22
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Children and young people’s versus parents’ responses in an English national inpatient survey

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Objective

          Despite growing interest in children and young people’s (CYP) perspectives on healthcare, they continue to be excluded from many patient experience surveys. This study investigated the feasibility of, and additional information gained by, measuring CYP experiences of a recent hospital admission.

          Design

          Cross-sectional analysis of national survey data.

          Setting

          Inpatients aged 8–15 years in eligible National Health Service hospitals, July–September 2014.

          Participants

          6204 parents/carers completed the parent section of the survey. The CYP section of the survey was completed by CYP themselves (n=3592), parents (n=849) or jointly (n=1763).

          Main outcome measures

          Pain relief, involvement, quality of staff communication, perceived safety, ward environment, overall experience.

          Analyses

          Single-measures intraclass correlations (ICCs) were used to assess the concordance between CYP and parent responses about the same inpatient episode. Multilevel logistic regression models, adjusted for individual characteristics, were used to compare the odds of positive responses when the CYP section of the survey was completed by parents, by CYP themselves or jointly.

          Results

          The CYP section of the survey was completed independently by 57.8% of CYP. Agreement between CYP and parent responses was reasonably good for pain relief (ICC=0.61 (95% CI 0.58 to 0.63)) and overall experience (ICC=0.70 (95% CI 0.68 to 0.72)), but much lower for questions comparing professionals’ communication with CYP and with their parents (ICC range=0.28 (95% CI 0.24 to 0.32) to 0.51 (95% CI 0.47 to 0.54)). In the regression models, CYP were significantly less likely than parents to report feeling safe (adjusted OR (AOR)=0.54 (95% CI 0.38 to 0.76)), involvement in decisions (AOR=0.66 (95% CI 0.46 to 0.94)) or adequate privacy (AOR=0.68 (95% CI 0.52 to 0.89)).

          Conclusions

          Including CYP (8–15 years) in patient experience surveys is feasible and enhances what is known from parents’ responses.

          Related collections

          Most cited references11

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          The Child Behavior Checklist and related forms for assessing behavioral/emotional problems and competencies.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            The Child Behavior Checklist and Related Forms for Assessing Behavioral/Emotional Problems and Competencies

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              The Development of a Pediatric Inpatient Experience of Care Measure: Child HCAHPS.

              The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) uses Adult Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (Adult HCAHPS) scores for public reporting and pay-for-performance for most US hospitals, but no publicly available standardized survey of inpatient experience of care exists for pediatrics. To fill the gap, CMS and the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality commissioned the development of a pediatric version (Child HCAHPS), a survey of parents/guardians of pediatric patients (<18 years old) who were recently hospitalized. This article describes the development of Child HCAHPS, which included an extensive review of the literature and quality measures, expert interviews, focus groups, cognitive testing, pilot testing of the draft survey, a national field test with 69 hospitals in 34 states, psychometric analysis, and end-user testing of the final survey. We conducted extensive validity and reliability testing to determine which items would be included in the final survey instrument and develop composite measures. We analyzed national field test data of 17,727 surveys collected in November 2012 to January 2014 from parents of recently hospitalized children. The final Child HCAHPS instrument has 62 items, including 39 patient experience items, 10 screeners, 12 demographic/descriptive items, and 1 open-ended item. The 39 experience items are categorized based on testing into 18 composite and single-item measures. Our composite and single-item measures demonstrated good to excellent hospital-level reliability at 300 responses per hospital. Child HCAHPS was developed to be a publicly available standardized survey of pediatric inpatient experience of care. It can be used to benchmark pediatric inpatient experience across hospitals and assist in efforts to improve the quality of inpatient care.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Arch Dis Child
                Arch. Dis. Child
                archdischild
                adc
                Archives of Disease in Childhood
                BMJ Publishing Group (BMA House, Tavistock Square, London, WC1H 9JR )
                0003-9888
                1468-2044
                May 2018
                6 February 2018
                : 103
                : 5
                : 486-491
                Affiliations
                [1 ] departmentPopulation, Policy and Practice Programme , UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health , London, UK
                [2 ] Picker Institute Europe , Oxford, UK
                [3 ] departmentDivision of General Pediatrics , Boston Children’s Hospital , Boston, Massachusetts, USA
                [4 ] departmentDepartment of Pediatrics , Harvard Medical School , Boston, Massachusetts, UK
                [5 ] Kaiser Permanente School of Medicine , Pasadena, USA
                [7 ] The Nuffield Trust , London, UK
                Author notes
                [Correspondence to ] Dr Dougal S Hargreaves, Population, Policy and Practice Programme, UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London, WC1N 1EH, UK; d.hargreaves@ 123456ucl.ac.uk
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0722-9847
                Article
                archdischild-2017-313801
                10.1136/archdischild-2017-313801
                5916103
                29434020
                b7a4a6fe-2c80-47a2-8445-bd28da560e2c
                © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2018. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted.

                This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/

                History
                : 25 July 2017
                : 28 November 2017
                : 14 December 2017
                Categories
                Original Article
                1506
                Custom metadata
                unlocked

                Medicine
                children,young people,patient perspective,inpatient experience,measurement
                Medicine
                children, young people, patient perspective, inpatient experience, measurement

                Comments

                Comment on this article