1
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      The Influence of Number Magnitude on Continuous Swiping Movements

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          There is accumulating evidence that numerical information influences the way in which we perform bodily movements. Specifically, the idea that our cognitive representations of numbers and space interact is supported by systematic associations of space with both number magnitude (SNARC effect) and number parity (MARC effect). However, whether this influence is bound to the left or right side of space or to the hand with which we perform the movement remains debated. One novel and interesting way to disentangle these factors is to use movement responses in which hand and movement direction can be dissociated. In the present study, participants moved a central object to the left or right side on a touchscreen with their index fingers as response to a parity judgment and magnitude classification task. We observed significant SNARC effects in both tasks. Number magnitude and response direction interacted, but magnitude and response hand did not. This indicated that the SNARC effect can be independent of the responding hand. Importantly, however, a MARC effect was observed not only in an interaction between response direction and parity, but also in an interaction between response hand and parity, suggesting that response hand plays a role in the interaction between physical space and parity. Additionally, number magnitude influenced the amplitude of participants’ response movements, with larger numbers eliciting longer movements. These results indicate that space, magnitude and parity interact on different levels that can be unraveled in a paradigm utilizing continuous movements such as swiping.

          Related collections

          Most cited references43

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences

          G*Power (Erdfelder, Faul, & Buchner, 1996) was designed as a general stand-alone power analysis program for statistical tests commonly used in social and behavioral research. G*Power 3 is a major extension of, and improvement over, the previous versions. It runs on widely used computer platforms (i.e., Windows XP, Windows Vista, and Mac OS X 10.4) and covers many different statistical tests of the t, F, and chi2 test families. In addition, it includes power analyses for z tests and some exact tests. G*Power 3 provides improved effect size calculators and graphic options, supports both distribution-based and design-based input modes, and offers all types of power analyses in which users might be interested. Like its predecessors, G*Power 3 is free.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            The mental representation of parity and number magnitude.

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Time required for judgements of numerical inequality.

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                JNC
                J Numer Cogn
                Journal of Numerical Cognition
                J. Numer. Cogn.
                PsychOpen
                2363-8761
                07 September 2018
                2018
                : 4
                : 2
                : 297-316
                Affiliations
                [a ]Department of Educational Sciences, University of Regensburg , Regensburg, Germany
                [b ]Department of Psychology, University of Potsdam , Potsdam, Germany
                [c ]Neuro-Cognitive Plasticity Lab, Knowledge Media Research Center , Tuebingen, Germany
                [d ]Applied Cognitive Psychology and Media Psychology, University of Tuebingen , Tuebingen, Germany
                [5] University of Graz , Graz, Austria
                [6] University of Bern , Bern, Switzerland
                [7] Swiss Distance Learning University , Brig, Switzerland
                [8] Tarleton State University , Stephenville, TX, USA
                Author notes
                [* ]University of Regensburg, Department of Educational Sciences, Universitaetsstr. 31, 93053 Regensburg, Germany. Phone: +49/941 943-1750. Fax: +49/941 943-1993. ursula.fischer@ 123456ur.de
                Article
                jnc.v4i2.135
                10.5964/jnc.v4i2.135
                b88f9801-0f14-4eeb-99e2-1176fd2a35c0

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) 4.0 License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 16 June 2017
                : 29 November 2017
                Product
                Self URI (journal-page): https://journals.psychopen.eu/
                Categories
                Special Thematic Section on "Tracking the Continuous Dynamics of Numerical Processing"

                Psychology
                number magnitude,swiping,SNARC effect,MARC effect
                Psychology
                number magnitude, swiping, SNARC effect, MARC effect

                Comments

                Comment on this article