23
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Synergy between Variant PRC1 Complexes Defines Polycomb-Mediated Gene Repression

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Summary

          The Polycomb system modifies chromatin and plays an essential role in repressing gene expression to control normal mammalian development. However, the components and mechanisms that define how Polycomb protein complexes achieve this remain enigmatic. Here, we use combinatorial genetic perturbation coupled with quantitative genomics to discover the central determinants of Polycomb-mediated gene repression in mouse embryonic stem cells. We demonstrate that canonical Polycomb repressive complex 1 (PRC1), which mediates higher-order chromatin structures, contributes little to gene repression. Instead, we uncover an unexpectedly high degree of synergy between variant PRC1 complexes, which is fundamental to gene repression. We further demonstrate that variant PRC1 complexes are responsible for distinct pools of H2A monoubiquitylation that are associated with repression of Polycomb target genes and silencing during X chromosome inactivation. Together, these discoveries reveal a new variant PRC1-dependent logic for Polycomb-mediated gene repression.

          Graphical Abstract

          Highlights

          • Canonical PRC1 complexes contribute little to H2AK119ub1 and gene repression

          • Variant PRC1 complexes deposit H2AK119ub1 broadly throughout the genome

          • Pervasive deposition of H2AK119ub1 by PCGF3/5-PRC1 is linked to X chromosome silencing

          • Synergy between variant PRC1 complexes defines Polycomb-mediated gene repression

          Abstract

          In this article, Fursova et al. uncover the central determinants of Polycomb-mediated gene repression in ESCs. They demonstrate that deposition of H2AK119ub1 and gene repression is driven by synergy between variant PRC1 complexes with little contribution from canonical PRC1 complexes, which mediate higher-order chromatin structures.

          Related collections

          Most cited references62

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          A gene complex controlling segmentation in Drosophila.

          E B Lewis (1978)
          The bithorax gene complex in Drosophila contains a minimum of eight genes that seem to code for substances controlling levels of thoracic and abdominal development. The state of repression of at least four of these genes is controlled by cis-regulatory elements and a separate locus (Polycomb) seems to code for a repressor of the complex. The wild-type and mutant segmentation patterns are consistent with an antero-posterior gradient in repressor concentration along the embryo and a proximo-distal gradient along the chromosome in the affinities for repressor of each gene's cis-regulatory element.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Role of histone H2A ubiquitination in Polycomb silencing.

            Covalent modification of histones is important in regulating chromatin dynamics and transcription. One example of such modification is ubiquitination, which mainly occurs on histones H2A and H2B. Although recent studies have uncovered the enzymes involved in histone H2B ubiquitination and a 'cross-talk' between H2B ubiquitination and histone methylation, the responsible enzymes and the functions of H2A ubiquitination are unknown. Here we report the purification and functional characterization of an E3 ubiquitin ligase complex that is specific for histone H2A. The complex, termed hPRC1L (human Polycomb repressive complex 1-like), is composed of several Polycomb-group proteins including Ring1, Ring2, Bmi1 and HPH2. hPRC1L monoubiquitinates nucleosomal histone H2A at lysine 119. Reducing the expression of Ring2 results in a dramatic decrease in the level of ubiquitinated H2A in HeLa cells. Chromatin immunoprecipitation analysis demonstrated colocalization of dRing with ubiquitinated H2A at the PRE and promoter regions of the Drosophila Ubx gene in wing imaginal discs. Removal of dRing in SL2 tissue culture cells by RNA interference resulted in loss of H2A ubiquitination concomitant with derepression of Ubx. Thus, our studies identify the H2A ubiquitin ligase, and link H2A ubiquitination to Polycomb silencing.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Histone methyltransferase activity of a Drosophila Polycomb group repressor complex.

              Polycomb group (PcG) proteins maintain transcriptional repression during development, likely by creating repressive chromatin states. The Extra Sex Combs (ESC) and Enhancer of Zeste [E(Z)] proteins are partners in an essential PcG complex, but its full composition and biochemical activities are not known. A SET domain in E(Z) suggests this complex might methylate histones. We purified an ESC-E(Z) complex from Drosophila embryos and found four major subunits: ESC, E(Z), NURF-55, and the PcG repressor, SU(Z)12. A recombinant complex reconstituted from these four subunits methylates lysine-27 of histone H3. Mutations in the E(Z) SET domain disrupt methyltransferase activity in vitro and HOX gene repression in vivo. These results identify E(Z) as a PcG protein with enzymatic activity and implicate histone methylation in PcG-mediated silencing.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Mol Cell
                Mol. Cell
                Molecular Cell
                Cell Press
                1097-2765
                1097-4164
                06 June 2019
                06 June 2019
                : 74
                : 5
                : 1020-1036.e8
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Biochemistry, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3QU, UK
                [2 ]Laboratory of Medical Omics Research, Department of Frontier Research and Development, Kazusa DNA Research Institute, 2-6-7 Kazusa-Kamatari, Kisarazu, Chiba 292-0818, Japan
                [3 ]Laboratory for Developmental Genetics, RIKEN Center for Integrative Medical Sciences, 1-7-29 Suehiro-cho, Tsurumi-ku, Yokohama, Kanagawa 230-0045, Japan
                [4 ]AMED-CREST, Japanese Agency for Medical Research and Development, 1-7-22 Suehiro-cho, Tsurumi-ku, Yokohama 230-0045, Japan
                Author notes
                []Corresponding author rob.klose@ 123456bioch.ox.ac.uk
                [5]

                These authors contributed equally

                [6]

                Lead Contact

                Article
                S1097-2765(19)30228-X
                10.1016/j.molcel.2019.03.024
                6561741
                31029541
                b8b3cbaf-2720-411e-8cc9-e09641066b18
                © 2019 The Author(s)

                This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

                History
                : 18 September 2018
                : 4 February 2019
                : 21 March 2019
                Categories
                Article

                Molecular biology
                chromatin,epigenetics,gene expression,polycomb,histone,ubiquitylation,histone modification,prc1,prc2,pcgf

                Comments

                Comment on this article