483
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    39
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      The Cancer Cell Line Encyclopedia enables predictive modeling of anticancer drug sensitivity

      research-article
      1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 1 , 4 , 1 , 5 , 4 , 4 , 1 , 4 , 4 , 4 , 1 , 1 , 4 , 1 , 4 , 1 , 1 , 2 , 4 , 5 , 4 , 4 , 5 , 5 , 6 , 6 , 6 , 4 , 4 , 4 , 4 , 4 , 3 , 3 , 1 , 1 , 1 , 1 , 1 , 3 , 1 , 1 , 5 , 1 , 1 , 1 , 1 , 6 , 4 , 4 , 4 , 4 , 4 , 5 , 1 , 2 , 3 , 1 , 3 , 7 , 8 , 4 , 4 , 4 , 1 , 2 , 3
      Nature

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The systematic translation of cancer genomic data into knowledge of tumor biology and therapeutic avenues remains challenging. Such efforts should be greatly aided by robust preclinical model systems that reflect the genomic diversity of human cancers and for which detailed genetic and pharmacologic annotation is available 1 . Here we describe the Cancer Cell Line Encyclopedia (CCLE): a compilation of gene expression, chromosomal copy number, and massively parallel sequencing data from 947 human cancer cell lines. When coupled with pharmacologic profiles for 24 anticancer drugs across 479 of the lines, this collection allowed identification of genetic, lineage, and gene expression-based predictors of drug sensitivity. In addition to known predictors, we found that plasma cell lineage correlated with sensitivity to IGF1 receptor inhibitors; AHR expression was associated with MEK inhibitor efficacy in NRAS-mutant lines; and SLFN11 expression predicted sensitivity to topoisomerase inhibitors. Altogether, our results suggest that large, annotated cell line collections may help to enable preclinical stratification schemata for anticancer agents. The generation of genetic predictions of drug response in the preclinical setting and their incorporation into cancer clinical trial design could speed the emergence of “personalized” therapeutic regimens 2 .

          Related collections

          Most cited references27

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Regularization and variable selection via the elastic net

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            The landscape of somatic copy-number alteration across human cancers

            A powerful way to discover key genes playing causal roles in oncogenesis is to identify genomic regions that undergo frequent alteration in human cancers. Here, we report high-resolution analyses of somatic copy-number alterations (SCNAs) from 3131 cancer specimens, belonging largely to 26 histological types. We identify 158 regions of focal SCNA that are altered at significant frequency across multiple cancer types, of which 122 cannot be explained by the presence of a known cancer target gene located within these regions. Several gene families are enriched among these regions of focal SCNA, including the BCL2 family of apoptosis regulators and the NF-κB pathway. We show that cancer cells harboring amplifications surrounding the MCL1 and BCL2L1 anti-apoptotic genes depend upon expression of these genes for survival. Finally, we demonstrate that a large majority of SCNAs identified in individual cancer types are present in multiple cancer types.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Integrative genomic analyses identify MITF as a lineage survival oncogene amplified in malignant melanoma.

              Systematic analyses of cancer genomes promise to unveil patterns of genetic alterations linked to the genesis and spread of human cancers. High-density single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) arrays enable detailed and genome-wide identification of both loss-of-heterozygosity events and copy-number alterations in cancer. Here, by integrating SNP array-based genetic maps with gene expression signatures derived from NCI60 cell lines, we identified the melanocyte master regulator MITF (microphthalmia-associated transcription factor) as the target of a novel melanoma amplification. We found that MITF amplification was more prevalent in metastatic disease and correlated with decreased overall patient survival. BRAF mutation and p16 inactivation accompanied MITF amplification in melanoma cell lines. Ectopic MITF expression in conjunction with the BRAF(V600E) mutant transformed primary human melanocytes, and thus MITF can function as a melanoma oncogene. Reduction of MITF activity sensitizes melanoma cells to chemotherapeutic agents. Targeting MITF in combination with BRAF or cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitors may offer a rational therapeutic avenue into melanoma, a highly chemotherapy-resistant neoplasm. Together, these data suggest that MITF represents a distinct class of 'lineage survival' or 'lineage addiction' oncogenes required for both tissue-specific cancer development and tumour progression.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                0410462
                6011
                Nature
                Nature
                Nature
                0028-0836
                1476-4687
                5 March 2012
                28 March 2012
                29 September 2012
                : 483
                : 7391
                : 603-607
                Affiliations
                [1 ]The Broad Institute of Harvard and MIT, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02142, USA
                [2 ]Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA
                [3 ]Center for Cancer Genome Discovery, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA
                [4 ]Novartis Institutes for Biomedical Research, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, USA
                [5 ]Genomics Institute of the Novartis Research Foundation, San Diego, California 92121, USA
                [6 ]Novartis Institutes for Biomedical Research, Emeryville, California 94608, USA
                [7 ]Department of Pediatric Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA
                [8 ]Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Chevy Chase, Maryland 20815, USA
                Author notes
                []Correspondence and Requests for materials should be addressed to: Levi A. Garraway ( Levi_Garraway@ 123456dfci.harvard.edu ) or Robert Schlegel ( robert.schlegel@ 123456novartis.com )
                [*]

                These authors contributed equally to this work: see Author Contributions section for details

                [9]

                Present address: Novartis Institutes for Biomedical Research, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, USA

                [10]

                Present address: Sage Bionetworks, 1100 Fairview Ave. N., Seattle, WA 98109, USA

                [11]

                Present address: Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065

                Article
                nihpa361223
                10.1038/nature11003
                3320027
                22460905
                b73ba611-b6da-434a-88b3-432a40b1c9d2

                Users may view, print, copy, download and text and data- mine the content in such documents, for the purposes of academic research, subject always to the full Conditions of use: http://www.nature.com/authors/editorial_policies/license.html#terms

                History
                Funding
                Funded by: Office of the Director : NIH
                Award ID: DP2 OD002750-01 || OD
                Categories
                Article

                Uncategorized
                Uncategorized

                Comments

                Comment on this article