2
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Performance of initial LI-RADS 2018 treatment response in predicting survival of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma following TACE: a retrospective, single-center cohort study

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Purpose

          Treatment response following transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) is frequently evaluated with Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System Treatment Response (LR-TR) algorithm, but its association with patients’ outcomes is not supported in the literature. The purpose of this study was to provide such data.

          Methods

          A retrospective analysis of 99 TACE patients with stage A/B hepatocellular carcinoma according to Barcelona-Clinic Liver Cancer staging system was performed. Two radiologists assessed LR-TR, while a third radiologist re-assessed divergent results. Overall survival (OS) and time to disease progression (TTP) were the primary endpoints of the study, while the Cox proportional hazard model was used for outcome analyses.

          Results

          Interobserver agreement was substantial between the two readers with κ = 0.69 (95% CI 0.58–0.81). The median OS in viable, equivocal, and non-viable groups were 27, 27, and 73 months, respectively ( p < 0.001). However, after adjustment for confounding factors, there was no significant association between initial viable response and OS (HR 0.98 [95% CI 0.37–2.63], p = 0.97), while equivocal response remained statistically significant (HR 3.52. [95% CI 1.27–9.71], p = 0.015). No significant association was noted when viable and equivocal groups were analyzed in aggregate (HR 1.03 [95% CI 0.4–2.4], p = 0.96). The median TTP did not differ between non-viable and viable groups (23 vs 18 months, respectively; p = 0.98). None of the analyzed predictors was associated with TTP.

          Conclusion

          Initial LR-TR response was not an independent predictor for OS nor TTP. The preliminary results suggest the necessity for more aggressive management of equivocal patients.

          Related collections

          Most cited references40

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Diagnosis, Staging, and Management of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: 2018 Practice Guidance by the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Modified RECIST (mRECIST) assessment for hepatocellular carcinoma.

            The endpoint in cancer research is overall survival. Nonetheless, other potential surrogate endpoints, such as response rate and time to progression, are currently used. Measurement of response rate in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has become a controversial issue. The World Health Organization (WHO) criteria underestimate the actual response rate; thus, they were amended in 2000 by a panel of experts convened by the European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL) to take into account treatment-induced tumor necrosis. Applying these guidelines, there was an association between response rate and outcome prediction. More recently, the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) guideline was proposed as a method for measuring treatment response based on tumor shrinkage, which is a valuable measure of antitumor activity of cytotoxic drugs. This method was initially adopted by regulatory agencies, such as the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), for drug approval. However, anatomic tumor response metrics can be misleading when applied to molecular-targeted therapies or locoregional therapies in HCC. In 2008, a group of experts convened by the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD) developed a set of guidelines aimed at providing a common framework for the design of clinical trials in HCC and adapted the concept of viable tumor-tumoral tissue showing uptake in arterial phase of contrast-enhanced radiologic imaging techniques-to formally amend RECIST. These amendments conformed the AASLD-JNCI (Journal of the National Cancer Institute) guidelines and are summarized and clarified in the current article. They are referred to herein as the modified RECIST assessment (mRECIST). Further studies are needed to confirm the accuracy of this measurement compared with conventional gold standards such as pathologic studies of explanted livers.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found

              Hepatocellular carcinoma: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                jpodgo@gmail.com
                Journal
                J Cancer Res Clin Oncol
                J Cancer Res Clin Oncol
                Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology
                Springer Berlin Heidelberg (Berlin/Heidelberg )
                0171-5216
                1432-1335
                28 March 2021
                28 March 2021
                2021
                : 147
                : 12
                : 3673-3683
                Affiliations
                [1 ]GRID grid.13339.3b, ISNI 0000000113287408, Doctoral School, , Medical University of Warsaw, ; Warsaw, Poland
                [2 ]GRID grid.13339.3b, ISNI 0000000113287408, Second Department of Radiology, , Medical University of Warsaw, ; Ul. Banacha 1a, 02-097 Warsaw, Poland
                [3 ]GRID grid.13339.3b, ISNI 0000000113287408, Department of General, Transplant and Liver Surgery, , Medical University of Warsaw, ; Warsaw, Poland
                [4 ]GRID grid.13339.3b, ISNI 0000000113287408, Department of General, Gastroenterological and Oncological Surgery, , Medical University of Warsaw, ; Warsaw, Poland
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0043-4867
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8649-4165
                Article
                3603
                10.1007/s00432-021-03603-9
                8557150
                33778924
                b7731314-d985-489c-91c6-3ae15eff4276
                © The Author(s) 2021

                Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

                History
                : 23 January 2021
                : 16 March 2021
                Funding
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100004166, Warszawski Uniwersytet Medyczny;
                Award ID: 1W12/1/PUT/N/20
                Award Recipient :
                Categories
                Original Article – Clinical Oncology
                Custom metadata
                © Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2021

                Oncology & Radiotherapy
                li-rads,treatment response,tace,hcc,outcomes,survival,progression
                Oncology & Radiotherapy
                li-rads, treatment response, tace, hcc, outcomes, survival, progression

                Comments

                Comment on this article