15
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Estresse e bem-estar no trabalho: o papel moderador da regulação emocional Translated title: Estrés y bienestar en el trabajo: el papel moderador de la regulación emocional Translated title: Stress and well-being at work: the moderating role of emotion regulation

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          O objetivo deste estudo foi testar a moderação de estratégias de regulação emocional ascendente e descendente nas relações entre estresse percebido e bem-estar no trabalho. Participaram 480 trabalhadores da indústria que responderam à escala de estresse no trabalho, à medida de regulação emocional adaptada para o contexto de trabalho e à escala de bem-estar no trabalho. Os resultados apontaram correlações entre estresse, regulação emocional e bem-estar. O estresse foi preditor negativo de bem-estar no trabalho (BET), e as estratégias adaptativas (regulação ascendente) e funcionais (regulação descendente) foram preditoras positivas de BET. Os resultados ainda sugerem que a percepção de estresse elevada está associada a maior uso de estratégias de regulação desadaptativas e disfuncionais. Uma das conclusões é que o controle do nível de estresse no ambiente laboral pode ajudar o trabalhador a preservar o bem-estar no trabalho fazendo melhor uso de seus processos regulatórios.

          Translated abstract

          El objetivo de este estudio fue probar la moderación de estrategias de regulación emocional ascendente y descendente en las relaciones entre estrés percibido y bienestar en el trabajo. Participaron 480 trabajadores de la industria, quienes respondieron a la escala de estrés en el trabajo, a la medida de regulación emocional adaptada al contexto de trabajo y a la escala de bienestar en el trabajo. Los resultados apuntaron correlaciones entre estrés, regulación emocional y bienestar. El estrés fue predictor negativo de bienestar en el trabajo (BET), y las estrategias adaptativas (regulación ascendente) y funcionales (regulación descendente) fueron pronosticadoras positivas de BET. Los resultados sugieren, además, que la percepción de estrés elevada está asociada con un mayor uso de estrategias de regulación no adaptativas y disfuncionales. Una de las conclusiones es que el control del nivel de estrés en el ambiente laboral puede ayudar al trabajador a preservar el bienestar en el trabajo haciendo mejor uso de sus procesos regulatorios.

          Translated abstract

          The objective of this study was to test the moderation of up and down emotion regulation strategies in the relationships between perceived stress and well-being at work. Participants included 480 industry workers who completed the work stress scale, the emotion regulation measure adapted to the work context, and the well-being at work scale. The results showed correlations between stress, emotional regulation, and well-being. Stress was a negative predictor, and adaptive (up regulation) and functional (down regulation) strategies were positive predictors of well-being at work. The results also suggest that the perception of high stress is associated with greater use of maladaptive and dysfunctional regulation strategies. One of the conclusions is that controlling the level of stress in the work environment can help the worker preserve well-being, making better use of regulation processes.

          Related collections

          Most cited references42

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Dealing with feeling: a meta-analysis of the effectiveness of strategies derived from the process model of emotion regulation.

          The present meta-analysis investigated the effectiveness of strategies derived from the process model of emotion regulation in modifying emotional outcomes as indexed by experiential, behavioral, and physiological measures. A systematic search of the literature identified 306 experimental comparisons of different emotion regulation (ER) strategies. ER instructions were coded according to a new taxonomy, and meta-analysis was used to evaluate the effectiveness of each strategy across studies. The findings revealed differences in effectiveness between ER processes: Attentional deployment had no effect on emotional outcomes (d(+) = 0.00), response modulation had a small effect (d(+) = 0.16), and cognitive change had a small-to-medium effect (d(+) = 0.36). There were also important within-process differences. We identified 7 types of attentional deployment, 4 types of cognitive change, and 4 types of response modulation, and these distinctions had a substantial influence on effectiveness. Whereas distraction was an effective way to regulate emotions (d(+) = 0.27), concentration was not (d(+) = -0.26). Similarly, suppressing the expression of emotion proved effective (d(+) = 0.32), but suppressing the experience of emotion or suppressing thoughts of the emotion-eliciting event did not (d(+) = -0.04 and -0.12, respectively). Finally, reappraising the emotional response proved less effective (d(+) = 0.23) than reappraising the emotional stimulus (d(+) = 0.36) or using perspective taking (d(+) = 0.45). The review also identified several moderators of strategy effectiveness including factors related to the (a) to-be-regulated emotion, (b) frequency of use and intended purpose of the ER strategy, (c) study design, and (d) study characteristics.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Recovery from job stress: The stressor-detachment model as an integrative framework

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Explicit and implicit emotion regulation: a dual-process framework.

              It is widely acknowledged that emotions can be regulated in an astonishing variety of ways. Most research to date has focused on explicit (effortful) forms of emotion regulation. However, there is growing research interest in implicit (automatic) forms of emotion regulation. To organise emerging findings, we present a dual-process framework that integrates explicit and implicit forms of emotion regulation, and argue that both forms of regulation are necessary for well-being. In the first section of this review, we provide a broad overview of the construct of emotion regulation, with an emphasis on explicit and implicit processes. In the second section, we focus on explicit emotion regulation, considering both neural mechanisms that are associated with these processes and their experiential and physiological consequences. In the third section, we turn to several forms of implicit emotion regulation, and integrate the burgeoning literature in this area. We conclude by outlining open questions and areas for future research. © 2011 Psychology Press, an imprint of the Taylor & Francis Group, an Informa business
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: ND
                Role: ND
                Role: ND
                Role: ND
                Journal
                rpot
                Revista Psicologia Organizações e Trabalho
                Rev. Psicol., Organ. Trab.
                Associação Brasileira de Psicologia Organizacional e do Trabalho (SBPOT) (Brasília, DF, Brazil )
                1984-6657
                June 2019
                : 19
                : 1
                : 532-540
                Affiliations
                [1] Salvador Bahia orgnameUniversidade Federal da Bahia Brasil
                [2] Salvador Bahia orgnameUniversidade Federal da Bahia Brasil
                Article
                S1984-66572019000100004
                10.17652/rpot/2019.1.14774
                b80eaecc-87e8-4c14-adc9-0414691daa19

                This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

                History
                : 09 December 2018
                : 12 December 2017
                : 09 December 2018
                Page count
                Figures: 0, Tables: 0, Equations: 0, References: 75, Pages: 9
                Product

                SciELO Periódicos Eletrônicos em Psicologia

                Categories
                Artigos

                well-being,estrés ocupacional,regulación emocional,bienestar,occupational stress,emotional regulation,estresse ocupacional,regulação emocional,bem-estar

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_

                Similar content1,047

                Cited by11

                Most referenced authors427