423
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      FDG PET/CT: EANM procedure guidelines for tumour imaging: version 2.0

      review-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The purpose of these guidelines is to assist physicians in recommending, performing, interpreting and reporting the results of FDG PET/CT for oncological imaging of adult patients. PET is a quantitative imaging technique and therefore requires a common quality control (QC)/quality assurance (QA) procedure to maintain the accuracy and precision of quantitation. Repeatability and reproducibility are two essential requirements for any quantitative measurement and/or imaging biomarker. Repeatability relates to the uncertainty in obtaining the same result in the same patient when he or she is examined more than once on the same system. However, imaging biomarkers should also have adequate reproducibility, i.e. the ability to yield the same result in the same patient when that patient is examined on different systems and at different imaging sites. Adequate repeatability and reproducibility are essential for the clinical management of patients and the use of FDG PET/CT within multicentre trials. A common standardised imaging procedure will help promote the appropriate use of FDG PET/CT imaging and increase the value of publications and, therefore, their contribution to evidence-based medicine. Moreover, consistency in numerical values between platforms and institutes that acquire the data will potentially enhance the role of semiquantitative and quantitative image interpretation. Precision and accuracy are additionally important as FDG PET/CT is used to evaluate tumour response as well as for diagnosis, prognosis and staging. Therefore both the previous and these new guidelines specifically aim to achieve standardised uptake value harmonisation in multicentre settings.

          Related collections

          Most cited references79

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          FDG PET and PET/CT: EANM procedure guidelines for tumour PET imaging: version 1.0

          The aim of this guideline is to provide a minimum standard for the acquisition and interpretation of PET and PET/CT scans with [18F]-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG). This guideline will therefore address general information about [18F]-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET/CT) and is provided to help the physician and physicist to assist to carrying out, interpret, and document quantitative FDG PET/CT examinations, but will concentrate on the optimisation of diagnostic quality and quantitative information.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Measurement of clinical and subclinical tumour response using [18F]-fluorodeoxyglucose and positron emission tomography: review and 1999 EORTC recommendations. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) PET Study Group.

            [18F]-fluorodeoxyglucose ([18F]-FDG) uptake is enhanced in most malignant tumours which in turn can be measured using positron emission tomography (PET). A number of small clinical trials have indicated that quantification of the change in tumour [18F]-FDG uptake may provide an early, sensitive, pharmacodynamic marker of the tumoricidal effect of anticancer drugs. This may allow for the introduction of subclinical response for anticancer drug evaluation in early clinical trials and improvements in patient management. For comparison of results from smaller clinical trials and larger-scale multicentre trials a consensus is desirable for: (i) common measurement criteria; and (ii) reporting of alterations in [18F]-FDG uptake with treatment. This paper summarises the current status of the technique and recommendations on the measurement of [18F]-FDG uptake for tumour response monitoring from a consensus meeting of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) PET study group held in Brussels in February 1998 and confirmed at a subsequent meeting in March 1999.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Use of positron emission tomography for response assessment of lymphoma: consensus of the Imaging Subcommittee of International Harmonization Project in Lymphoma.

              To develop guidelines for performing and interpreting positron emission tomography (PET) imaging for treatment assessment in patients with lymphoma both in clinical practice and in clinical trials. An International Harmonization Project (IHP) was convened to discuss standardization of clinical trial parameters in lymphoma. An imaging subcommittee developed consensus recommendations based on published PET literature and the collective expertise of its members in the use of PET in lymphoma. Only recommendations subsequently endorsed by all IHP subcommittees were adopted. PET after completion of therapy should be performed at least 3 weeks, and preferably at 6 to 8 weeks, after chemotherapy or chemoimmunotherapy, and 8 to 12 weeks after radiation or chemoradiotherapy. Visual assessment alone is adequate for interpreting PET findings as positive or negative when assessing response after completion of therapy. Mediastinal blood pool activity is recommended as the reference background activity to define PET positivity for a residual mass > or = 2 cm in greatest transverse diameter, regardless of its location. A smaller residual mass or a normal sized lymph node (ie, < or = 1 x 1 cm in diameter) should be considered positive if its activity is above that of the surrounding background. Specific criteria for defining PET positivity in the liver, spleen, lung, and bone marrow are also proposed. Use of attenuation-corrected PET is strongly encouraged. Use of PET for treatment monitoring during a course of therapy should only be done in a clinical trial or as part of a prospective registry.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                +31-20-4449638 , r.boellaard@vumc.nl
                Journal
                Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging
                Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging
                European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging
                Springer Berlin Heidelberg (Berlin/Heidelberg )
                1619-7070
                1619-7089
                2 December 2014
                2 December 2014
                2015
                : 42
                : 328-354
                Affiliations
                [ ]Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, VU University Medical Centre, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
                [ ]Department of Diagnostic Imaging (Radiology) and Nuclear Medicine, San Pedro Hospital and Centre for Biomedical Research of La Rioja (CIBIR), University of La Rioja, Logroño, La Rioja Spain
                [ ]Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
                [ ]Department of Nuclear Medicine, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Lyon, Lyon, France
                [ ]Department of Nuclear Medicine, Municipal Hospital Karlsruhe Inc., Karlsruhe, Germany
                [ ]Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
                [ ]Department of Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
                [ ]PET Imaging Centre, St Thomas’ Hospital, Division of Imaging Sciences and Biomedical Engineering, King’s College London, King’s Health Partners, London, UK
                [ ]Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Center, New York, NY USA
                [ ]Department of Nuclear Medicine, Antwerp University Hospital, Antwerp, Belgium
                [ ]Department of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN USA
                [ ]Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA USA
                [ ]Invivo Molecular Imaging LLC, Gray, TN USA
                [ ]Department of Radiology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA USA
                [ ]Department of Nuclear Medicine, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, Rozzano, MI Italy
                [ ]Department of Hematology, VU University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
                [ ]Department of Nuclear Medicine, Jeroen Bosch Hospital, Den Bosch, The Netherlands
                [ ]Department of Nuclear Medicine & Molecular Imaging, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
                [ ]Department of Clinical Physics, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
                [ ]Clinic and Outpatient Clinic for Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Dresden, Dresden, Germany
                [ ]Clinic for Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
                [ ]Centre for Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
                [ ]Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Rostock, Rostock, Germany
                Article
                2961
                10.1007/s00259-014-2961-x
                4315529
                25452219
                b6bfbf47-d7a2-4cf1-9666-64a0ad177d09
                © The Author(s) 2015

                Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits any use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited.

                History
                : 10 November 2014
                : 12 November 2014
                Categories
                Guidelines
                Custom metadata
                © Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015

                Radiology & Imaging
                fdg,pet/ct,imaging procedure,tumour,oncology,quantification
                Radiology & Imaging
                fdg, pet/ct, imaging procedure, tumour, oncology, quantification

                Comments

                Comment on this article