7
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares

      Call for Papers: Supportive Care - Essential for Modern Oncology

      Submit here before December 31, 2024

      About Oncology Research and Treatment: 2.0 Impact Factor I 3.2 CiteScore I 0.521 Scimago Journal & Country Rank (SJR)

      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found

      Patients with Breast Cancer and Negative Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy without Additional Axillary Lymph Node Dissection: A Follow-Up Study of up to 5 Years

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Objective: To analyze the rate of axillary recurrences and survival in patients operated on for breast cancer who had not undergone an axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) because of a negative sentinel node biopsy. Methods: The study includes 97 patients operated on for breast cancer and selective node biopsy from June 2000 to December 2001 who had a negative sentinel node biopsy and did not undergo ALND. Mean age was 58.2 years (55.9–60.5). Follow-up was done up to 5 years. After surgery all patients underwent clinical examination. Complementary treatment depended on the hospital protocol. Rate of axillary recurrences, presence of distant metastases and survival (Kaplan-Meier method) were studied. Results: After a median follow-up of 4.1 years (2.18–5.25), only 2/95 patients (2.1%) developed distant metastases. Four patients died but only the death of the patient who presented multiple metastases was related to the primary breast cancer (1%). The 5-year overall survival rate was 96%. Conclusions: (1) Only 1/95 patients studied developed nodal extra-axillary recurrence together with distant metastases. (2) The results obtained support the selective sentinel node biopsy as an accurate technique in the axillary stratification of patients with breast cancer, offering in the cases of negative sentinel node biopsy a safe axillary control after a 5-year follow-up.

          Related collections

          Most cited references32

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          A randomized comparison of sentinel-node biopsy with routine axillary dissection in breast cancer.

          Although numerous studies have shown that the status of the sentinel node is an accurate predictor of the status of the axillary nodes in breast cancer, the efficacy and safety of sentinel-node biopsy require validation. From March 1998 to December 1999, we randomly assigned 516 patients with primary breast cancer in whom the tumor was less than or equal to 2 cm in diameter either to sentinel-node biopsy and total axillary dissection (the axillary-dissection group) or to sentinel-node biopsy followed by axillary dissection only if the sentinel node contained metastases (the sentinel-node group). The number of sentinel nodes found was the same in the two groups. A sentinel node was positive in 83 of the 257 patients in the axillary-dissection group (32.3 percent), and in 92 of the 259 patients in the sentinel-node group (35.5 percent). In the axillary-dissection group, the overall accuracy of the sentinel-node status was 96.9 percent, the sensitivity 91.2 percent, and the specificity 100 percent. There was less pain and better arm mobility in the patients who underwent sentinel-node biopsy only than in those who also underwent axillary dissection. There were 15 events associated with breast cancer in the axillary-dissection group and 10 such events in the sentinel-node group. Among the 167 patients who did not undergo axillary dissection, there were no cases of overt axillary metastasis during follow-up. Sentinel-node biopsy is a safe and accurate method of screening the axillary nodes for metastasis in women with a small breast cancer. Copyright 2003 Massachusetts Medical Society
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Surgical resection and radiolocalization of the sentinel lymph node in breast cancer using a gamma probe.

            We have recently reported on a technique of gamma probe localization of radiolabelled lymph nodes to identify the sentinel node in malignant melanoma. In order to determine whether this technique is applicable to assist in staging breast cancer, a pilot study was begun to address two questions: (i) can the sentinel lymph node draining a breast cancer be identified for selective resection; and (ii) is the sentinel lymph node predictive of the status of the entire axillary lymph nodes? One to four hours prior to axillary lymph node dissection, 22 consecutive patients had approximately 0.4 mCi of technetium sulfur colloid in 0.5 ml saline injected around the perimeter of the breast lesion. A hand-held gamma counter was used at surgery to locate the lymph node(s) receiving drainage from the breast. A sentinel lymph node was identified in 18 of 22 patients. Of these 18 patients, the sentinel lymph node was positive in seven of seven patients, with pathologically verified metastatic breast cancer to at least one lymph node. In three out of seven patients, the sentinel lymph node was the only lymph node with metastatic cancer. In this pilot study of breast cancer patients, we conclude that: (i) radiolocalization and selective resection of sentinel lymph nodes is possible; and (ii) the sentinel lymph node appears to predict correctly the status of the remaining axilla. These data justify a larger clinical trial to verify the value of this technique.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Ten-year results of a randomized clinical trial comparing radical mastectomy and total mastectomy with or without radiation.

              In 1971 we began a randomized trial to compare alternative local and regional treatments of breast cancer, all of which employ breast removal. Life-table estimates were obtained for 1665 women enrolled in the study for a mean of 126 months. There were no significant differences among three groups of patients with clinically negative axillary nodes, with respect to disease-free survival, distant-disease--free survival, or overall survival (about 57 per cent) at 10 years. The patients were treated by radical mastectomy, total ("simple") mastectomy without axillary dissection but with regional irradiation, or total mastectomy without irradiation plus axillary dissection only if nodes were subsequently positive. Similarly, no differences were observed between patients with clinically positive nodes treated by radical mastectomy or by total mastectomy without axillary dissection but with regional irradiation. Survival at 10 years was about 38 per cent in both groups. Our findings indicate that the location of a breast tumor does not influence the prognosis and that irradiation of internal mammary nodes in patients with inner-quadrant lesions does not improve survival. The data also demonstrate that the results obtained at five years accurately predict the outcome at 10 years. We conclude that the variations of local and regional treatment used in this study are not important in determining survival of patients with breast cancer.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                OCL
                Oncology
                10.1159/issn.0030-2414
                Oncology
                S. Karger AG
                0030-2414
                1423-0232
                2007
                November 2007
                12 November 2007
                : 72
                : 1-2
                : 27-32
                Affiliations
                Departments of aNuclear Medicine and bGynecology, Universitary Hospital of Bellvitge-IDIBELL, Barcelona, Spain
                Article
                111085 Oncology 2007;72:27–32
                10.1159/000111085
                17998787
                b7bad258-60ee-4c61-a5e4-266e43b4ea4e
                © 2007 S. Karger AG, Basel

                Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug. Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.

                History
                : 20 June 2007
                : 21 June 2007
                Page count
                Figures: 1, Tables: 2, References: 40, Pages: 6
                Categories
                Clinical Study

                Oncology & Radiotherapy,Pathology,Surgery,Obstetrics & Gynecology,Pharmacology & Pharmaceutical medicine,Hematology
                Axillary lymph node dissection,Breast cancer,Sentinel node,Axillary recurrence

                Comments

                Comment on this article