271
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    61
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Molecular subgroups of medulloblastoma: the current consensus

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Medulloblastoma, a small blue cell malignancy of the cerebellum, is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in pediatric oncology. Current mechanisms for clinical prognostication and stratification include clinical factors (age, presence of metastases, and extent of resection) as well as histological subgrouping (classic, desmoplastic, and large cell/anaplastic histology). Transcriptional profiling studies of medulloblastoma cohorts from several research groups around the globe have suggested the existence of multiple distinct molecular subgroups that differ in their demographics, transcriptomes, somatic genetic events, and clinical outcomes. Variations in the number, composition, and nature of the subgroups between studies brought about a consensus conference in Boston in the fall of 2010. Discussants at the conference came to a consensus that the evidence supported the existence of four main subgroups of medulloblastoma (Wnt, Shh, Group 3, and Group 4). Participants outlined the demographic, transcriptional, genetic, and clinical differences between the four subgroups. While it is anticipated that the molecular classification of medulloblastoma will continue to evolve and diversify in the future as larger cohorts are studied at greater depth, herein we outline the current consensus nomenclature, and the differences between the medulloblastoma subgroups.

          Related collections

          Most cited references38

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Molecular subclasses of high-grade glioma predict prognosis, delineate a pattern of disease progression, and resemble stages in neurogenesis.

          Previously undescribed prognostic subclasses of high-grade astrocytoma are identified and discovered to resemble stages in neurogenesis. One tumor class displaying neuronal lineage markers shows longer survival, while two tumor classes enriched for neural stem cell markers display equally short survival. Poor prognosis subclasses exhibit markers either of proliferation or of angiogenesis and mesenchyme. Upon recurrence, tumors frequently shift toward the mesenchymal subclass. Chromosomal locations of genes distinguishing tumor subclass parallel DNA copy number differences between subclasses. Functional relevance of tumor subtype molecular signatures is suggested by the ability of cell line signatures to predict neurosphere growth. A robust two-gene prognostic model utilizing PTEN and DLL3 expression suggests that Akt and Notch signaling are hallmarks of poor prognosis versus better prognosis gliomas, respectively.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Molecular Classification of Cancer: Class Discovery and Class Prediction by Gene Expression Monitoring

            T. Golub (1999)
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Classification of human lung carcinomas by mRNA expression profiling reveals distinct adenocarcinoma subclasses.

              We have generated a molecular taxonomy of lung carcinoma, the leading cause of cancer death in the United States and worldwide. Using oligonucleotide microarrays, we analyzed mRNA expression levels corresponding to 12,600 transcript sequences in 186 lung tumor samples, including 139 adenocarcinomas resected from the lung. Hierarchical and probabilistic clustering of expression data defined distinct subclasses of lung adenocarcinoma. Among these were tumors with high relative expression of neuroendocrine genes and of type II pneumocyte genes, respectively. Retrospective analysis revealed a less favorable outcome for the adenocarcinomas with neuroendocrine gene expression. The diagnostic potential of expression profiling is emphasized by its ability to discriminate primary lung adenocarcinomas from metastases of extra-pulmonary origin. These results suggest that integration of expression profile data with clinical parameters could aid in diagnosis of lung cancer patients.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                mdtaylor@sickkids.ca
                s.pfister@dkfz.de
                Journal
                Acta Neuropathol
                Acta Neuropathologica
                Springer-Verlag (Berlin/Heidelberg )
                0001-6322
                1432-0533
                2 December 2011
                2 December 2011
                April 2012
                : 123
                : 4
                : 465-472
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Division of Neurosurgery, Hospital for Sick Children, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
                [2 ]Program in Developmental and Stem Cell Biology, Arthur and Sonia Labatt Brain Tumour Research Centre, Hospital for Sick Children, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
                [3 ]Clinical Cooperation Unit Neuropathology, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
                [4 ]Division of Molecular Genetics, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
                [5 ]Department of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
                [6 ]Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, USA
                [7 ]Northern Institute for Cancer Research, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
                [8 ]Departments of Pathology, Ophthalmology and Oncology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, USA
                [9 ]Department of Pediatrics, Texas Children’s Cancer Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, USA
                [10 ]Department of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
                [11 ]Department of Oncology, St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital, Memphis, USA
                [12 ]Department of Pathology, St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital, Memphis, USA
                [13 ]Department of Developmental Neurobiology, St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital, Memphis, USA
                [14 ]Department of Neurology, Children’s Hospital Boston, Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA
                Article
                922
                10.1007/s00401-011-0922-z
                3306779
                22134537
                b836d31d-2ce0-44c3-8371-b848d935539b
                © The Author(s) 2011
                History
                : 6 October 2011
                : 19 November 2011
                : 22 November 2011
                Categories
                Consensus Paper
                Custom metadata
                © Springer-Verlag 2012

                Neurology
                group 4,group 3,consensus,wnt,shh,medulloblastoma,subgroups
                Neurology
                group 4, group 3, consensus, wnt, shh, medulloblastoma, subgroups

                Comments

                Comment on this article