5
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
2 collections
    0
    shares

      Submit your digital health research with JMIR Publications, a leading publisher of open access digital health research

      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Peer Review of “Patient Recommendations for the Content and Design of Electronic Returns of Genetic Test Results: Interview Study Among Patients Who Accessed Their Genetic Test Results via the Internet”

      reviewer-report

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Related collections

          Most cited references1

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          Patient Recommendations for the Content and Design of Electronic Returns of Genetic Test Results: Interview Study Among Patients Who Accessed Their Genetic Test Results via the Internet

          Background Genetic test results will be increasingly made available electronically as more patient-facing tools are developed; however, little research has been done that collects data on patient preferences for content and design before creating results templates. Objective This study identifies patient preferences for the electronic return of genetic test results, including what considerations should be prioritized for content and design. Methods Following user-centered design methods, 59 interviews were conducted by using semistructured protocols. The interviews explored the content and design issues of patient portals that facilitated the return of test results to patients. We interviewed patients who received electronic results for specific types of genetics tests (pharmacogenetic tests, hereditary blood disorder tests, and tests for the risk of heritable cancers) or electronically received any type of genetic or nongenetic test results. Results In general, many of participants felt that there always needed to be some clinician involvement in electronic result returns and that electronic coversheets with simple summaries would be helpful for facilitating this. Coversheet summaries could accompany, but not replace, the more detailed report. Participants had specific suggestions for such results summaries, such as only reporting the information that was the most important for patients to understand, including next steps, and doing so by using clear language that is free of medical jargon. Electronic result returns should also include explicit encouragement for patients to contact health care providers about questions. Finally, many participants preferred to manage their care by using their smartphones, particularly in instances when they needed to access health information on the go. Conclusions Participants recommended that a patient-friendly front section should accompany the more detailed report and made suggestions for organization, content, and wording. Many used their smartphones regularly to access test results; therefore, health systems and patient portal software vendors should accommodate smartphone app design and web portal design concomitantly when developing platforms for returning results.

            Author and article information

            Journal
            JMIRx Med
            JMIRx Med
            JMIRxMed
            JMIRx Med
            JMIR Publications (Toronto, Canada )
            2563-6316
            Apr-Jun 2022
            31 May 2022
            : 3
            : 2
            : e37323
            Article
            v3i2e37323
            10.2196/37323
            10414391
            b8994f2e-d5e3-4eab-b053-a7b990742ec4
            © . Originally published in JMIRx Med (https://med.jmirx.org), 31.05.2022.

            This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIRx Med, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on https://med.jmirx.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.

            History
            : 15 February 2022
            : 15 February 2022
            Categories
            Peer-Review Report
            Peer-Review Report

            user-centered design,genomic medicine,patient portals,electronic health records,return of results,bioethics,ehr,genetics,genetic testing,patient preferences,design,human factors

            Comments

            Comment on this article

            Related Documents Log