1
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Clinical Super-Resolution Computed Tomography of Bone Microstructure: Application in Musculoskeletal and Dental Imaging

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Purpose

          Clinical cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) devices are limited to imaging features of half a millimeter in size and cannot quantify the tissue microstructure. We demonstrate a robust deep-learning method for enhancing clinical CT images, only requiring a limited set of easy-to-acquire training data.

          Methods

          Knee tissue from five cadavers and six total knee replacement patients, and 14 teeth from eight patients were scanned using laboratory CT as training data for the developed super-resolution (SR) technique. The method was benchmarked against ex vivo test set, 52 osteochondral samples are imaged with clinical and laboratory CT. A quality assurance phantom was imaged with clinical CT to quantify the technical image quality. To visually assess the clinical image quality, musculoskeletal and maxillofacial CBCT studies were enhanced with SR and contrasted to interpolated images. A dental radiologist and surgeon reviewed the maxillofacial images.

          Results

          The SR models predicted the bone morphological parameters on the ex vivo test set more accurately than conventional image processing. The phantom analysis confirmed higher spatial resolution on the SR images than interpolation, but image grayscales were modified. Musculoskeletal and maxillofacial CBCT images showed more details on SR than interpolation; however, artifacts were observed near the crown of the teeth. The readers assessed mediocre overall scores for both SR and interpolation. The source code and pretrained networks are publicly available.

          Conclusion

          Model training with laboratory modalities could push the resolution limit beyond state-of-the-art clinical musculoskeletal and dental CBCT. A larger maxillofacial training dataset is recommended for dental applications.

          Supplementary Information

          The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10439-024-03450-y.

          Related collections

          Most cited references51

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          A Threshold Selection Method from Gray-Level Histograms

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Guidelines for assessment of bone microstructure in rodents using micro-computed tomography.

            Use of high-resolution micro-computed tomography (microCT) imaging to assess trabecular and cortical bone morphology has grown immensely. There are several commercially available microCT systems, each with different approaches to image acquisition, evaluation, and reporting of outcomes. This lack of consistency makes it difficult to interpret reported results and to compare findings across different studies. This article addresses this critical need for standardized terminology and consistent reporting of parameters related to image acquisition and analysis, and key outcome assessments, particularly with respect to ex vivo analysis of rodent specimens. Thus the guidelines herein provide recommendations regarding (1) standardized terminology and units, (2) information to be included in describing the methods for a given experiment, and (3) a minimal set of outcome variables that should be reported. Whereas the specific research objective will determine the experimental design, these guidelines are intended to ensure accurate and consistent reporting of microCT-derived bone morphometry and density measurements. In particular, the methods section for papers that present microCT-based outcomes must include details of the following scan aspects: (1) image acquisition, including the scanning medium, X-ray tube potential, and voxel size, as well as clear descriptions of the size and location of the volume of interest and the method used to delineate trabecular and cortical bone regions, and (2) image processing, including the algorithms used for image filtration and the approach used for image segmentation. Morphometric analyses should be based on 3D algorithms that do not rely on assumptions about the underlying structure whenever possible. When reporting microCT results, the minimal set of variables that should be used to describe trabecular bone morphometry includes bone volume fraction and trabecular number, thickness, and separation. The minimal set of variables that should be used to describe cortical bone morphometry includes total cross-sectional area, cortical bone area, cortical bone area fraction, and cortical thickness. Other variables also may be appropriate depending on the research question and technical quality of the scan. Standard nomenclature, outlined in this article, should be followed for reporting of results. 2010 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              The Gender Citation Gap in International Relations

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                santeri.rytky@oulu.fi
                Journal
                Ann Biomed Eng
                Ann Biomed Eng
                Annals of Biomedical Engineering
                Springer International Publishing (Cham )
                0090-6964
                1573-9686
                15 February 2024
                15 February 2024
                2024
                : 52
                : 5
                : 1255-1269
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Research Unit of Health Sciences and Technology, University of Oulu, ( https://ror.org/03yj89h83) POB 5000, 90014 Oulu, Finland
                [2 ]Neurocenter Oulu, Oulu University Hospital, ( https://ror.org/045ney286) Oulu, Finland
                [3 ]Medical Research Center, University of Oulu, ( https://ror.org/03yj89h83) Oulu, Finland
                [4 ]Department of Radiotherapy, Oulu University Hospital, ( https://ror.org/045ney286) Oulu, Finland
                [5 ]Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Oulu University Hospital, ( https://ror.org/045ney286) Oulu, Finland
                [6 ]Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Oulu University Hospital, ( https://ror.org/045ney286) Oulu, Finland
                [7 ]Department of Surgery and Intensive Care, Oulu University Hospital, ( https://ror.org/045ney286) Oulu, Finland
                [8 ]Cancer and Translational Medical Research Unit, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oulu, ( https://ror.org/03yj89h83) Oulu, Finland
                [9 ]Department of Orthopaedics, Traumatology and Hand Surgery, Kuopio University Hospital, ( https://ror.org/00fqdfs68) Kuopio, Finland
                [10 ]Department of Applied Physics, University of Eastern Finland, ( https://ror.org/00cyydd11) Kuopio, Finland
                Author notes

                Associate Editor Stefan M. Duma oversaw the review of this article.

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9237-1356
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7852-4141
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3348-5759
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3401-4198
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7122-2335
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2135-6922
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0055-5183
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1428-5700
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4245-8186
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3486-7855
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2850-5484
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5591-3726
                Article
                3450
                10.1007/s10439-024-03450-y
                10995025
                38361137
                b7b287a6-de7b-4385-96ff-1de824df34dd
                © The Author(s) 2024

                Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

                History
                : 17 August 2023
                : 9 January 2024
                Funding
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100008413, Instrumentariumin Tiedesäätiö;
                Award ID: 200058
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100003125, Suomen Kulttuurirahasto;
                Award ID: 00200953
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100011199, FP7 Ideas: European Research Council;
                Award ID: 336267
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100002341, Academy of Finland;
                Award ID: 268378
                Award ID: 303786
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: University of Oulu (including Oulu University Hospital)
                Categories
                Original Article
                Custom metadata
                © Biomedical Engineering Society 2024

                Biomedical engineering
                super-resolution,deep learning,computed tomography,cone-beam computed tomography,musculoskeletal radiology,dental radiology

                Comments

                Comment on this article