35
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      A Knowledge-Based System for Display and Prediction of O-Glycosylation Network Behaviour in Response to Enzyme Knockouts

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          O-linked glycosylation is an important post-translational modification of mucin-type protein, changes to which are important biomarkers of cancer. For this study of the enzymes of O-glycosylation, we developed a shorthand notation for representing GalNAc-linked oligosaccharides, a method for their graphical interpretation, and a pattern-matching algorithm that generates networks of enzyme-catalysed reactions. Software for generating glycans from the enzyme activities is presented, and is also available online. The degree distributions of the resulting enzyme-reaction networks were found to be Poisson in nature. Simple graph-theoretic measures were used to characterise the resulting reaction networks. From a study of in-silico single-enzyme knockouts of each of 25 enzymes known to be involved in mucin O-glycan biosynthesis, six of them, β-1,4-galactosyltransferase ( β4Gal-T4), four glycosyltransferases and one sulfotransferase, play the dominant role in determining O-glycan heterogeneity. In the absence of β4Gal-T4, all Lewis X, sialyl-Lewis X, Lewis Y and Sd a/Cad glycoforms were eliminated, in contrast to knockouts of the N-acetylglucosaminyltransferases, which did not affect the relative abundances of O-glycans expressing these epitopes. A set of 244 experimentally determined mucin-type O-glycans obtained from the literature was used to validate the method, which was able to predict up to 98% of the most common structures obtained from human and engineered CHO cell glycoforms.

          Author Summary

          Our objective being to model the enzymes of mucin-type O-linked glycosylation, we first developed a model language to represent O-glycan structures succinctly in linear string form, to which a set of pattern-matching rules was then applied to simulate the activities of a set of 25 glycosyltransferase and sulfotransferase enzymes. The modelling language (a formal language), together with the set of transformation rules representing the enzymes of the model. comprise the deductive apparatus of a formal system. The system, implemented in software, was able to predict a highly heterogeneous set of structures when all enzymes were allowed to act, including many clinically important epitopes such as sialyl-Lewis X. We studied the effects of single-enzyme knockouts on the properties of the resulting enzyme-catalysed reaction networks and determined the enzymes most likely to be responsible for heterogeneity.

          Related collections

          Most cited references53

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          GlycoWorkbench: a tool for the computer-assisted annotation of mass spectra of glycans.

          Mass spectrometry is the main analytical technique currently used to address the challenges of glycomics as it offers unrivalled levels of sensitivity and the ability to handle complex mixtures of different glycan variations. Determination of glycan structures from analysis of MS data is a major bottleneck in high-throughput glycomics projects, and robust solutions to this problem are of critical importance. However, all the approaches currently available have inherent restrictions to the type of glycans they can identify, and none of them have proved to be a definitive tool for glycomics. GlycoWorkbench is a software tool developed by the EUROCarbDB initiative to assist the manual interpretation of MS data. The main task of GlycoWorkbench is to evaluate a set of structures proposed by the user by matching the corresponding theoretical list of fragment masses against the list of peaks derived from the spectrum. The tool provides an easy to use graphical interface, a comprehensive and increasing set of structural constituents, an exhaustive collection of fragmentation types, and a broad list of annotation options. The aim of GlycoWorkbench is to offer complete support for the routine interpretation of MS data. The software is available for download from: http://www.eurocarbdb.org/applications/ms-tools.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            On the frequency of protein glycosylation, as deduced from analysis of the SWISS-PROT database.

            The SWISS-PROT protein sequence data bank contains at present nearly 75,000 entries, almost two thirds of which include the potential N-glycosylation consensus sequence, or sequon, NXS/T (where X can be any amino acid but proline) and thus may be glycoproteins. The number of proteins filed as glycoproteins is however considerably smaller, 7942, of which 749 have been characterized with respect to the total number of their carbohydrate units and sites of attachment of the latter to the protein, as well as the nature of the carbohydrate-peptide linking group. Of these well characterized glycoproteins, about 90% carry either N-linked carbohydrate units alone or both N- and O-linked ones, attached at 1297 N-glycosylation sites (1.9 per glycoprotein molecule) and the rest are O-glycosylated only. Since the total number of sequons in the well characterized glycoproteins is 1968, their rate of occupancy is 2/3. Assuming that the same number of N-linked units and rate of sequon occupancy occur in all sequon containing proteins and that the proportion of solely O-glycosylated proteins (ca. 10%) will also be the same as among the well characterized ones, we conclude that the majority of sequon containing proteins will be found to be glycosylated and that more than half of all proteins are glycoproteins.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Self-similarity of complex networks

              Complex networks have been studied extensively due to their relevance to many real systems as diverse as the World-Wide-Web (WWW), the Internet, energy landscapes, biological and social networks \cite{ab-review,mendes,vespignani,newman,amaral}. A large number of real networks are called ``scale-free'' because they show a power-law distribution of the number of links per node \cite{ab-review,barabasi1999,faloutsos}. However, it is widely believed that complex networks are not {\it length-scale} invariant or self-similar. This conclusion originates from the ``small-world'' property of these networks, which implies that the number of nodes increases exponentially with the ``diameter'' of the network \cite{erdos,bollobas,milgram,watts}, rather than the power-law relation expected for a self-similar structure. Nevertheless, here we present a novel approach to the analysis of such networks, revealing that their structure is indeed self-similar. This result is achieved by the application of a renormalization procedure which coarse-grains the system into boxes containing nodes within a given "size". Concurrently, we identify a power-law relation between the number of boxes needed to cover the network and the size of the box defining a finite self-similar exponent. These fundamental properties, which are shown for the WWW, social, cellular and protein-protein interaction networks, help to understand the emergence of the scale-free property in complex networks. They suggest a common self-organization dynamics of diverse networks at different scales into a critical state and in turn bring together previously unrelated fields: the statistical physics of complex networks with renormalization group, fractals and critical phenomena.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: Editor
                Journal
                PLoS Comput Biol
                PLoS Comput. Biol
                plos
                ploscomp
                PLoS Computational Biology
                Public Library of Science (San Francisco, CA USA )
                1553-734X
                1553-7358
                April 2016
                7 April 2016
                : 12
                : 4
                : e1004844
                Affiliations
                [001]School of Biochemistry and Immunology, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
                University of California San Diego, UNITED STATES
                Author notes

                The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

                Conceived and designed the experiments: AGM GPD. Performed the experiments: AGM. Analyzed the data: AGM KFT GPD. Wrote the paper: AGM.

                Article
                PCOMPBIOL-D-15-01884
                10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004844
                4824424
                27054587
                b6e823a4-7316-4650-aa5b-6cea50776500
                © 2016 McDonald et al

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

                History
                : 7 November 2015
                : 2 March 2016
                Page count
                Figures: 6, Tables: 4, Pages: 24
                Funding
                This work was part supported by an EU Initial Training Network, Project No. 608381 - Training in Neurodegeneration, Therapeutics Intervention and Neurorepair (TINTIN) awarded to GPD. URL: http://ec.europa.eu/research/fp7/index_en.cfm; and Science Foundation Ireland Grant No. SFI-13/SP SSPC/I2893 URL: http://www.sfi.ie. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
                Categories
                Research Article
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Biochemistry
                Enzymology
                Enzyme Structure
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Biochemistry
                Enzymology
                Enzymes
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Biochemistry
                Proteins
                Enzymes
                Physical Sciences
                Chemistry
                Chemical Compounds
                Organic Compounds
                Carbohydrates
                Monosaccharides
                Physical Sciences
                Chemistry
                Organic Chemistry
                Organic Compounds
                Carbohydrates
                Monosaccharides
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Biochemistry
                Glycobiology
                Glycosylation
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Biochemistry
                Proteins
                Post-Translational Modification
                Glycosylation
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Neuroscience
                Cognitive Science
                Cognitive Psychology
                Language
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Psychology
                Cognitive Psychology
                Language
                Social Sciences
                Psychology
                Cognitive Psychology
                Language
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Biochemistry
                Proteins
                Mucin
                Social Sciences
                Linguistics
                Grammar
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Biochemistry
                Glycobiology
                Glycoproteins
                Custom metadata
                All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.

                Quantitative & Systems biology
                Quantitative & Systems biology

                Comments

                Comment on this article