Quarterly
                Educational Administration Quarterly
                SAGE Publications
                0013-161X
                1552-3519
                July 07 2016
                July 07 2016
                : 52
                : 5
                : 711-753
                Article
                10.1177/0013161X16653445
                5513173
                28729742
                b663d885-20ca-4977-92f6-dcfee2fa8a46
                © 2016

                http://journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article