39
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
2 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Teacher and pupil perspectives on the use of Virtual Field Trips as physically active lessons

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Virtual Field Trips (VFTs) are emerging physically active lessons that combine curriculum content with globe-based movement using interactive whiteboards. No research has yet examined the acceptability of these sessions by target users. This study aimed to (1) assess current physically active lesson teaching practices, (2) assess teacher attitudes towards VFTs and (3) investigate pupil perceptions of VFTs.

          Methods

          Data was collected from teaching staff interviews (n = 12) and three elementary school pupil focus groups (k = 3, n = 18), with all participants provided with a sample VFT session. Thematic analysis was used to analyse data.

          Results

          Teachers described VFTs as a flexible teaching tool, allowing inclusive learning across abilities and a range of taught subjects. They stressed a packed curriculum may make delivering VFT sessions problematic and warned that some teachers may be resistant to their use of technology. Pupils enjoyed the ability to move in the classroom and the ability to share a new teaching experience with their peers.

          Conclusions

          This work suggests positive attitudes towards VFTs as novel, physically active lessons and identifies potential teacher concerns for consideration in forthcoming intervention planning. Future experimental work will assess if these attitudes persist during longitudinal exposure to VFTs.

          Related collections

          Most cited references73

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Using thematic analysis in psychology

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups.

            Qualitative research explores complex phenomena encountered by clinicians, health care providers, policy makers and consumers. Although partial checklists are available, no consolidated reporting framework exists for any type of qualitative design. To develop a checklist for explicit and comprehensive reporting of qualitative studies (in depth interviews and focus groups). We performed a comprehensive search in Cochrane and Campbell Protocols, Medline, CINAHL, systematic reviews of qualitative studies, author or reviewer guidelines of major medical journals and reference lists of relevant publications for existing checklists used to assess qualitative studies. Seventy-six items from 22 checklists were compiled into a comprehensive list. All items were grouped into three domains: (i) research team and reflexivity, (ii) study design and (iii) data analysis and reporting. Duplicate items and those that were ambiguous, too broadly defined and impractical to assess were removed. Items most frequently included in the checklists related to sampling method, setting for data collection, method of data collection, respondent validation of findings, method of recording data, description of the derivation of themes and inclusion of supporting quotations. We grouped all items into three domains: (i) research team and reflexivity, (ii) study design and (iii) data analysis and reporting. The criteria included in COREQ, a 32-item checklist, can help researchers to report important aspects of the research team, study methods, context of the study, findings, analysis and interpretations.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                e.norris.11@ucl.ac.uk
                n.shelton@ucl.ac.uk
                s.dunsmuir@ucl.ac.uk
                o.duke-williams@ucl.ac.uk
                emmanuel.stamatakis@sydney.edu.au
                Journal
                BMC Res Notes
                BMC Res Notes
                BMC Research Notes
                BioMed Central (London )
                1756-0500
                25 November 2015
                25 November 2015
                2015
                : 8
                : 719
                Affiliations
                [ ]Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, 1-19 Torrington Place, London, WC1E 7HB UK
                [ ]Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London, 26 Bedford Way, London, WC1H 0AP UK
                [ ]Department of Information Studies, University College London, Foster Court, London, WC1E 6BT UK
                [ ]Charles Perkins Centre, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
                [ ]Exercise and Sport Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
                Article
                1698
                10.1186/s13104-015-1698-3
                4660659
                26606892
                b7a8f11d-88bd-4c55-add9-166b43850eed
                © Norris et al. 2015

                Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

                History
                : 17 August 2015
                : 14 November 2015
                Categories
                Research Article
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2015

                Medicine
                virtual field trips,physically active lessons,qualitative,schools,children
                Medicine
                virtual field trips, physically active lessons, qualitative, schools, children

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_

                Similar content285

                Cited by4

                Most referenced authors920