24
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Risk factors and outcomes of diffuse alveolar haemorrhage after allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Diffuse alveolar haemorrhage (DAH) is a life-threatening pulmonary complication occurring after allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) without an explicit aetiology or a standard treatment. This study aimed to explore the occurrence and prognosis of DAH after allo-HSCT, in addition to comparing discrepancies in the incidence, clinical characteristics and outcomes of DAH between patients undergoing haploidentical HSCT (HID-HSCT) and matched related donor HSCT (MRD-HSCT). We retrospectively evaluated 92 consecutive patients among 3987 patients with a confirmed diagnosis of DAH following allo-HSCT (HID: 71 patients, MRD: 21 patients). The incidence of DAH after allo-HSCT was 2.3%, 2.4% after HID-HSCT and 2.0% after MRD-HSCT ( P = 0.501). The prognosis of patients with DAH after transplantation is extremely poor. The duration of DAH was 7.5 days (range, 1–48 days). The probabilities of overall survival (OS) were significantly different between patients with and without DAH within 2 years after transplantation ( P < 0.001). According to the Cox regression analysis, a significant independent risk factor for the occurrence of DAH was delayed platelet engraftment ( P < 0.001), and a high D-dimer level (>500 ng/ml) was a significant risk factor for the poor prognosis of DAH. HID-HSCT is similar to MRD-HSCT in terms of the outcomes of DAH.

          Related collections

          Most cited references49

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found
          Is Open Access

          National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Project on Criteria for Clinical Trials in Chronic Graft-versus-Host Disease: I. The 2014 Diagnosis and Staging Working Group report.

          The 2005 National Institutes of Health (NIH) Consensus Conference proposed new criteria for diagnosing and scoring the severity of chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). The 2014 NIH consensus maintains the framework of the prior consensus with further refinement based on new evidence. Revisions have been made to address areas of controversy or confusion, such as the overlap chronic GVHD subcategory and the distinction between active disease and past tissue damage. Diagnostic criteria for involvement of mouth, eyes, genitalia, and lungs have been revised. Categories of chronic GVHD should be defined in ways that indicate prognosis, guide treatment, and define eligibility for clinical trials. Revisions have been made to focus attention on the causes of organ-specific abnormalities. Attribution of organ-specific abnormalities to chronic GVHD has been addressed. This paradigm shift provides greater specificity and more accurately measures the global burden of disease attributed to GVHD, and it will facilitate biomarker association studies.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            1994 Consensus Conference on Acute GVHD Grading.

            Grading acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) is usually based on quantification of rash, serum bilirubin and diarrhea. Standard criteria have been developed and used for > 20 years by most transplant centers. However, neither the standard GVHD grading system nor any of several revisions has been validated in the context of GVHD prophylaxis with cyclosporine. The 1994 Consensus Conference on Acute GVHD Grading held in Keystone in January 1994 provided an opportunity to: (1) review data regarding these standard criteria; (2) determine if there are sufficient data to revise these criteria; and (3) develop recommendations for reporting results of GVHD prevention trials. Data were provided for 8249 patients from 12 large transplant centers and 2 transplant registries. Standard GVHD grading criteria were found to distinguish different mortality risks and treatment response rates. Analysis of new data suggested that persistent nausea with histologic evidence of GVHD but no diarrhea be included as stage 1 gastrointestinal GVHD. Additional studies were recommended to evaluate heterogeneity of outcome within GVHD grades prior to making further revisions. To improve comparability between publications, reports of GVHD prevention trials should include an accurate description of the grading system used and should report actuarial rates of grades II-IV and III-IV GVHD corrected for graft failure and potential interventions for early relapse. Additional information should include indications for therapy of GVHD and response.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Clinical manifestations of graft-versus-host disease in human recipients of marrow from HL-A-matched sibling donors.

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                zhangxh100@sina.com
                Journal
                Bone Marrow Transplant
                Bone Marrow Transplant
                Bone Marrow Transplantation
                Nature Publishing Group UK (London )
                0268-3369
                1476-5365
                12 April 2021
                : 1-11
                Affiliations
                [1 ]GRID grid.11135.37, ISNI 0000 0001 2256 9319, Peking University People’s Hospital, , Peking University Institute of Haematology, ; Beijing, China
                [2 ]GRID grid.411634.5, ISNI 0000 0004 0632 4559, Beijing Key Laboratory of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation, ; Beijing, China
                [3 ]GRID grid.11135.37, ISNI 0000 0001 2256 9319, Collaborative Innovation Centre of Haematology, , Peking University, ; Beijing, China
                [4 ]National Clinical Research Centre for Hematologic Disease, Beijing, China
                [5 ]GRID grid.411634.5, ISNI 0000 0004 0632 4559, Peking University People’s Hospital, ; Beijing, China
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6778-547X
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0245-6792
                Article
                1293
                10.1038/s41409-021-01293-y
                8040008
                b8bb640f-4464-46a6-8b49-8035cde646d0
                © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Limited 2021

                This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic.

                History
                : 10 July 2020
                : 15 March 2021
                : 29 March 2021
                Funding
                Funded by: FundRef https://doi.org/10.13039/501100001809, National Natural Science Foundation of China (National Science Foundation of China);
                Award ID: No.81970113, No.81730004 and No.81670116
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: FundRef https://doi.org/10.13039/501100009592, Beijing Municipal Science and Technology Commission;
                Award ID: No.Z171100001017084
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: FundRef https://doi.org/10.13039/501100004826, Natural Science Foundation of Beijing Municipality (Beijing Natural Science Foundation);
                Award ID: No.H2018206423, No. 7171013
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: the Foundation for Innovative Research Groups of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No.81621001) the National Key Research and Development Program of China (No.2017YFA0105500, No.2017YFA0105503)
                Categories
                Article

                Transplantation
                risk factors,haematological diseases
                Transplantation
                risk factors, haematological diseases

                Comments

                Comment on this article