2
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Influence of vaccination of broiler chickens against Escherichia coli with live attenuated vaccine on general properties of E. coli population, IBV vaccination efficiency, and production parameters—a field experiment

      research-article
      1 , ,
      Poultry Science
      Elsevier
      E. coli, vaccination, broiler chicken, field condition

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Poultry colibacillosis has been one of the major causes behind economic losses in the poultry production; however, no effective method for its prevention has been developed so far. Vaccination against colibacillosis is capturing increasing interest. The aim of this study was to demonstrate benefits from using a live, aroA gene–deleted vaccine against colibacillosis in broiler chickens and its potential impact on reduced use of antibiotics, the efficacy of vaccination against infectious bronchitis ( IB), and the structure and properties of Escherichia coli population in broilers under commercial farm conditions. In 2 experiments, carried out on 3 farms, broiler chickens of one chicken house from each farm were vaccinated against Escherichia coli ( E. coli), whereas birds of other chicken houses of each farm were not vaccinated against E. coli. In experiment 1, which was carried out on 2 farms, for 3 consecutive production cycles, spray vaccination of day-old broilers against E. coli decreased the number of E. coli isolates from internal organs but not from the respiratory system in the sixth week of birds' life. In experiment 1, E. coli–vaccinated broilers did not receive the antimicrobials until 14 d after the vaccination. Escherichia coli isolates from the E. coli–vaccinated birds were more susceptible to the antimicrobials. Escherichia coli vaccination had no impact on the IB vaccination efficiency; it has reduced the mean number of days of the antimicrobial treatment and improved broiler production parameters. In experiment 2, chickens of both houses received the antimicrobials for the first 4 d of their life. Birds of chicken house 1 were vaccinated against E. coli on the ninth day of life, whereas birds of chicken house 2 were not vaccinated. In both houses, further antimicrobial usage was the same, and antimicrobials were not used until 14 d after E. coli vaccination. Similar to experiment 1, in experiment 2, vaccination decreased the number of E. coli isolates, and these isolates were more susceptible to the antimicrobials. Vaccination of broilers against E. coli should be considered in terms of routine immunoprophylaxis.

          Related collections

          Most cited references21

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found
          Is Open Access

          History of the use of antibiotic as growth promoters in European poultry feeds.

          Use of antibiotics as growth promoters in animal feeds has been permitted in the member states of the European Union during the last 50 yr. However, concerns about development of antimicrobial resistance and about transference of antibiotic resistance genes from animal to human microbiota, led to withdraw approval for antibiotics as growth promoters in the European Union since January 1, 2006. This report analyzes the history of European legislation regarding the use of antibiotics in poultry feeds, since the first harmonization by Directive 70/524 until Regulation 1831/2003 deleted these substances from the European Register of additives permitted in feeds. The European support to recommendations of the World Health Organization, the Food and Agriculture Organization, and the World Organization for Animal Health for a ban on antimicrobial use in animal feeds is expected to favor other countries also phase these substances out.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            Antimicrobial Resistance in Bacterial Poultry Pathogens: A Review

            Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a global health threat, and antimicrobial usage and AMR in animal production is one of its contributing sources. Poultry is one of the most widespread types of meat consumed worldwide. Poultry flocks are often raised under intensive conditions using large amounts of antimicrobials to prevent and to treat disease, as well as for growth promotion. Antimicrobial resistant poultry pathogens may result in treatment failure, leading to economic losses, but also be a source of resistant bacteria/genes (including zoonotic bacteria) that may represent a risk to human health. Here we reviewed data on AMR in 12 poultry pathogens, including avian pathogenic Escherichia coli (APEC), Salmonella Pullorum/Gallinarum, Pasteurella multocida, Avibacterium paragallinarum, Gallibacterium anatis, Ornitobacterium rhinotracheale (ORT), Bordetella avium, Clostridium perfringens, Mycoplasma spp., Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae, and Riemerella anatipestifer. A number of studies have demonstrated increases in resistance over time for S. Pullorum/Gallinarum, M. gallisepticum, and G. anatis. Among Enterobacteriaceae, APEC isolates displayed considerably higher levels of AMR compared with S. Pullorum/Gallinarum, with prevalence of resistance over >80% for ampicillin, amoxicillin, tetracycline across studies. Among the Gram-negative, non-Enterobacteriaceae pathogens, ORT had the highest levels of phenotypic resistance with median levels of AMR against co-trimoxazole, enrofloxacin, gentamicin, amoxicillin, and ceftiofur all exceeding 50%. In contrast, levels of resistance among P. multocida isolates were less than 20% for all antimicrobials. The study highlights considerable disparities in methodologies, as well as in criteria for phenotypic antimicrobial susceptibility testing and result interpretation. It is necessary to increase efforts to harmonize testing practices, and to promote free access to data on AMR in order to improve treatment guidelines as well as to monitor the evolution of AMR in poultry bacterial pathogens.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Avian Colibacillosis and Salmonellosis: A Closer Look at Epidemiology, Pathogenesis, Diagnosis, Control and Public Health Concerns

              Avian colibacillosis and salmonellosis are considered to be the major bacterial diseases in the poultry industry world-wide. Colibacillosis and salmonellosis are the most common avian diseases that are communicable to humans. This article provides the vital information on the epidemiology, pathogenesis, diagnosis, control and public health concerns of avian colibacillosis and salmonellosis. A better understanding of the information addressed in this review article will assist the poultry researchers and the poultry industry in continuing to make progress in reducing and eliminating avian colibacillosis and salmonellosis from the poultry flocks, thereby reducing potential hazards to the public health posed by these bacterial diseases.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Poult Sci
                Poult Sci
                Poultry Science
                Elsevier
                0032-5791
                1525-3171
                01 September 2020
                November 2020
                01 September 2020
                : 99
                : 11
                : 5452-5460
                Affiliations
                [1]Department of Avian Disease, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Warmia and Mazury, 10-719 Olsztyn, Poland
                Author notes
                [1 ]Corresponding author: marcin.smialek@ 123456uwm.edu.pl
                Article
                S0032-5791(20)30578-2
                10.1016/j.psj.2020.08.039
                7647908
                33142462
                b76b8f05-57cb-4260-b5be-e40d4f0bffb5
                © 2020 Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of Poultry Science Association Inc.

                This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

                History
                : 10 April 2020
                : 16 August 2020
                Categories
                Immunology, Health and Disease

                e. coli,vaccination,broiler chicken,field condition
                e. coli, vaccination, broiler chicken, field condition

                Comments

                Comment on this article