50
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Classical and Novel Prognostic Markers for Breast Cancer and their Clinical Significance

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The use of biomarkers ensures breast cancer patients receive optimal treatment. Established biomarkers such as estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR) have been playing significant roles in the selection and management of patients for endocrine therapy. HER2 is a strong predictor of response to trastuzumab. Recently, the roles of ER as a negative and HER2 as a positive indicator for chemotherapy have been established. Ki67 has traditionally been recognized as a poor prognostic factor, but recent studies suggest that measurement of Ki67-positive cells during treatment will more effectively predict treatment efficacy for both anti-hormonal and chemotherapy. p53 mutations are found in 20–35% of human breast cancers and are associated with aggressive disease with poor clinical outcome when the DNA-binding domain is mutated. The utility of cyclin D1 as a predictor of breast cancer prognosis is controversial, but cyclin D1b overexpression is associated with poor prognosis. Likewise, overexpression of the low molecular weight form of cyclin E1 protein predicts poor prognosis. Breast cancers from BRCA1/2 carriers often show high nuclear grades, negativity to ER/PR/HER2, and p53 mutations, and thus, are associated with poor prognosis. The prognostic values of other molecular markers, such as p14 ARF, TBX2/3, VEGF in breast cancer are also discussed. Careful evaluation of these biomarkers with current treatment modality is required to determine whether their measurement or monitoring offer significant clinical benefits.

          Related collections

          Most cited references192

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Live or let die: the cell's response to p53.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            When mutants gain new powers: news from the mutant p53 field.

            Ample data indicate that mutant p53 proteins not only lose their tumour suppressive functions, but also gain new abilities that promote tumorigenesis. Moreover, recent studies have modified our view of mutant p53 proteins, portraying them not as inert mutants, but rather as regulated proteins that influence the cancer cell transcriptome and phenotype. This influence is clinically manifested as association of TP53 mutations with poor prognosis and drug resistance in a growing array of malignancies. Here, we review recent studies on mutant p53 regulation, gain-of-function mechanisms, transcriptional effects and prognostic association, with a focus on the clinical implications of these findings.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              The codon 72 polymorphic variants of p53 have markedly different apoptotic potential.

              The gene TP53, encoding p53, has a common sequence polymorphism that results in either proline or arginine at amino-acid position 72. This polymorphism occurs in the proline-rich domain of p53, which is necessary for the protein to fully induce apoptosis. We found that in cell lines containing inducible versions of alleles encoding the Pro72 and Arg72 variants, and in cells with endogenous p53, the Arg72 variant induces apoptosis markedly better than does the Pro72 variant. Our data indicate that at least one source of this enhanced apoptotic potential is the greater ability of the Arg72 variant to localize to the mitochondria; this localization is accompanied by release of cytochrome c into the cytosol. These data indicate that the two polymorphic variants of p53 are functionally distinct, and these differences may influence cancer risk or treatment.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Clin Med Insights Oncol
                101467911
                Clinical Medicine Insights. Oncology
                Libertas Academica
                1179-5549
                20 April 2010
                2010
                : 4
                : 15-34
                Affiliations
                [1 ]The Departments of Pathology and
                [2 ]Cancer Biology
                [3 ]Graduate Program in Molecular Medicine, Wake Forest University Health Sciences, Medical Center Boulevard, Winston-Salem, NC 27157, USA
                Author notes
                Article
                cmo-2010-015
                10.4137/CMO.S4773
                2883240
                20567632
                b8433487-84ec-4ebf-8343-6fe51c8a4251
                © 2010 the author(s), publisher and licensee Libertas Academica Ltd.

                This is an open access article. Unrestricted non-commercial use is permitted provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                Categories
                Review

                Oncology & Radiotherapy
                p53,vegf,arf,cyclin d1,brca1/2,cyclin e,pr,er,tbx2/3,her2,molecular marker,breast cancer,prognosis,ki67
                Oncology & Radiotherapy
                p53, vegf, arf, cyclin d1, brca1/2, cyclin e, pr, er, tbx2/3, her2, molecular marker, breast cancer, prognosis, ki67

                Comments

                Comment on this article