15
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      The minimal important difference of exercise tests in severe COPD

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Our aim was to determine the minimal important difference (MID) for 6-min walk distance (6MWD) and maximal cycle exercise capacity (MCEC) in patients with severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).

          1,218 patients enrolled in the National Emphysema Treatment Trial completed exercise tests before and after 4–6 weeks of pre-trial rehabilitation, and 6 months after randomisation to surgery or medical care. The St George’s Respiratory Questionnaire (domain and total scores) and University of California San Diego Shortness of Breath Questionnaire (total score) served as anchors for anchor-based MID estimates. In order to calculate distribution-based estimates, we used the standard error of measurement, Cohen’s effect size and the empirical rule effect size.

          Anchor-based estimates for the 6MWD were 18.9 m (95% CI 18.1–20.1 m), 24.2 m (95% CI 23.4–25.4 m), 24.6 m (95% CI 23.4–25.7 m) and 26.4 m (95% CI 25.4–27.4 m), which were similar to distribution-based MID estimates of 25.7, 26.8 and 30.6 m. For MCEC, anchor-based estimates for the MID were 2.2 W (95% CI 2.0–2.4 W), 3.2 W (95% CI 3.0–3.4 W), 3.2 W (95% CI 3.0–3.4 W) and 3.3 W (95% CI 3.0–3.5 W), while distribution-based estimates were 5.3 and 5.5 W.

          We suggest a MID of 26±2 m for 6MWD and 4±1 W for MCEC for patients with severe COPD.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          8803460
          3682
          Eur Respir J
          Eur. Respir. J.
          The European respiratory journal
          0903-1936
          1399-3003
          11 May 2017
          06 August 2010
          April 2011
          19 July 2017
          : 37
          : 4
          : 784-790
          Affiliations
          [* ]Dept of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health
          [## ]Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD
          [+ ]Division of Pulmonary, Allergy, and Critical Care Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA
          [§ ]Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Cedars Sinai Medical Center, University of California, Los Angeles, CA
          [ʄ ]Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, University of California, San Diego, CA
          [** ]Division of Pulmonary Sciences and Critical Care Medicine, University of Colorado, Denver, CO, USA
          [# ]Horten Centre, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
          []Dept of Clinical Epidemiology & Biostatistics, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
          Author notes
          CORRESPONDENCE M.A. Puhan, Dept of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, 615 North Wolfe Street, Room W5010, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA, mpuhan@ 123456jhsph.edu
          [¶¶]

          These authors contributed equally to the study.

          [++]

          A full list of the NETT Research Group members and their affiliations can be found in the Acknowledgements section.

          Article
          PMC5516638 PMC5516638 5516638 nihpa872272
          10.1183/09031936.00063810
          5516638
          20693247
          b89fc3e4-99d4-4f95-b041-22901eb3cfb6
          History
          Categories
          Article

          rehabilitation,exercise tests,clinical trials,chronic obstructive pulmonary disease treatment,Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

          Comments

          Comment on this article