100
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Heterogeneous Genetic Background of the Association of Pheochromocytoma/Paraganglioma and Pituitary Adenoma: Results From a Large Patient Cohort

      research-article
      , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
      The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism
      Endocrine Society

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Context:

          Pituitary adenomas and pheochromocytomas/paragangliomas (pheo/PGL) can occur in the same patient or in the same family. Coexistence of the two diseases could be due to either a common pathogenic mechanism or a coincidence.

          Objective:

          The objective of the investigation was to study the possible coexistence of pituitary adenoma and pheo/PGL.

          Design:

          Thirty-nine cases of sporadic or familial pheo/PGL and pituitary adenomas were investigated. Known pheo/PGL genes ( SDHA-D, SDHAF2, RET, VHL, TMEM127, MAX, FH) and pituitary adenoma genes ( MEN1, AIP, CDKN1B) were sequenced using next generation or Sanger sequencing. Loss of heterozygosity study and pathological studies were performed on the available tumor samples.

          Setting:

          The study was conducted at university hospitals.

          Patients:

          Thirty-nine patients with sporadic of familial pituitary adenoma and pheo/PGL participated in the study.

          Outcome:

          Outcomes included genetic screening and clinical characteristics.

          Results:

          Eleven germline mutations (five SDHB, one SDHC, one SDHD, two VHL, and two MEN1) and four variants of unknown significance (two SDHA, one SDHB, and one SDHAF2) were identified in the studied genes in our patient cohort. Tumor tissue analysis identified LOH at the SDHB locus in three pituitary adenomas and loss of heterozygosity at the MEN1 locus in two pheochromocytomas. All the pituitary adenomas of patients affected by SDHX alterations have a unique histological feature not previously described in this context.

          Conclusions:

          Mutations in the genes known to cause pheo/PGL can rarely be associated with pituitary adenomas, whereas mutation in a gene predisposing to pituitary adenomas ( MEN1) can be associated with pheo/PGL. Our findings suggest that genetic testing should be considered in all patients or families with the constellation of pheo/PGL and a pituitary adenoma.

          Related collections

          Most cited references40

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Prevalence of pituitary adenomas: a community-based, cross-sectional study in Banbury (Oxfordshire, UK).

          Pituitary adenomas (PAs) are associated with increased morbidity and mortality. The optimal delivery of services and the provision of care for patients with PAs require distribution of the resources proportionate to the impact of these conditions on the community. Currently, the resource allocation for PAs in the health care system is lacking a reliable and an up-to-date epidemiological background that would reflect the recent advances in the diagnostic technologies, leading to the earlier recognition of these tumours. To determine the prevalence, the diagnostic delay and the characteristics of patients with PA in a well-defined geographical area of the UK (Banbury, Oxfordshire). Sixteen general practitioner (GP) surgeries covering the area of Banbury and a total population of 89 334 inhabitants were asked to participate in the study (data confirmed on 31 July 2006). Fourteen surgeries with a total of 81,449 inhabitants (91% of the study population) agreed to take part. All cases of PAs were found following an exhaustive computer database search of agreed terms by the staff of each Practice and data on age, gender, presenting manifestations and their duration, imaging features at diagnosis, history of multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 and family history of PA were collected. A total of 63 patients with PA were identified amongst the study population of 81,149, with a prevalence of 77.6 PA cases/100,000 inhabitants (prolactinomas; PRLoma: 44.4, nonfunctioning PAs: 22.2, acromegaly; ACRO: 8.6, corticotroph adenoma: 1.2 and unknown functional status; UFS: 1.2/100,000 inhabitants). The distribution of each PA subtype was for PRLoma 57%, nonfunctioning PAs 28%, ACRO 11%, corticotroph adenoma 2% and UFS 2%. The median age at diagnosis and the duration of symptoms until diagnosis (in years) were for PRLoma 32.0 and 1.5, nonfunctioning PAs 51.5 and 0.8, ACRO 47 and 4.5 and corticotroph adenoma 57 and 7, respectively. PRLoma was the most frequent PA diagnosed up to the age of 60 years (0-20 years: 75% and 20-60 years: 61% of PAs) and nonfunctioning PA after the age of 60 years (60% of PAs). Nonfunctioning PAs dominated in men (57% of all men with PA) and PRLoma in women (76% of all women with PA). Five patients (7.9%) presented with classical pituitary apoplexy, with a prevalence of 6.2 cases/100,000 inhabitants. Based on a well-defined population in Banbury (Oxfordshire, UK), we have shown that PAs have a fourfold increased prevalence than previously thought; our data confirm that PAs have a higher burden on the Health Care System and optimal resource distribution for both clinical care and research activities aiming to improve the outcome of these patients are needed.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            High prevalence of pituitary adenomas: a cross-sectional study in the province of Liege, Belgium.

            Prevalence data are important for assessing the burden of disease on the health care system; data on pituitary adenoma prevalence are very scarce. The objective of the study was to measure the prevalence of clinically relevant pituitary adenomas in a well-defined population. This was a cross-sectional, intensive, case-finding study performed in three regions of the province of Liège, Belgium, to measure pituitary adenoma prevalence as of September 30, 2005. The study was conducted in specialist and general medical practitioner patient populations, referral hospitals, and investigational centers. Three demographically and geographically distinct districts of the province of Liège were delineated precisely using postal codes. Medical practitioners in these districts were recruited, and patients with pituitary adenomas under their care were identified. Diagnoses were confirmed after retrieval of clinical, hormonal, radiological, and pathological data; full demographic and therapeutic follow-up data were collected in all cases. Sixty-eight patients with clinically relevant pituitary adenomas were identified in a population of 71,972 individuals; the mean (+/- sd) prevalence was 94 +/- 19.3 cases per 100,000 population (95% confidence interval, 72.2 to 115.8). The group was 67.6% female and had a mean age at diagnosis of 40.3 yr; 42.6% had macroadenomas and 55.9% underwent surgery. Prolactinomas comprised 66% of the group, with the rest having nonsecreting tumors (14.7%), somatotropinomas (13.2%), or Cushing's disease (5.9%); 20.6% had hypopituitarism. The prevalence of pituitary adenomas in the study population (one case in 1064 individuals) was more than 3.5-5 times that previously reported. This increased prevalence may have important implications when prioritizing funding for research and treatment of pituitary adenomas.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of individuals with neurofibromatosis 1.

              Neurofibromatosis 1 (NF1) is a common neurocutaneous condition with an autosomal dominant pattern of inheritance. The complications are diverse and disease expression varies, even within families. Progress in molecular biology and neuroimaging and the development of mouse models have helped to elucidate the aetiology of NF1 and its clinical manifestations. Furthermore, these advances have raised the prospect of therapeutic intervention for this complex and distressing disease. Members of the United Kingdom Neurofibromatosis Association Clinical Advisory Board collaborated to produce a consensus statement on the current guidelines for diagnosis and management of NF1. The proposals are based on published clinical studies and on the pooled knowledge of experts in neurofibromatosis with experience of providing multidisciplinary clinical and molecular services for NF1 patients. The consensus statement discusses the diagnostic criteria, major differential diagnoses, clinical manifestations and the present strategies for monitoring and management of NF1 complications.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                J Clin Endocrinol Metab
                J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab
                jcem
                jceme
                jcem
                The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism
                Endocrine Society (Chevy Chase, MD )
                0021-972X
                1945-7197
                March 2015
                12 December 2014
                12 December 2014
                : 100
                : 3
                : E531-E541
                Affiliations
                Department of Endocrinology (J.D., U.S., M.D., P.G., W.M.D., M.K.), Barts and the London School of Medicine, Queen Mary University of London, London EC1M 6BQ, United Kingdom; Semmelweis University, School of PhD studies, Doctoral School of Clinical Medicine, Budapest, Hungary (J.D.), Endocrinology Directorate (F.S.), Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital, Norwich NR4 7UZ, United Kingdom; Department of Medical and Molecular Genetics (E.R., E.R.M.), University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, United Kingdom; Department of Molecular Genetics (K.S., M.O., S.E.), Royal Devon and Exeter National Health Service Foundation Trust, Exeter EX2 5DW, United Kingdom; University of Exeter Medical School (S.E.), Exeter EX4 4PY, United Kingdom; Oxford Medical Genetics Laboratories (T.C.), Oxford University Hospitals National Health Service Trust, The Churchill Hospital, Oxford OX3 7LJ, United Kingdom; Section on Endocrinology and Genetics (P.X., C.A.S.) and Section on Molecular Dysmorphology (C.W.), Eunice Kennedy Shriver Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892; Electron Microscopy Unit (L.M.), Department Histopathology, Charing Cross Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare National Health Service Trust, London W6 8RF, United Kingdom; Department of Clinical Genetics (A.K.), Great Ormond Street Hospital, London WC1N 1LE, United Kingdom; Departments of Oncology (N.F.) and Endocrinology (S.E.B.), University College London Hospitals, London WC1E 6BT, United Kingdom; Department of Diabetes and Endocrinology (D.M.), The Ipswich Hospital National Health Service Trust, Ipswich IP4 5PD, United Kingdom; Henry Wellcome Laboratories for Integrative Neuroscience and Endocrinology (S.L.), University of Bristol, Bristol BS1 3NY, United Kingdom; Department of Endocrinology (A.Ag., C.J.T.), Beaumont Hospital, Dublin 9, Ireland; Institute of Molecular and Experimental Medicine (A.R.), Cardiff University, Cardiff CF10 3US, United Kingdom; Department of Neurosurgery (J.G., M.P.), National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, London WC1N 3BG, United Kingdom; Servico de Endocrinologia e Metabologia (C.L.B.), Hospital de Clinicas, Universidade Federal do Parana, 80210 Curitiba, Brazil; Department of Endocrinology (P.D.), Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh 160012, India; Academic Endocrine Unit (R.V.T., M.S.), University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3QX, United Kingdom; Christie Hospital National Health Service Foundation Trust (C.H.), Manchester M20 4BX, United Kingdom; Centre for Endocrinology and Diabetes (J.D.), Institute of Human Development, Faculty of Medical and Human Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PT, United Kingdom; Department of Endocrinology (J.D.), Manchester Royal Infirmary, Central Manchester University Hospitals National Health Service Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester M13 9WL, United Kingdom; Division of Genetics and Epidemiology (R.E.), The Institute of Cancer Research, London SW7 3RP, United Kingdom; Department of Histopathology (B.O., P.T., K.S.), University Hospitals Birmingham National Health Service Foundation Trust, Birmingham B29 6JD, United Kingdom; APHM Conception (A.B.), Laboratory of Molecular Biology, and Aix-Marseille Université, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, CRN2M-Unité Mixte de Recherche, 7286 Marseille, France; Departments of Endocrinology and Medicine (S.M.W., A.Au.), Hospital Sant Pau, IIB-Sant Pau, Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Raras, Unit 747, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, 28029 Madrid, Spain; Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 08035 Barcelona, Spain; The JJR Macleod Centre for Diabetes, Endocrinology, and Metabolism (J.S.B.), Aberdeen Royal Infirmary, Aberdeen AB25 2ZB, Scotland, United Kingdom; Department of Endocrinology (C.P.), “Gr.T.Popa” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 700115 Iasi, Romania; Endocrinology Research Centre (N.D.), Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow 115478, Russian Federation; Department of Internal Medicine (A.R.-O.), Federal University of Minas Gerais, 30330-120 Belo Horizonte, Brazil; Department of Medical Oncology and Cancer Genetics (I.T.G.), Castellon Provincial Hospital, 12002 Spain; Department of Pediatrics and Medical Genetics (G.Y., V.I.), University Multiprofile Hospital for Active Treatment “St. Marina,” 2010 Varna, Bulgaria; Department of Radiology (J.E.), St Bartholomew's Hospital, London E1 4NS, United Kingdom; Oxford Centre for Diabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolism (A.B.G.), University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 7LJ, United Kingdom; INSERM Unité 1028 (J.T.), Centre de Pathologie Est, Hospices Civils de Lyon, University of Lyon, 69622 Lyon, France; Department of Medical Genetics (E.R.M.), University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 1TN, United Kingdom; and Division of Brain Sciences (F.R.), Imperial College, London SW7 2AZ, United Kingdom
                Author notes
                Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Professor Márta Korbonits, Department of Endocrinology, Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Charterhouse Square, London EC1M 6BQ, United Kingdom. E-mail: m.korbonits@ 123456qmul.ac.uk .
                Article
                14-3399
                10.1210/jc.2014-3399
                4333031
                25494863
                b8cb45dd-4902-4019-b00e-a35e0e532d2a

                This article has been published under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Copyright for this article is retained by the author(s). Author(s) grant(s) the Endocrine Society the exclusive right to publish the article and identify itself as the original publisher.

                History
                : 26 August 2014
                : 9 December 2014
                Categories
                1
                5
                10
                16
                17
                JCEM Online: Advances in Genetics

                Endocrinology & Diabetes
                Endocrinology & Diabetes

                Comments

                Comment on this article