12
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found

      Neointimal Expression of Rapamycin Receptor FK506-Binding Protein FKBP12: Postinjury Animal and Human In-Stent Restenosis Tissue Characteristics

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Despite excellent clinical results for sirolimus (rapamycin)-eluting stents, the exact mechanisms of antirestenotic activity and affected cellular targets are incompletely understood. Therefore, we determined the presence and tem- porospatial expression pattern of FKBP12, the primary intracellular receptor of rapamycin, in rat carotid arteries after balloon injury, as well as in human in-stent restenosis and primary stable coronary atheroma. FKBP12 expression was assessed by immunohistochemistry. Rat carotid arteries revealed maximal expression in 57.7 ± 4.0% of neointimal cells at day 7. A large proportion of these FKBP12+ cells showed luminally confined co-expression with dendritic cell markers. Despite a considerably thicker neointima at day 28, presence of FKBP12 decreased (8.5 ± 1.9%, p = 0.02) with a scattered pattern in luminal and deep neointima. Likewise, human in-stent restenosis atherectomy specimens (time after stent implantation 2–12 months) revealed a comparable extent of cellular rapamycin receptor expression (9.3 ± 1.0%) that significantly differed from that found in primary stable atheroma (1.3 ± 0.4%, p < 0.001). In conclusion, the rapamycin receptor is predominantly present during early neointima formation, while mature neointimal atheromas show a relatively low expression without confinement to luminal areas. Co-expression of FKBP12 and dendritic cell markers suggests that dendritic cells may be another important target for early and long-term rapamycin effects.

          Related collections

          Most cited references19

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          A randomized comparison of a sirolimus-eluting stent with a standard stent for coronary revascularization.

          The need for repeated treatment of restenosis of a treated vessel remains the main limitation of percutaneous coronary revascularization. Because sirolimus (rapamycin) inhibits the proliferation of lymphocytes and smooth-muscle cells, we compared a sirolimus-eluting stent with a standard uncoated stent in patients with angina pectoris. We performed a randomized, double-blind trial to compare the two types of stents for revascularization of single, primary lesions in native coronary arteries. The trial included 238 patients at 19 medical centers. The primary end point was in-stent late luminal loss (the difference between the minimal luminal diameter immediately after the procedure and the diameter at six months). Secondary end points included the percentage of in-stent stenosis of the luminal diameter and the rate of restenosis (luminal narrowing of 50 percent or more). We also analyzed a composite clinical end point consisting of death, myocardial infarction, and percutaneous or surgical revascularization at 1, 6, and 12 months. At six months, the degree of neointimal proliferation, manifested as the mean (+/-SD) late luminal loss, was significantly lower in the sirolimus-stent group (-0.01+/-0.33 mm) than in the standard-stent group (0.80+/-0.53 mm, P<0.001). None of the patients in the sirolimus-stent group, as compared with 26.6 percent of those in the standard-stent group, had restenosis of 50 percent or more of the luminal diameter (P<0.001). There were no episodes of stent thrombosis. During a follow-up period of up to one year, the overall rate of major cardiac events was 5.8 percent in the sirolimus-stent group and 28.8 percent in the standard-stent group (P<0.001). The difference was due entirely to a higher rate of revascularization of the target vessel in the standard-stent group. As compared with a standard coronary stent, a sirolimus-eluting stent shows considerable promise for the prevention of neointimal proliferation, restenosis, and associated clinical events.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Rapamune (RAPA, rapamycin, sirolimus): mechanism of action immunosuppressive effect results from blockade of signal transduction and inhibition of cell cycle progression.

            Rapamune is a novel immunosuppressive agent in Phase III clinical trial in renal transplantation. Its unique mechanism of action has created great interest in its use as a biochemical probe of signal transduction pathways that has provided insight into its molecular mechanism of action. This article reviews the current state of our understanding of the mechanism of action of rapamune.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Morphological predictors of restenosis after coronary stenting in humans.

              Experimental studies suggest that arterial injury and inflammation lead to increased neointimal growth after stenting. Despite the increased use of coronary stents in humans, there are only limited pathological data on the morphological features of in-stent restenosis. Detailed histology was performed on 116 stents, implanted > or =90 days in 87 coronary arteries, from 56 patients (mean age, 59+/-13 years). The mean duration of stent implant was 10 months. In-stent restenosis was defined as a stent area stenosis of >75%. Lumen area increased as stent area increased (r2=0.27, P=0.0001), but there was a much stronger correlation between stent area and neointimal area (r2=0.70, P<0.0001). Arterial medial fracture was associated with a 29% increase (P<0.01) in neointimal thickness compared with arteries with an intact media. Neointimal thickness (P=0.0001), inflammatory cell density (P<0.0001), and neointimal vascular channel density (P<0.0001) were greater when struts were in contact with a ruptured arterial media compared with fibrous plaque or an intact fibrous cap. Stent strut penetration into a lipid core was associated with increased neointimal thickness (P=0.04) and inflammatory cell density (P=0.03). Neointimal inflammatory cell content was 2.4-fold greater in stents with restenosis versus no restenosis, and inflammation was associated with increased neoangiogenesis. Coronary stenting that is accompanied by medial damage or penetration of the stent into a lipid core induces increased arterial inflammation, which is associated with increased neointimal growth. These data suggest the use of stenting strategies that reduce inflammation and neoangiogenesis to reduce the incidence of restenosis.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                JVR
                J Vasc Res
                10.1159/issn.1018-1172
                Journal of Vascular Research
                S. Karger AG
                1018-1172
                1423-0135
                2008
                February 2008
                26 October 2007
                : 45
                : 2
                : 173-178
                Affiliations
                aDepartment of Internal Medicine II – Cardiology, University of Bonn, Bonn, and bDepartment of Internal Medicine I – Cardiology, Klinikum Meiningen, Meiningen, Germany
                Article
                110417 J Vasc Res 2008;45:173–178
                10.1159/000110417
                17962721
                b7c1d073-e69f-41cc-a8bd-f72f46078fa6
                © 2007 S. Karger AG, Basel

                Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug. Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.

                History
                : 11 January 2007
                : 08 August 2007
                Page count
                Figures: 2, Tables: 1, References: 24, Pages: 6
                Categories
                Research Paper

                General medicine,Neurology,Cardiovascular Medicine,Internal medicine,Nephrology
                Rapamycin,In-stent restenosis,Dendritic cells,Drug-eluting stents

                Comments

                Comment on this article