14
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Interstitial glucose monitoring in people with diabetes Translated title: La monitorización de la glucosa intersticial en las personas con diabetes

      case-report

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Devices are now available that continuously measure the interstitial glucose of persons with diabetes. They have been shown to have a very positive impact on metabolic control of the disease, with blood sugar within acceptable ranges for a longer period and a significant reduction of low blood glucose, which makes for greater patient safety and comfort 1 - 4 . These monitors are included in the service portfolio of the National Health System in Spain, and are currently financed for patients with type 1 diabetes 5 , type 2 diabetes 6 and other insulin-dependent patients (monogenetic diabetes, cystic fibrosis, pancreoprivic diabetes and hemochromatosis), as long as they are receiving intensive insulin therapy and require more than 6 finger pricks a day. A growing number of people are entering prison with these devices, which obliges professionals to familiarise themselves with how they work. There are two types of continuous interstitial glucose monitors: Real time continuous monitoring systems, with a sensor that includes a transmitter that continuously sends measurement data to the receiver, which is a mobile device, the use of which are restricted in prison. Flash monitoring systems (Figure 1), where the sensor (Figure 2) does not include a transmitter. To obtain the complete glucose history the sensor has to be scanned with the reader at least once every eight hours (Figure 3). This system is the one used in prisons. Figure 1 Flash monitoring system kit. Figure 2 Sensor of flash monitoring system Figure 3 Reader of flash monitoring system. The data in both systems is downloaded to a digital platform where it is processed via logs and graphs (Figure 4). In both cases, a set of alerts can be programmed to warn the patient of hypoglycaemia and hyperglycaemia, amongst other options. This greatly improves patient safety. Figure 4 Log and graphs of interstitial glucose data. The duration of the sensor is 6-14 days depending on the model. Wet skin and excess hair should be avoided when placing the sensor (Figure 5) 7 , because they can make adhesion more difficult; areas with lipodostrophy, scars and moles should also be avoided. A dressing is recommended to ensure that the sensor sticks to the skin, thus preventing incorrect measurements. If the patient has contact dermatitis, a protective hydrocolloid dressing or Tegaderm® dressing can be applied to the skin before the sensor is inserted 8 . Figure 5 Insertion of monitoring sensor. It should be borne in mind that when the blood glucose is stable for a period of time, there is a match in the readings for blood and interstitial glucose. If not, there is a delay between the interstitial and capillary of about 5-10 minutes. There are situations of greater instability in readings of interstitial glycaemia (postprandial period, exercise, first hours of sensor use, hypo and hyperglycaemia, etc.) that can lead to incorrect calculations of the insulin dose, and so a capillary glucose reading is recommended before making any further decisions. This measurement is also recommended in cases where symptoms appear that do not match the monitor reading. Technological advances oblige us to keep constantly up to date. They also represent a challenge to the prison system, since there is the added obligation of making prison security compatible with the right of patients to receive the same services as persons in the community.

          Related collections

          Most cited references11

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Novel glucose-sensing technology and hypoglycaemia in type 1 diabetes: a multicentre, non-masked, randomised controlled trial.

          Tight control of blood glucose in type 1 diabetes delays onset of macrovascular and microvascular diabetic complications; however, glucose levels need to be closely monitored to prevent hypoglycaemia. We aimed to assess whether a factory-calibrated, sensor-based, flash glucose-monitoring system compared with self-monitored glucose testing reduced exposure to hypoglycaemia in patients with type 1 diabetes.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Impact of flash glucose monitoring on hypoglycaemia in adults with type 1 diabetes managed with multiple daily injection therapy: a pre-specified subgroup analysis of the IMPACT randomised controlled trial

            Aims/hypothesis Evidence for the effectiveness of interstitial glucose monitoring in individuals with type 1 diabetes using multiple daily injection (MDI) therapy is limited. In this pre-specified subgroup analysis of the Novel Glucose-Sensing Technology and Hypoglycemia in Type 1 Diabetes: a Multicentre, Non-masked, Randomised Controlled Trial’ (IMPACT), we assessed the impact of flash glucose technology on hypoglycaemia compared with capillary glucose monitoring. Methods This multicentre, prospective, non-masked, RCT enrolled adults from 23 European diabetes centres. Individuals were eligible to participate if they had well-controlled type 1 diabetes (diagnosed for ≥5 years), HbA1c ≤ 58 mmol/mol [7.5%], were using MDI therapy and on their current insulin regimen for ≥3 months, reported self-monitoring of blood glucose on a regular basis (equivalent to ≥3 times/day) for ≥2 months and were deemed technically capable of using flash glucose technology. Individuals were excluded if they were diagnosed with hypoglycaemia unawareness, had diabetic ketoacidosis or myocardial infarction in the preceding 6 months, had a known allergy to medical-grade adhesives, used continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) within the previous 4 months or were currently using CGM or sensor-augmented pump therapy, were pregnant or planning pregnancy or were receiving steroid therapy for any disorders. Following 2 weeks of blinded (to participants and investigator) sensor wear by all participants, participants with sensor data for more than 50% of the blinded wear period (or ≥650 individual sensor results) were randomly assigned, in a 1:1 ratio by a central interactive web response system (IWRS) using the biased-coin minimisation method, to flash sensor-based glucose monitoring (intervention group) or self-monitoring of capillary blood glucose (control group). The control group had two further 14 day blinded sensor-wear periods at the 3 and 6 month time points. Participants, investigators and staff were not masked to group allocation. The primary outcome was the change in time in hypoglycaemia (<3.9 mmol/l) between baseline and 6 months in the full analysis set. Results Between 4 September 2014 and 12 February 2015, 167 participants using MDI were enrolled. After screening and the baseline phase, participants were randomised to intervention (n = 82) and control groups (n = 81). One woman from each group was excluded owing to pregnancy; the full analysis set included 161 randomised participants. At 6 months, mean time in hypoglycaemia was reduced by 46.0%, from 3.44 h/day to 1.86 h/day in the intervention group (baseline adjusted mean change, −1.65 h/day), and from 3.73 h/day to 3.66 h/day in the control group (baseline adjusted mean change, 0.00 h/day), with a between-group difference of −1.65 (95% CI −2.21, −1.09; p < 0.0001). For participants in the intervention group, the mean ± SD daily sensor scanning frequency was 14.7 ± 10.7 (median 12.3) and the mean number of self-monitored blood glucose tests performed per day reduced from 5.5 ± 2.0 (median 5.4) at baseline to 0.5 ± 1.0 (median 0.1). The baseline frequency of self-monitored blood glucose tests by control participants was maintained (from 5.6 ± 1.9 [median 5.2] to 5.5 ± 2.6 [median 5.1] per day). Treatment satisfaction and perception of hypo/hyperglycaemia were improved compared with control. No device-related hypoglycaemia or safety-related issues were reported. Nine serious adverse events were reported for eight participants (four in each group), none related to the device. Eight adverse events for six of the participants in the intervention group were also reported, which were related to sensor insertion/wear; four of these participants withdrew because of the adverse event. Conclusions/interpretation Use of flash glucose technology in type 1 diabetes controlled with MDI therapy significantly reduced time in hypoglycaemia without deterioration of HbA1c, and improved treatment satisfaction. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02232698 Funding: Abbott Diabetes Care, Witney, UK Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1007/s00125-017-4527-5) contains peer-reviewed but unedited supplementary material, which is available to authorised users.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Three European Retrospective Real-World Chart Review Studies to Determine the Effectiveness of Flash Glucose Monitoring on HbA1c in Adults with Type 2 Diabetes

              Introduction The impact of flash glucose monitoring technology on HbA1c in type 2 diabetes managed by basal bolus insulin is uncertain. Three parallel European retrospective non-interventional chart review studies collected data reported in medical records. Each country’s study aim was to determine the effectiveness of the device on HbA1c when used by their population for 3–6 months as their standard of care for management of glycaemia in a real-world setting. Methods Medical records were eligible for adult patients with type 2 diabetes, on a basal bolus insulin regimen for 1 year or more, device use for 3 months or more before the start of the study, an HbA1c concentration up to 3 months prior to starting device use (patients were using blood glucose monitoring for self-management) between 64 and 108 mmol/mol (8.0–12.0%) plus an HbA1c determination 3–6 months after commencing flash glucose monitoring use. Results Records were analysed from 18 medical centres in Austria (n = 92), France (n = 88) and Germany (n = 183). Baseline HbA1c results, recorded up to 90 days before the start of device use, were comparable across the three countries and were reduced significantly by 9.6 ± 8.8 mmol/mol mean ± SD (Austria [0.9 ± 0.8%], p < 0.0001), 8.9 ± 12.5 mmol/mol (France [0.8% ± 1.1], p < 0.0001) and 10.1 ± 12.2 mmol/mol (Germany [0.9% ± 1.1], p < 0.0001). No significant differences were detected between age group, sex, BMI or duration of insulin use. Conclusions Three European real-world, chart review studies in people with type 2 diabetes managed using basal bolus insulin therapy each concluded that HbA1c was significantly reduced after changing to use of flash glucose monitoring for 3–6 months in a real-world setting. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1007/s13300-019-00741-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Rev Esp Sanid Penit
                Rev Esp Sanid Penit
                sanipe
                Revista Española de Sanidad Penitenciaria
                Sociedad Española de Sanidad Penitenciaria
                1575-0620
                2013-6463
                May-Aug 2023
                14 July 2023
                : 25
                : 2
                : 80-83
                Affiliations
                [1 ] original Specialist Nurse in Family and Community Nursing. Madrid III-Valdemoro Prison. Madrid. Spain. orgnameMadrid III-Valdemoro Prison Madrid, Spain
                [2 ] original Doctor in Pharmacy. Pharmacist at Madrid III-Valdemoro Prison. Madrid. Spain. orgnameMadrid III-Valdemoro Prison Madrid, Spain
                [3 ] original Medical Specialist in Family and Community Medicine. Specialist in Psychiatry. Psychiatrist at Madrid III-Valdemoro Prison. Madrid. Spain. orgnameMadrid III-Valdemoro Prison Madrid, Spain
                Author notes
                [* ] Correspondence Sofía Victoria Casado Hoces. Centro Penitenciario de Madrid III-Valdemoro. Madrid. E-mail: pasocrisce@ 123456yahoo.es
                Article
                10.18176/resp.00071
                10366708
                b890b1b3-a5b4-4bbe-9116-5e30f4ac837f

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License

                History
                : 25 April 2023
                : 26 April 2023
                Page count
                Figures: 5, Tables: 0, Equations: 0, References: 8, Pages: 04
                Categories
                Visual Image of Prison Health Care

                Comments

                Comment on this article