35
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Where is the UK's pollinator biodiversity? The importance of urban areas for flower-visiting insects

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Insect pollinators provide a crucial ecosystem service, but are under threat. Urban areas could be important for pollinators, though their value relative to other habitats is poorly known. We compared pollinator communities using quantified flower-visitation networks in 36 sites (each 1 km 2) in three landscapes: urban, farmland and nature reserves. Overall, flower-visitor abundance and species richness did not differ significantly between the three landscape types. Bee abundance did not differ between landscapes, but bee species richness was higher in urban areas than farmland. Hoverfly abundance was higher in farmland and nature reserves than urban sites, but species richness did not differ significantly. While urban pollinator assemblages were more homogeneous across space than those in farmland or nature reserves, there was no significant difference in the numbers of rarer species between the three landscapes. Network-level specialization was higher in farmland than urban sites. Relative to other habitats, urban visitors foraged from a greater number of plant species (higher generality) but also visited a lower proportion of available plant species (higher specialization), both possibly driven by higher urban plant richness. Urban areas are growing, and improving their value for pollinators should be part of any national strategy to conserve and restore pollinators.

          Related collections

          Most cited references19

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Effects of urbanization on species richness: A review of plants and animals

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Crop pollination from native bees at risk from agricultural intensification.

            Ecosystem services are critical to human survival; in selected cases, maintaining these services provides a powerful argument for conserving biodiversity. Yet, the ecological and economic underpinnings of most services are poorly understood, impeding their conservation and management. For centuries, farmers have imported colonies of European honey bees (Apis mellifera) to fields and orchards for pollination services. These colonies are becoming increasingly scarce, however, because of diseases, pesticides, and other impacts. Native bee communities also provide pollination services, but the amount they provide and how this varies with land management practices are unknown. Here, we document the individual species and aggregate community contributions of native bees to crop pollination, on farms that varied both in their proximity to natural habitat and management type (organic versus conventional). On organic farms near natural habitat, we found that native bee communities could provide full pollination services even for a crop with heavy pollination requirements (e.g., watermelon, Citrullus lanatus), without the intervention of managed honey bees. All other farms, however, experienced greatly reduced diversity and abundance of native bees, resulting in insufficient pollination services from native bees alone. We found that diversity was essential for sustaining the service, because of year-to-year variation in community composition. Continued degradation of the agro-natural landscape will destroy this "free" service, but conservation and restoration of bee habitat are potentially viable economic alternatives for reducing dependence on managed honey bees.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Decline and conservation of bumble bees.

              Declines in bumble bee species in the past 60 years are well documented in Europe, where they are driven primarily by habitat loss and declines in floral abundance and diversity resulting from agricultural intensification. Impacts of habitat degradation and fragmentation are likely to be compounded by the social nature of bumble bees and their largely monogamous breeding system, which renders their effective population size low. Hence, populations are susceptible to stochastic extinction events and inbreeding. In North America, catastrophic declines of some bumble bee species since the 1990s are probably attributable to the accidental introduction of a nonnative parasite from Europe, a result of global trade in domesticated bumble bee colonies used for pollination of greenhouse crops. Given the importance of bumble bees as pollinators of crops and wildflowers, steps must be taken to prevent further declines. Suggested measures include tight regulation of commercial bumble bee use and targeted use of environmentally comparable schemes to enhance floristic diversity in agricultural landscapes.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Proc Biol Sci
                Proc. Biol. Sci
                RSPB
                royprsb
                Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
                The Royal Society
                0962-8452
                1471-2954
                22 March 2015
                22 March 2015
                : 282
                : 1803
                : 20142849
                Affiliations
                [1 ]School of Biological Sciences, University of Bristol , Life Sciences Building, Bristol BS8 1TQ, UK
                [2 ]Cabot Institute, University of Bristol , Bristol BS8 1UJ, UK
                [3 ]School of Biology, University of Leeds , Leeds LS2 9JT, UK
                [4 ]School of Civil Engineering and Geosciences, Newcastle University , Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 7RU, UK
                [5 ]Institute of Evolutionary Biology, University of Edinburgh , Kings Buildings, Edinburgh EH9 3JT, UK
                [6 ]School of Agriculture, Policy and Development, University of Reading , Reading RG6 6AR, UK
                [7 ]Cardiff School of Biosciences, Cardiff University , Museum Avenue, Cardiff CF10 3AX, UK
                Author notes
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6849-8747
                Article
                rspb20142849
                10.1098/rspb.2014.2849
                4345454
                25673686
                b80fd263-26bb-4484-a50f-7ccbebf20950

                © 2015 The Authors. Published by the Royal Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/, which permits unrestricted use, provided the original author and source are credited.

                History
                : 19 November 2014
                : 7 January 2015
                Categories
                1001
                60
                Research Articles
                Custom metadata
                March 22, 2015

                Life sciences
                pollinators,networks,urban
                Life sciences
                pollinators, networks, urban

                Comments

                Comment on this article